ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03036358Updated Apr 6, 2026

Effect of Teledermatology on Length of Hospital Admission, Length of Stay, 30 Day Readmission Rate, and Antibiotic Use in Patients Presenting With Cellulitis vs Pseudocellulitis in an Academic ED Setting

An interventional study of teledermatology consult and Routine Care in Cellulitis, sponsored by Ohio State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-06.

Sponsored by Ohio State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered Jun 2016).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The effect of teledermatology on length of hospital admission, length of stay, 30 day readmission rate, and antibiotic use in patients presenting with cellulitis vs pseudocellulitis in an academic emergency department setting.

Read the detailed description

The Investigator hope to determine if the implementation of teledermatology in the emergency department (ED) at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center is beneficial in diagnosing cases of cellulitis and pseudocellulitis conditions. Prior studies have indicated that misdiagnosis may occur in up to 28% of patients in the ED with these conditions. Additionally, dermatological consults have been shown to change diagnosis or management of these conditions in more than 60% of the patients examined. Without the use of teledermatology, however, a dermatological consult would be prohibitively expensive and take time to obtain. The investigator proposes that by utilizing teledermatology in emergency rooms, the investigator can make faster, yet just as accurate, dermatological diagnoses in patients presenting with cellulitis-like symptoms. Subsequently, by reducing the number of misdiagnoses, unnecessary use of antibiotics and hospitalizations will also decrease, lowering health care costs and simultaneously providing patients with faster treatment of the actual dermatologic condition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cellulitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cellulitis

160 studies on the registry are indexed under Cellulitis; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 157 across 124 interventional studies indexed under Cellulitis.

Browse Cellulitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University is the lead sponsor of 663 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Of its 67 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 18
  • Present to the ED with cellulitis-like symptoms, including but not limited to the following: tenderness, redness, swelling, expansive lesion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant
  • prisoner
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Teledermatology consult

    To determine the benefit of teledermatology to differentiate cellulitis from pseudocellulitis in emergency departments through the analysis of time spent in the emergency department (ED), admission to the inpatient hospital, antibiotic use, time to improvement, and 30-day remission rate. This arm will undergo imaging, a dermatologic assessment will be performed, AND this assessment will be entered into the patients chart.

    Other: teledermatology consult

  • Other
    Routine Care

    To determine the benefit of teledermatology to differentiate cellulitis from pseudocellulitis in emergency departments through the analysis of time spent in the emergency department (ED), admission to the inpatient hospital, antibiotic use, time to improvement, and 30-day remission rate. This arm will undergo imaging, a dermatologic assessment will be performed, AND this assessment WILL NOT be entered into the patients chart

    Other: Routine Care

Interventions

  • Otherteledermatology consult

    Information from the dermatologic assessment will be entered into the patients chart.

  • OtherRoutine Care

    The dermatologic assessment will occur but not added to the patients medical record. Dermatology may still be consulted but will be at the prerogative of the treating hospitalist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Admission to the hospital

    To determine the benefit of teledermatology to differentiate cellulitis from pseudocellulitis in emergency departments through the analysis of time spent in the emergency department (ED), admission to the inpatient hospital, antibiotic use, time to improvement, We anticipate a high rate of pseudocellulitis, and this aim will determine if there is a difference in patient admissions among those who receive a dermatologic assessment

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of stay in the hospital

    Will assess time spent in the hospital for those that were admitted

    Time frame: 30 days post admission

  2. 30 day readmission rate

    Will assess hospitalization/emergency department readmission in the following 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days post admission

  3. Antibiotic use

    Will assess the frequency of antibiotic use between groups

    Time frame: 30 days post admission

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2016 to primary completion in Jan 2018, 24 months.

Of 18 interventional studies with no phase under Cellulitis, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 27. This study's 24 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 4, 2016
First posted
Jan 30, 2017
StartActual
Jan 2016
Primary completionActual
Jan 2018
CompletionActual
Jan 2018
Last update
Apr 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03036358
Responsible party
Ben H Kaffenberger (Assistant Professor, Ohio State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 30, 2017
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Jan 2018
Completion
Jan 2018
Last update
Apr 6, 2026

Study contacts

Benjamin H Kaffenberger, MD
principal investigator · OSU Dermatology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion