CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03035201COSMOS-MindUpdated Aug 22, 2023Results posted

COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study for the Mind

An observational study in Cognitive Impairment, Dementia and Aging, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-22.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,262
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The parent trial (COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study, COSMOS; NCT02422745) is a randomized clinical trial of cocoa extract supplement (containing a total of 500 mg/d flavanols, including 80 mg. (-)-epicatechins), and a standard multivitamin supplement to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer among men aged 60 years and older and women aged 65 years and older. A cognitive ancillary study (COSMOS-Mind) is being conducted among men and women, 65 years and older, who are enrolled in COSMOS and will examine whether the cocoa extract supplement or the multivitamin supplement improves cognitive function and reduces risk of cognitive impairment, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other related types of dementia. Participants at the Wake Forest site will only be getting a phone call.

Read the detailed description

Identifying a safe, affordable, and well-tolerated intervention that prevents cognitive decline in older adults is of critical public health importance. There is compelling evidence from basic science, and small clinical studies that cocoa flavanols may protect cognitive function in older adults and reduce risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementia. Thus, this intervention could have important downstream benefits for health care utilization and cost, caregiver burden, and overall quality of life for older adults. Cocoa flavanol effects on cognition, however, need to be assessed in a definitive clinical trial.

The parent trial (COSMOS) will enroll 21,442 women and men nationwide, drawn from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) participant cohort and the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) non-randomized respondent cohort, and will be conducted primarily by mail to assess whether high-potency cocoa flavanol extract and a multivitamin - alone or in combination - will reduce risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer over 3 years of follow-up.

After the COSMOS trial began, an advanced method to analyze cocoa flavanols was accredited by Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC) International as a First Action Official Method of Analysis https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaa132 [secure-web.cisco.com]). This updated method relies on a reference material (RM8403) recently standardized and made commercially available by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. While the actual cocoa flavanol content of the COSMOS intervention remained unchanged throughout the trial, the application of this new analytical method led to expected changes in how the total cocoa flavanol content is now reported. Applying AOAC 2020.05/RM8403 to the COSMOS intervention, the total cocoa flavanol content of the COSMOS intervention is now 500 mg/day. Reporting of (-)-epicatechin content remained unaffected. Going forward, this record will therefore apply AOAC 2020.05/RM8403 and report that the COSMOS intervention tested 500 mg/day of cocoa flavanols, including 80 mg of (-)-epicatechin.

Once participants are enrolled in COSMOS, the study team at Brigham and Women's Hospital will provide contact information and other parent trial outcomes for COSMOS-Mind participants to the Wake Forest team using a secure web-based data transfer system. This seamless exchange of information between sites will permit timely accounting to ensure that the targeted demographics for enrollment are achieved (e.g. gender, age, race, ethnicity).

COSMOS-Mind will only be administered a telephone cognitive assessment to all participants at enrollment (baseline), and annually for 3 years of follow-up by trained and certified staff of the Wake Forest COSMOS-Mind team.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Dementia
  • Aging

Keywords

  • Memory
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment
  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Cognition
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,843 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,099 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,262 is above the median of 150 across 950 observational studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,320 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 323 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 243 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

COSMOS-Mind will include 2,000 participants from the COSMOS parent trial who are at least 65 years of age, with approximately equal distribution of women and men.

Participants in COSMOS (NCT02422745) who meet the following criteria are eligible to participate in this ancillary study:

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria -

  1. Men and women 65 years and older.
  2. Willingness to participate.
  3. Ability to answer questions by phone.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria -

  1. Participants who are co-enrolled in the WHI Memory Study.
  2. Participants with insulin-dependent diabetes.
  3. Participants who are unable to complete the baseline cognitive assessments.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,262 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cocoa extract + multivitamin (MTV)

    2 capsules containing 500 mg/d cocoa extract; daily MTV

  • Cocoa extract + multivitamin placebo

    2 capsules containing 500 mg/d cocoa extract; daily MTV placebo

  • Cocoa extract placebo + multivitamin

    Cocoa extract placebo (2 capsules/d); daily MTV

  • Cocoa extract placebo + multivitamin placebo

    Cocoa extract placebo (2 capsules/d); daily MTV placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Global Cognitive Function: Average Change Over Follow-up From Baseline

    A composite cognitive measure that averages individual test z-scores of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICSm) Total and Long, the Immediate and Delayed Story Recall tests, the Oral Trail Making A and B tests (log-transformed), the Category Fluency and Verbal Fluency tests, and the Number Span Backward and Forward tests. Scores are ordered so that better performance corresponds to higher positive scores. Longitudinal data are used to create a linear contrast for the primary analysis to compare the difference between the average of scores at Years 1, 2, and 3 and the baseline score, i.e. (z1+z2+z3)/3 - z0, where z's denote the composited measures at baseline and years 1-3. This contrast is fitted using a random effects model for repeated measures. The primary comparison is for the margins of the factorial design: active cocoa flavonal (with or without active multivitamin) versus placebo flavonal (with or without active multivitamin).

    Time frame: From Baseline through Year 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite Cognitive Function

    A composite cognitive measure that averages individual test z-scores of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICSm) Total and Long, the Immediate and Delayed Story Recall tests, the Oral Trail Making A and B tests (log-transformed), the Category Fluency and Verbal Fluency tests, and the Number Span Backward and Forward tests. Scores are ordered so that better performance corresponds to higher positive scores. Longitudinal data are used to create a linear contrast for the primary analysis to compare the difference between the average of scores at Years 1, 2, and 3 and the baseline score, i.e. (z1+z2+z3)/3 - z0, where z's denote the composited measures at baseline and years 1-3. This contrast is fitted using a random effects model for repeated measures. The comparison for this secondary outcome is based on the margins of the factorial design to compare multivitamin (with or without cocoa flavonal) with multivitamin placebo (with or without cocoa flavonal)

    Time frame: From baseline through year 3

  2. Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Mild cognitive impairment based on centralized adjudication of cognitive test scores and input from a proxy. Limited to participants free of mild cognitive impairment at baseline. Incidence over 3 years of follow-up.

    Time frame: From baseline through year 3

  3. Incidence of Mild Cognitive Impairment Among Those Free at Baseline

    Mild cognitive impairment based on central adjudication of test scores with input from proxies. Based on test scores administered annually across 3 years.

    Time frame: From baseline through year 3

  4. Executive Function

    Average of z-scores for the following tests: Oral Trail Making Test - B (log-transformed), Category Verbal Fluency, Letter Verbal Fluency, Number Span Test (Backwards and Forward). Higher (positive) scores reflect better performance. Linear contrast of scores collected at baseline, year 1, year 2, and year 3: (z1+z2+z3)/3 - z0)

    Time frame: From baseline through year 3

  5. Episodic Memory

    Average z-scores from Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified Delayed Word List, Story Immediate Recall, Story Delayed Recall. Higher (positive) scores reflect better performance. Annual test administrations.

    Time frame: From baseline through year 3

  6. Executive Function

    Average of z-scores for the following tests: Oral Trail Making Test - B (log-transformed), Category Verbal Fluency, Letter Verbal Fluency, Number Span Test (Backwards and Forward). Higher (positive) scores reflect better performance. Tests administered annually.

    Time frame: From baseline through year 3

  7. Episodic Memory

    Average z-scores from Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified Delayed Word List, Story Immediate Recall, Story Delayed Recall. Higher (positive) scores reflect better performance.

    Time frame: From baseline through year 3

07

Results

Posted Aug 22, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCocoa Extract + MultivitaminCocoa Extract + Multivitamin PlaceboCocoa Extract Placebo + MultivitaminCocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin Placebo
Started571553551587
Completed444441441462
Not completed127112110125
Withdrew: Death912910
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject51493746
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up67516469

Outcome measures

PrimaryGlobal Cognitive Function: Average Change Over Follow-up From Baseline

A composite cognitive measure that averages individual test z-scores of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICSm) Total and Long, the Immediate and Delayed Story Recall tests, the Oral Trail Making A and B tests (log-transformed), the Category Fluency and Verbal Fluency tests, and the Number Span Backward and Forward tests. Scores are ordered so that better performance corresponds to higher positive scores. Longitudinal data are used to create a linear contrast for the primary analysis to compare the difference between the average of scores at Years 1, 2, and 3 and the baseline score, i.e. (z1+z2+z3)/3 - z0, where z's denote the composited measures at baseline and years 1-3. This contrast is fitted using a random effects model for repeated measures. The primary comparison is for the margins of the factorial design: active cocoa flavonal (with or without active multivitamin) versus placebo flavonal (with or without active multivitamin).

Time frame:
From Baseline through Year 3
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Global Cognitive Function: Average Change Over Follow-up From Baseline
score on a scaleCocoa Extract + MultivitaminCocoa Extract + Multivitamin PlaceboCocoa Extract Placebo + MultivitaminCocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin Placebo
Global Cognitive Function: Average Change Over Follow-up From Baseline0.24 ± 0.020.15 ± 0.020.20 ± 0.020.15 ± 0.02
Statistical analysis
  • Cocoa Extract + Multivitamin vs Cocoa Extract + Multivitamin Placebo vs Cocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin vs Cocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 (Not adjusted) · Mean from linear contrast: 0.03 · 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08Marginal effect of cocoa flavonal versus cocoa placebo based on the mean difference between linear contrasts.
SecondaryComposite Cognitive Function

A composite cognitive measure that averages individual test z-scores of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICSm) Total and Long, the Immediate and Delayed Story Recall tests, the Oral Trail Making A and B tests (log-transformed), the Category Fluency and Verbal Fluency tests, and the Number Span Backward and Forward tests. Scores are ordered so that better performance corresponds to higher positive scores. Longitudinal data are used to create a linear contrast for the primary analysis to compare the difference between the average of scores at Years 1, 2, and 3 and the baseline score, i.e. (z1+z2+z3)/3 - z0, where z's denote the composited measures at baseline and years 1-3. This contrast is fitted using a random effects model for repeated measures. The comparison for this secondary outcome is based on the margins of the factorial design to compare multivitamin (with or without cocoa flavonal) with multivitamin placebo (with or without cocoa flavonal)

Time frame:
From baseline through year 3
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Composite Cognitive Function
score on a scaleCocoa Extract + MultivitaminCocoa Extract + Multivitamin PlaceboCocoa Extract Placebo + MultivitaminCocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin Placebo
Composite Cognitive Function0.24 ± 0.020.15 ± 0.020.20 ± 0.020.15 ± 0.02
Statistical analysis
  • Cocoa Extract + Multivitamin vs Cocoa Extract + Multivitamin Placebo vs Cocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin vs Cocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin Placebo · Wald test · p = <0.05 (Not adjusted) · Mean difference of linear contrasts: 0.07 · 95% CI 0.02 to 0.12Marginal effects of multivitamin versus multivitamin placebo
SecondaryIncident Mild Cognitive Impairment

Mild cognitive impairment based on centralized adjudication of cognitive test scores and input from a proxy. Limited to participants free of mild cognitive impairment at baseline. Incidence over 3 years of follow-up.

Time frame:
From baseline through year 3
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment
ParticipantsCocoa ExtractCocoa Extract Placebo
Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment4763
Statistical analysis
  • Cocoa Extract vs Cocoa Extract Placebo · Regression, Cox · p = 0.15 (Not adjusted) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.76 · 95% CI 0.52 to 1.11Comparison group is placebo
SecondaryIncidence of Mild Cognitive Impairment Among Those Free at Baseline

Mild cognitive impairment based on central adjudication of test scores with input from proxies. Based on test scores administered annually across 3 years.

Time frame:
From baseline through year 3
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Mild Cognitive Impairment Among Those Free at Baseline
ParticipantsMultivitaminMultivitamin Placebo
Incidence of Mild Cognitive Impairment Among Those Free at Baseline5357
Statistical analysis
  • Multivitamin vs Multivitamin Placebo · Regression, Cox · p = 0.62 (Unadjusted) · Cox proportional hazard: 0.91 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.32Comparison group is placebo.
SecondaryExecutive Function

Average of z-scores for the following tests: Oral Trail Making Test - B (log-transformed), Category Verbal Fluency, Letter Verbal Fluency, Number Span Test (Backwards and Forward). Higher (positive) scores reflect better performance. Linear contrast of scores collected at baseline, year 1, year 2, and year 3: (z1+z2+z3)/3 - z0)

Time frame:
From baseline through year 3
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Executive Function
score on a scaleCocoa ExtractCocoa Extract Placebo
Executive Function0.06 ± 0.020.04 ± 0.02
Statistical analysis
  • Cocoa Extract vs Cocoa Extract Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.24 (Unadjusted) · Mean difference (net): 0.03 · 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08Cocoa Flavonal minus placebo
SecondaryEpisodic Memory

Average z-scores from Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified Delayed Word List, Story Immediate Recall, Story Delayed Recall. Higher (positive) scores reflect better performance. Annual test administrations.

Time frame:
From baseline through year 3
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Episodic Memory
score on a scaleCocoa ExtractCocoa Extract Placebo
Episodic Memory0.29 ± 0.020.27 ± 0.02
Statistical analysis
  • Cocoa Extract vs Cocoa Extract Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.41 (Unadjusted) · Median difference (final values): 0.03 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.09Cocoa flavonal minus placebo
SecondaryExecutive Function

Average of z-scores for the following tests: Oral Trail Making Test - B (log-transformed), Category Verbal Fluency, Letter Verbal Fluency, Number Span Test (Backwards and Forward). Higher (positive) scores reflect better performance. Tests administered annually.

Time frame:
From baseline through year 3
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Executive Function
score on a scaleMultivitaminMultivitamin Placebo
Executive Function0.08 ± 0.020.02 ± 0.02
Statistical analysis
  • Multivitamin · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.02 (Unadjusted) · Mean difference (net): 0.06 · 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11Multivitamin minus placebo
SecondaryEpisodic Memory

Average z-scores from Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified Delayed Word List, Story Immediate Recall, Story Delayed Recall. Higher (positive) scores reflect better performance.

Time frame:
From baseline through year 3
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Episodic Memory
score on a scaleMultivitaminMultivitamin Placebo
Episodic Memory0.31 ± 0.020.25 ± 0.02
Statistical analysis
  • Multivitamin vs Multivitamin Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.04 (Unadjusted) · Mean difference (net): 0.06 · 95% CI 0.002 to 0.126Multivitamin minus placebo

Adverse events

Collected over Across all follow-up -- 3 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cocoa Extract + Multivitamin———
Cocoa Extract + Multivitamin Placebo———
Cocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin———
Cocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin Placebo———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cocoa Extract + MultivitaminCocoa Extract + Multivitamin PlaceboCocoa Extract Placebo + MultivitaminCocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin PlaceboTotal
Mean72.7 ± 5.573.2 ± 5.672.9 ± 5.673.1 ± 5.773.0 ± 5.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cocoa Extract + MultivitaminCocoa Extract + Multivitamin PlaceboCocoa Extract Placebo + MultivitaminCocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin PlaceboTotal
Female3393303193601348
Male232223232227914
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cocoa Extract + MultivitaminCocoa Extract + Multivitamin PlaceboCocoa Extract Placebo + MultivitaminCocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin PlaceboTotal
American Indian/Alaska Native218213
Asian/Pacific Islander91210839
Black/African American40233434131
Hispanic1318152167
Multiracial/Unknown11226
Non-Hispanic White5064984825202006
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Cocoa Extract + MultivitaminCocoa Extract + Multivitamin PlaceboCocoa Extract Placebo + MultivitaminCocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin PlaceboTotal
United States5715535515872262
Global Cognitive Composite
Global Cognitive Composite(z-scores)Cocoa Extract + MultivitaminCocoa Extract + Multivitamin PlaceboCocoa Extract Placebo + MultivitaminCocoa Extract Placebo + Multivitamin PlaceboTotal
Mean-0.01 ± 0.990.02 ± 1.000.05 ± 1.02-0.05 ± 0.990.00 ± 1.00
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Wake Forest School of Medicine
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Baker LD, Rapp SR, Shumaker SA, Manson JE, Sesso HD, Gaussoin SA, Harris D, Caudle B, Pleasants D, Espeland MA; COSMOS-Mind Research Group. Design and baseline characteristics of the cocoa supplement and multivitamin outcomes study for the Mind: COSMOS-Mind. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Aug;83:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.019. Epub 2019 Jul 2. PubMed 31271875 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 15, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 11, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — COSMOS-Mind and COSMOS (parent trial, PI: Manson and Sesso) have data transfer procedures and protocols in place which use password protection and encryption, to permit seamless and secure exchange of information. Safety monitoring will be completed through the parent trial. The COSMOS-Mind staff will send all adverse events reported to them to the parent trial for reporting and follow-up. This data will be sent electronically only to approved users through a protected network.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03035201
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), Brigham and Women's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2017
Start date
Sep 2016
Primary completion
Feb 12, 2021
Completion
Feb 12, 2021
Results posted
Aug 22, 2023
Last update
Aug 22, 2023

Study contacts

Laura D Baker, PhD
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Mark A Espeland, PhD
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Stephen R Rapp, PhD
principal investigator · Co-Investigator Wake Forest School of Medicine
Sally A Shumaker, PhD
principal investigator · Co-Investigator Wake Forest School of Medicine
JoAnn E Manson, MD
principal investigator · Parent Study Principal Investigator/COSMOS Mind Co-Investigator Brigham and Women's Hospital
Howard Sesso, SCD, MPH
principal investigator · Parent Study Principal Investigator/COSMOS Mind Co-Investigator Brigham and Women's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion