ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03021083IONSYS PilotUpdated Apr 14, 2022

IONSYS Feasibility Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of IONSYS Patch in Spinal Injury, sponsored by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-14.

Sponsored by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was withdrawn
Contract not reached with sponsor
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The treatment of postoperative pain continues to be a challenge after posterior spinal fusions. There is considerable evidence demonstrating that a multi-modality approach including patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioids for postoperative pain management compared to conventional opioid analgesia provides a greater analgesic effect even when the amount of opioids consumed is similar between both groups. However, the PCA modality is often discontinued prior to all the patients' pain needs being met. The IONSYS system uses the concept of PCA-delivered narcotics and may be used for postoperative pain management.

Read the detailed description

Following posterior spinal fusions, many patients are treated with analgesics or other modalities for prolonged periods before choosing the surgical alternative. In addition, the narcotic-based anesthetic required for the procedure may induce postoperative hyperalgesia (1). Inadequate treatment of this pain can result in prolonged hospitalization, cardiopulmonary complications, and poor surgical outcome (2).

Pain during the immediate postoperative period is usually managed with IV narcotic PCA and then transitioned to a combination of long-acting and short-acting oral analgesics. Because of the requirement for continuous carrier fluid infusion, cumbersome pump technology restricting mobility and supervision by a dedicated pain team to control programming of the pump, the PCA modality is often discontinued prior to all the patients' pain needs being met.

The investigators' most recent study evaluated the addition of pregabalin to the pain regimen after spinal fusions. The study found that after the removal of the PCA modality, these patients had considerable pain during physical therapy (PT), and their pain was not improved with the addition of pregabalin.

The IONSYS system might alleviate some of the problems encountered with conventional PCA systems (3,4). The system is an iontophoretic transdermal (needleless) system preprogrammed to deliver upon activation 40 mcg fentanyl over a 10-minute period, with up to 6 doses per hour. The system performs for 24 hours. The drug is embedded in a matrix gel and is only delivered when a current is propagated between the two poles of the system. Other than the usual narcotic side effects, the only specific side effect is a local dermatological reaction to the patch (5% had a rash, which cleared after removal). The system was designed with fentanyl, since hydromorphone cannot be incorporated in this type of matrix. Unlike hydromorphone, fentanyl is quick acting and doesn't hang around. The in-house chronic pain service currently puts many of their patients on IV fentanyl, because of the belief that it works when they have pain but is quickly metabolized.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Injury

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lumbar multi-level fusions
  • Patient Controlled Analgesia
  • Fentanyl
  • Opioid Analgesia
03

In context

Spinal Injuries

57 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Injuries; 15 are open to participants now.

Browse Spinal Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York is the lead sponsor of 226 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18-70 years old undergoing elective multi-level lumbar-sacral posterior spinal fusions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic pain patients taking more than 20-mg equivalents of oxycodone daily
  • Allergy to either hydromorphone or fentanyl
  • Other chronic orthopedic pain complaints, which will confound the results of the study
  • Issues with cognitive ability
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IONSYS Administration

    Patients who have elective multi-level spinal fusions under general anesthesia (who do not receive methadone) will be enrolled. In addition, all patients will receive Pepcid 20 mg, dexamethasone 10 mg, and ondansetron 4 mg. When patients will arrive in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), pain will initially be controlled with IV hydromorphone to achieve an NRS score of 3 or less. Once transferred to the step down unit (SDU), the IONSYS patch will be applied. IONSYS should be utilized when they have pain, but rescue analgesia will be available. If severe pain continues, the chronic pain service will be consulted, to potentially change the medications. Patients will be assessed for pain at rest and with PT in the AM and PM of POD 1 and POD 2. The IONSYS system will be discontinued after 48 hours, and a total dose of fentanyl received per 24 hours will be recorded. PT milestones for discharge will be assessed on the afternoon of POD 1 and POD 2.

    Device: IONSYS Patch

Interventions

  • DeviceIONSYS Patch

    Patient controlled transdermal fentanyl patch, IONSYS, applied to patient in place of a PCA.

    Also known as: Patient Controlled Transdermal Fentanyl Patch

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of IONSYS system

    1. Nursing assessment regarding the ease of setup and initiation of the IONSYS system (With regard to setup and initiation of the IONSYS, on a scale of 0-10, where 0=worst and 10=best, how would the nurse rate the system?). This will be given to the nurse who sets up the device on DOS, and nurse who sets up the device on POD 1, and the day nurse on POD 2. An average score of 7 will be considered feasible.

    Time frame: Day 2 following surgery for each patient

  2. NRS Pain Scores

    1. NRS pain (0-10 scale) on first day after surgery (POD 1) during the afternoon session of PT. In a previous study on similar patients with IV PCA, we recorded mean pain scores of 4.6 during PT. Adequate pain control is delineated as NRS ≤ 3

    Time frame: Day 1 following surgery for each patient

Secondary outcomes

  1. Day of eligibility for discharge,

    1. Day of eligibility for discharge, as assessed by a physical therapist's observation of a patient's ability to walk at least 20 feet and climb 4 stairs. Will be delineated as either AM or PM on a day following surgery, since PT is conducted twice daily.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after surgery

  2. A Oswestry Back Pain Disability Index questionnaire

    An Oswestry Back Pain Disability Index questionnaire will be conducted at the first postoperative office visit to assess whether improved pain control in the hospital had an effect on the post-discharge recovery of the patient.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after surgery at the Post-Op Office Visit

  3. Level of Sedation

    Level of sedation, as assessed by PT starting on POD1 at the initiation of PT using the University of Michigan sedation scale: (1) awake and alert; (2) minimally sedated; (3) moderately sedated; (4) deeply sedated; (5) unarousable

    Time frame: POD1

  4. Presence of Nausea of Vomiting

    Assess whether the patient has post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    Time frame: POD1 and POD2 after surgery

  5. Satisfaction Survey

    A satisfaction survey will be conducted prior to discharge from the hospital. It will include the following questions: (1) Was the patient's pain adequately treated? (Y/N); (2) What was the patient's worst pain level after surgery? (0-10 scale); (3) Was the IONSYS device explained? (Y/N); (4) Did the patient have side effects to the IONSYS? (Y/N); (5) Was the patient able to perform PT? (Y/N); (6) Overall satisfaction with IONSYS device (0-10 scale; 0=not satisfied; 10=most satisfied).

    Time frame: Up to 1 week

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):991-1004. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu137. PubMed 24829420 ↗
  • White PF. The changing role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5 Suppl):S5-S22. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000177099.28914.A7. PubMed 16334489 ↗
  • Scott LJ. Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System: A Review in Acute Postoperative Pain. Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Apr;36(4):321-30. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0387-x. PubMed 26968174 ↗
  • Mayes S, Ferrone M. Fentanyl HCl patient-controlled iontophoretic transdermal system for the management of acute postoperative pain. Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Dec;40(12):2178-86. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H135. PubMed 17164395 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03021083
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 13, 2017
Start date
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2017
Completion
Nov 1, 2017
Last update
Apr 14, 2022

Study contacts

Michael Urban, M.D.
principal investigator · Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion