CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06590402Updated Oct 6, 2025

Anterior Femoral and Adductor Canal Nerve Blocks in Peds Knees

A Phase 4 interventional study of Bupivacaine, Dexamethasone in Adductor Canal Block and Bupivacaine, Dexamethasone in Anterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction, sponsored by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-06.

Sponsored by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York · Phase 4, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to compare anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block (AFCN) to adductor canal block ACB) for pediatric patients undergoing either anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). The aims of this trial are:

  • To measure postoperative functional outcomes in patients who received AFCNB vs. ACB.
  • To calculate postoperative opioid requirements in pediatric knee surgeries that received AFCNB vs. ACB.
  • To calculate pain intensity levels at rest and with ambulation in patients who received AFCNB vs. ACB.
  • To quantify sensory deficits in patients who received AFCNB vs. ACB.
  • To assess patient-reported outcome measures (e.g., pain expectation scale, pain management satisfaction, PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 - Physical Activity, PROMIS Scale v1.2 - Global Health) in patients 8-18 years of age who received AFCNB vs. ACB.

Subjects undergoing ACL procedures will be compared between those who received the adductor canal block to those who received the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block. The researchers will also compare individuals who underwent MPFL procedures and received an anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block with those who received the adductor canal block.

Participants will:

  • Be randomized to receive either the AFCNB or ACB in addition to standard of care analgesia.
  • Maintain a patient diary to document daily pain meds/pain scores
  • Complete follow up surveys/questionnaires via telephone and during their office visits with surgeons.
Read the detailed description

There is scant literature on the efficacy of peripheral nerve blocks or the comparative effectiveness of anesthesia and analgesia techniques in pediatric/adolescent patients undergoing orthopedic procedures, particularly ambulatory knee procedures such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Given the innervation to the knee and concern with residual functional impairment, the goal of our pilot study is to collect preliminary information comparing the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block (AFCNB) vs adductor canal block (ACB), in the hopes of using this data to power a larger randomized controlled trial to rigorously study this clinical question.

This pilot clinical trial aims to find out what the differences are between anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block (AFCN) and adductor canal block (ACB) for pediatric patients who are having either anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) surgery. There will be 30 subjects in each group/type of surgery. The aims of this trial are:

  • To measure postoperative functional outcomes in patients who received AFCNB vs. ACB.
  • To calculate postoperative opioid requirements in pediatric knee surgeries that received AFCNB vs. ACB.
  • To calculate pain intensity levels at rest and with ambulation in patients who received AFCNB vs. ACB.
  • To quantify sensory deficits in patients who received AFCNB vs. ACB.
  • To assess patient-reported outcome measures (e.g., pain expectation scale, pain management satisfaction, PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 - Physical Activity, PROMIS Scale v1.2 - Global Health) in patients 8-18 years of age who received AFCNB vs. ACB.

    30 Subjects undergoing ACL procedures will be compared between those who received the adductor canal block (15) to those who received the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block (15). The researchers will also compare 30 individuals who underwent MPFL procedures and received an anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block (15) with those who received the adductor canal block (15).

Eligible and enrolled participants will:

  • Be randomized to receive either the AFCNB or ACB in addition to standard of care analgesia.
  • Maintain a patient diary to document daily pain meds/pain scores
  • Complete follow up surveys/questionnaires via telephone and during their office visits with surgeons.
02

Conditions studied

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
  • Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York is the lead sponsor of 217 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Of its 27 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 8-18 years old at the time of surgery
  • Patients 40kg and above
  • ACL reconstruction of MPFL reconstruction surgery with participating surgeons

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • revision surgery
  • bilateral surgery
  • general anesthesia
  • contraindications to any part of the study protocol
  • relevant pre-existing neurological deficit
  • chronic pain
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) surgeries

    Pediatric subjects who underwent a Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) surgery and are randomized to receive either the adductor canal block (ACB) or the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block (AFCNB).

    Drug: Bupivacaine, Dexamethasone in Adductor Canal Block · Drug: Bupivacaine, Dexamethasone in Anterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block

  • Experimental
    Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) surgeries

    Pediatric subjects who underwent a Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) surgery and are randomized to receive either the adductor canal block (ACB) or the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block (AFCNB).

    Drug: Bupivacaine, Dexamethasone in Adductor Canal Block · Drug: Bupivacaine, Dexamethasone in Anterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block

Interventions

  • DrugBupivacaine, Dexamethasone in Adductor Canal Block

    0.25% 15-20ml bupivacaine (local anesthestic) delivered as part of the adductor canal block with 2 mg preservative-free dexamethasone (corticosteroid) delivered as part of the adductor canal block

    Also known as: Adductor Canal Block (ACB)

  • DrugBupivacaine, Dexamethasone in Anterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block

    10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (local anesthetic) delivered as part of the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block with 2 mg preservative-free dexamethasone (corticosteroid) delivered as part of the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block

    Also known as: Anterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block (AFCNB)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Function (Motor strength in quadriceps)

    Collected at standard of care postoperative clinical visits with surgeon. Quadriceps strength is measured bilaterally by a handheld dynamometer.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cumulative opioid consumption (MMEs)

    Opioids administered to or consumed by patient in the first 48 hours after surgery (starting from "PACU in" time to 48 hours after "PACU in" time)

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  2. Total opioid consumption (MMEs)

    defined as cumulative opioid consumption (in MME) from PACU transfer in time to 7 days postoperatively and from PACU transfer in time to 14 days postoperatively

    Time frame: at postoperative day 7 & 14

  3. Opioid consumption

    defined as any opioid consumption at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months postoperatively

    Time frame: at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  4. Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest

    Defined on a scale of 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: preop (baseline); every 30 minutes beginning from PACU transfer in time to discharge; at 6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months postoperatively

  5. Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) with ambulation

    Defined on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: preop (baseline); in PACU; at 6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months postoperatively

  6. Postoperative pain location(s)

    Collected at standard of care postoperative clinical visits (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months). Will be collected on a knee dermatomal map (with incisions depicted) with location(s) of pain marked and average pain scores at each location

    Time frame: at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  7. Pain expectation scale

    patient reported on a scale of less, same, or more \[or unknown\] than expected. With "less" being the lower score and "more" being the higher score.

    Time frame: at postoperative days 1, 2, 7, and 14

  8. Satisfaction with pain management

    measured on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is very dissatisfied and 10 is very satisfied with the pain management regimen.

    Time frame: at postoperative days 1, 2, 7, and 14

  9. postoperative sensation

    collected at standard of care postoperative clinical visits (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months). Will be measured on a knee dermatomal map (with incisions depicted) and classified as "normal," "decreased," or "paresthesia" when compared to the contralateral knee.

    Time frame: at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months

  10. postoperative function - motor strength in quadriceps

    collected at standard of care postoperative clinical visits with surgeon; quadriceps strength: measured bilaterally by handheld dynamometer

    Time frame: at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months

  11. postoperative function - range of motion (ROM)

    collected at standard of care postoperative clinical visits with surgeon; range of motion (ROM): measured bilaterally by goniometer

    Time frame: at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  12. postoperative function - Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function.

    collected at standard of care postoperative clinical visits with surgeon; physical function: PROMIS. If the patient is less than 18 years of age, will be assessed using the PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 - Physical Activity, which contains questions regarding performance of activities such as exercise and play in the past 7 days with 5 answer choices: no days, 1 day, 2-3 days, 4-5 days, and 6-7 days. If the patient is 18 years of age, will be assessed using the PROMIS Scale v1.2 - Global Health, which contains questions regarding physical and mental health rated 1-5, where 1 is worst and 5 is best (physical raw, T, and health scores will be calculated).

    Time frame: at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital for Special Surgery
    New York, New York 10021, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Liu SS, Strodtbeck WM, Richman JM, Wu CL. A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2005 Dec;101(6):1634-1642. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000180829.70036.4F. PubMed 16301234 ↗
  • Wang C, Liu LD, Bai X. Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Current Status and Trends of Postoperative Pain in Children from 1950-2021. J Pain Res. 2022 Oct 14;15:3209-3222. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S380842. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36267350 ↗
  • Micalizzi RA, Williams LA, Pignataro S, Sethna NF, Zurakowski D. Review of outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament repairs with regional nerve blocks. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):670-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 13. PubMed 25089833 ↗
  • Walker BJ, Long JB, Sathyamoorthy M, Birstler J, Wolf C, Bosenberg AT, Flack SH, Krane EJ, Sethna NF, Suresh S, Taenzer AH, Polaner DM, Martin L, Anderson C, Sunder R, Adams T, Martin L, Pankovich M, Sawardekar A, Birmingham P, Marcelino R, Ramarmurthi RJ, Szmuk P, Ungar GK, Lozano S, Boretsky K, Jain R, Matuszczak M, Petersen TR, Dillow J, Power R, Nguyen K, Lee BH, Chan L, Pineda J, Hutchins J, Mendoza K, Spisak K, Shah A, DelPizzo K, Dong N, Yalamanchili V, Venable C, Williams CA, Chaudahari R, Ohkawa S, Usljebrka H, Bhalla T, Vanzillotta PP, Apiliogullari S, Franklin AD, Ando A, Pestieau SR, Wright C, Rosenbloom J, Anderson T; Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network Investigators. Complications in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia: An Analysis of More than 100,000 Blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network. Anesthesiology. 2018 Oct;129(4):721-732. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002372. PubMed 30074928 ↗
  • Yee EJ, Gapinski ZA, Ziemba-Davis M, Nielson M, Meneghini RM. Quadriceps Weakness After Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block: A Multivariate Analysis of 1,083 Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 6;103(1):30-36. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01425. PubMed 33079899 ↗
  • Zhao XQ, Jiang N, Yuan FF, Wang L, Yu B. The comparison of adductor canal block with femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):745-54. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2194-1. Epub 2016 Jun 4. PubMed 27262287 ↗
  • Kuang MJ, Ma JX, Fu L, He WW, Zhao J, Ma XL. Is Adductor Canal Block Better Than Femoral Nerve Block in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? A GRADE Analysis of the Evidence Through a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3238-3248.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 17. PubMed 28606458 ↗
  • Jiang X, Wang QQ, Wu CA, Tian W. Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Orthop Surg. 2016 Aug;8(3):294-300. doi: 10.1111/os.12268. PubMed 27627711 ↗
  • Abdallah FW, Brull R, Joshi GP; Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA). Pain Management for Ambulatory Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evidence-Based Recommendations From the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2019 Apr;128(4):631-640. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003976. PubMed 30649069 ↗
  • Abdallah FW, Whelan DB, Chan VW, Prasad GA, Endersby RV, Theodoropolous J, Oldfield S, Oh J, Brull R. Adductor Canal Block Provides Noninferior Analgesia and Superior Quadriceps Strength Compared with Femoral Nerve Block in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Anesthesiology. 2016 May;124(5):1053-64. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001045. PubMed 26938989 ↗
  • Christensen JE, Taylor NE, Hetzel SJ, Shepler JA, Scerpella TA. Isokinetic Strength Deficit 6 Months After Adductor Canal Blockade for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Nov 8;5(11):2325967117736249. doi: 10.1177/2325967117736249. eCollection 2017 Nov. PubMed 29152521 ↗
  • Frazer AR, Chausse ME, Held M, St-Pierre C, Tsai CY, Preuss R, Descoteaux N, Chan M, Martineau PA, Veilleux LN. Quadriceps and Hamstring Strength in Adolescents 6 Months After ACL Reconstruction With Femoral Nerve Block, Adductor Canal Block, or No Nerve Block. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 22;9(7):23259671211017516. doi: 10.1177/23259671211017516. eCollection 2021 Jul. PubMed 34368383 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 1, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06590402
Lead sponsor
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Jun 6, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2025

Study contacts

Marko Popovic
Contact
popovicm@hss.edu
646-797-8948
Alex Sideris, PhD
Contact
Siderisa@hss.edu
212-774-2602
Kathryn DelPizzo, MD
principal investigator · Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion