CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03008564Updated Dec 7, 2017

Adductor Canal Block Ultrasound Anatomy in Volunteers

An observational study in Adductor Canal Block and Postop Analgesia for Knee, sponsored by University of Iowa. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-07.

Sponsored by University of Iowa · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There has been dispute about the location at which the adductor canal block should be performed (3-6). Two Common approaches have been used for ultrasound guided adductor canal blocks with the 'point of entry' being:

  1. Point A: midway point between the ASIS and base of patella
  2. Point B: Point which is 2-3 cm proximal to the site where the femoral artery becomes the popliteal artery as it traverses away from the sartorius muscle towards the femur at the adductor hiatus (2)

We want to determine ultrasound anatomy in healthy volunteers by:

  1. Measuring the distance between Point A and Point B
  2. Studying the ultrasound anatomy at Point A and B - Determine their location with respect to the adductor canal and femoral triangle.

This will allow us to determine which is the best site for performing an adductor canal block

Read the detailed description

It is important to answer the primary question because of the variable length of the adductor canal and we would like to determine the optimal position to perform the adductor canal block.

The adductor canal typically contains the saphenous nerve, nerve to vastus medialis muscle and on occasion, the obturator nerve (1). The roof of adductor canal is the vasto-adductor membrane and its length is reported to range from 5.5 cm to 15 cm with a mean of 7.6 cm2 and would suggest the length of the AC is variable. We would like to determine the length of the AC with the use of ultrasound. The AC would be determined to begin at the apex of the femoral triangle and end just proximal to the adductor hiatus. The length and location of the AC would be important to characterize as the volume of local anesthetic used and associated quadriceps weakness could be of significance in a shorter AC.

There has been dispute about the location at which the adductor canal block should be performed (3-6). Point A has been disputed to be within the femoral triangle and would therefore be a femoral nerve block as suggested by a small body of evidence (4-5). Clinically, it is unclear if there is a difference between quadriceps muscle weakness between the two approaches although it could be hypothesized placing a block at point A would lead to more quadriceps muscle weakness. With information gathered from this study, we plan to perform a clinical study by performing the nerve blocks at these two points with different volumes of local anesthetic and compare the amount analgesia and motor weakness between the two different approaches.

60 Volunteers (30 male and 30 female) aged between 18 to 75 years with a body mass index of 18 to 35 kg/m2 will be included in this study. Volunteers with previous surgery or deformities of the lower extremity will be excluded from the study

This is an observational study without a control group. Several reference points will be marked by anatomical landmarks and/or ultrasound:

A. the anterior superior iliac spine (landmark); B. the base of the patella (landmark); C. apex of femoral triangle (ultrasound); and D. distal most portion of adductor canal (Point B described earlier; ultrasound).

The primary outcome measure we are looking at is the distance between Point A and Point B.

We also plan to measure the distance (in centimeters) from:

  1. Base of patella to Point A
  2. Base of patella to Point B
  3. Apex of the femoral triangle
02

Conditions studied

  • Adductor Canal Block
  • Postop Analgesia for Knee
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Iowa is the lead sponsor of 276 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Of its 44 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 39 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

We aim to recruit volunteers who principally are healthcare employees at UIHC who mainly work in the Main Operating Rooms and Ambulatory Surgical Center Operating Rooms, mainly due to ease of access to ultrasonographic equipment. The subjects include anesthesiologists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, residents, interns, nurses, volunteers, technicians, administrative staff and other members of staff working in these areas.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 18-75 years, body mass index 18-35 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no previous surgery or complaints from the lower extremity region
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherUltrasound scanning of the lower limb in volunteers

    Several reference points will be marked by anatomical landmarks and/or ultrasound: the anterior superior iliac spine; base of patella; apex of the femoral triangle A measuring tape will be used to measure the anterior superior iliac spine (landmark); the base of the patella (landmark); apex of femoral triangle (ultrasound); and distal most portion of adductor canal (Point B described earlier; ultrasound). We will then measure the ASIS to: 1) base of patella; 2) apex of femoral triangle; and 3) Point B. We will repeat the same procedure on the opposite leg. Once complete, the volunteer will be allowed to dress and leave. The procedure should take approximately 10-20 minutes for each volunteer. The following things will be recorded for each subject: * Age * Gender * Weight * Height * BMI * Distance of ASIS to base of patella * Distance of Point A to base of patella * Distance of Point B to base of patella * Distance of apex of femoral triangle to base of patella

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measurement 1

    The distance in cm between Point A and Point B

    Time frame: One time assessment done during Ultrasound scanning of the lower extremity

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measurement 2

    The distance in cm between Point A and base of patella

    Time frame: One time assessment done during Ultrasound scanning of the lower extremity

  2. Measurement 3

    The distance in cm between Point B and base of patella

    Time frame: One time assessment done during Ultrasound scanning of the lower extremity

  3. Measurement 4

    The distance in cm between Apex of femoral triangle and base of patella

    Time frame: One time assessment done during Ultrasound scanning of the lower extremity

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    Iowa City, Iowa 52246, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Pedersen EM, Borglum J. Defining adductor canal block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):253-4. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000052. No abstract available. PubMed 24747312 ↗
  • Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Apaydin N, Oakes WJ, Salter EG. Anatomy and potential clinical significance of the vastoadductor membrane. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007 Oct;29(7):569-73. doi: 10.1007/s00276-007-0230-4. Epub 2007 Jul 7. PubMed 17618402 ↗
  • Jaeger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, Hilsted KL, Bjerregaard J, Gyrn J, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):526-32. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000015. PubMed 24121608 ↗
  • Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Pedersen EM, Borglum J. Redefining the adductor canal block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;39(5):442-3. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000119. No abstract available. PubMed 25140514 ↗
  • Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. Basic Topography of the Saphenous Nerve in the Femoral Triangle and the Adductor Canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):391-2. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000261. No abstract available. PubMed 26079358 ↗
  • Manickam B, Perlas A, Duggan E, Brull R, Chan VW, Ramlogan R. Feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided block of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):578-80. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbf84. PubMed 19916251 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03008564
Lead sponsor
University of Iowa
Responsible party
Yatish Siddapura Ranganath (Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Iowa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 2, 2017
Start date
May 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 16, 2017
Completion
Jun 16, 2017
Last update
Dec 7, 2017

Study contacts

Amanda Yap, MBBS
principal investigator · 319-356-1616

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion