CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03001661SOLVEUpdated Jul 15, 2021

An RCT of a Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator for Induction of Labour in Comparison to Dinoprostone Vaginal insErt

A Phase 3 interventional study of Dilapan-S and Dinoprostone in Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn, sponsored by Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 16 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-15.

Sponsored by Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
674
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Induction of labour (where labour is started artificially) is traditionally carried out with a range of different drugs or by surgery (rupturing the membranes or 'waters'). Dilapan-S is a mechanical device, known as an osmotic cervical dilator, which provides an alternative to drugs or surgery. Thin rods of an absorbent material (no active drug present) are inserted into the neck of the womb (cervix) and, as they absorb fluid, they swell and mimic the natural process of 'ripening' (or preparing) the cervix. This initial process is important before contractions begin. Unlike drugs, Dilapan-S does not cause premature contractions that, when too frequent, may cause the baby to become distressed. The project will compare cervical ripening using Dilapan-S with the standard use prostaglandin drug. Women with a single pregnancy, who require induction of labour, and who are not considered high risk, will be invited to participate. Investigators hope to recruit 860 women from UK maternity units over 2 years. Participants will have an equal chance of being randomised to the drug, which is standard practice, or the cervical dilator. The speed in which labour commences, the mode of delivery and any side effects will be compared. Importantly, investigators shall also assess patient satisfaction and anxiety during the induction process, by asking participants to complete a short questionnaire about their experience before they go home after having their baby. If osmotic dilators are effective investigators expect NICE to consider them an option alongside other cervical ripening methods.

Read the detailed description

Prospective, Phase III, UK, Open, Multicentre, Superiority, Randomised Controlled Trial of a CE marked medical device and an Investigational Medicinal Product (CTIMP).

Potentially eligible patients will be identified by their obstetrician or midwife, based on the need for induction of labour. Once the decision to induce labour is made, women will be approached to participate in the trial and will be given a patient information leaflet (PIL) enclosed in the induction admission letter. Patients wishing to enter the trial will be confirmed for eligibility by an obstetrician. Prior to patients undertaking any trial-related procedures, informed consent will be obtained.

Participants will then be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either 1) synthetic osmotic cervical dilator or 2) a 10-mg controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert. Randomisation will be provided by a computer generated programme. A research assistant discloses the nature of the assignment only after enrolment. Investigators have calculated that 860 patients (430 in each arm) will need to be recruited over a 2 year period. Given the nature of the intervention, the SOLVE trial will not be a blinded trial.

Full data collection will be conducted for those patients giving informed consent, from medical records. This will include baseline data, and details of mother and child at birth. Patients will also be asked to complete a maternal satisfaction questionnaire before they are discharged. There will be no further follow-up of patients post-discharge from care unless a Serious Adverse Event requires this. If the patient withdraws her consent during the study, data collection will be stopped. Only anonymised data will be entered into the Case Report Forms (CRFs) by the study team. Details of all patients approached about the trial will be recorded on the trial Screening Log, and fully anonymised copies returned to the trials office for review.

02

Conditions studied

  • Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn

Keywords

  • Propess
  • Dilapan-S
  • Dinoprostone
  • Labour
  • Induction
  • Child birth
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Women must meet the following criteria prior to initiation of IoL:

  1. ≥ 16 years of age
  2. Able to provide informed consent
  3. Singleton pregnancy
  4. Indication for IoL
  5. Pregnancy ≥ 37.0 weeks (assessed as an agreed gestational age by ultrasound dating scan)
  6. Living fetus with vertex presentation
  7. Intact membranes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  1. Women already receiving oxytocin
  2. Diagnosis of fulminant preeclampsia / eclampsia
  3. Contraindication to DINOPROSTONE or DILAPAN
  4. If DINOPROSTONE for IoL is non-compliant with local policy
  5. Enrolled in other randomised controlled trials of an IMP or device for cervical ripening or induction of labour
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
674 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Propess

    Control intervention: Propess® (dinoprostone) Slow release vaginal drug delivery system (Prostaglandin E2).

    Drug: Dinoprostone

  • Experimental
    Dilapan-S

    Experimental intervention: DILAPAN-S® A synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for insertion into the cervical canal, using as many rods as necessary.

    Device: Dilapan-S

Interventions

  • DeviceDilapan-S

    DILAPAN-S® is a non-pharmacological synthetic rod, which is inserted into the cervical canal and through the internal os, for cervical ripening prior to induction. Its mode of action consists in the hydrophilic properties of the device absorbing fluids from surrounding tissue structures, thus expanding the volume of DILAPAN-S® sticks, usually within a 12-hour period. Subsequently it exerts radial pressure on the surrounding structures (cervix) to dilate progressively. Endocervical pressure on the cervix results not only in its mechanical dilatation but the pressure on the endocervical structures also stimulates the production of endogenous PGs and promotes cervical ripening through its collagenolytic action.

    Also known as: Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator

  • DrugDinoprostone

    Dinoprostone slow release 10mg vaginal insert is currently the standard method used for induction of labour in the NHS, particularly in nulliparous woman.

    Also known as: Propess

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Failure to achieve vaginal delivery

    To evaluate the efficacy of the use of the synthetic osmotic cervical dilator in cervical ripening, prior to induction of labour, in comparison to dinoprostone vaginal insert in the parameter of failure to achieve vaginal delivery

    Time frame: 1 year from study completion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Failure to achieve vaginal delivery within 24, 36 and 48 hours from randomisation

    Failure to achieve vaginal delivery within 24, 36 and 48 hours from randomisation

    Time frame: 24, 36 and 48 hours

  2. caesarean section

    caesarean section undertaken between randomisation and delivery of fetus. The maximum time period for use of trial induction methods is 64 hours for Propess and 24 for Dilapan-S, thus C-section should typically have taken place by these time periods.

    Time frame: 24 and 64 hours

  3. instrumental delivery

    instrumental delivery undertaken between randomisation and delivery of fetus. The maximum time period for use of trial induction methods is 64 hours for Propess and 24 for Dilapan-S, thus instrumental delivery should typically have taken place by these time periods.

    Time frame: 24 and 64 hours

  4. spontaneous delivery

    spontaneous delivery between randomisation and delivery of fetus. The maximum time period for use of intervention is 64 hours, so spontaneous labour should have taken place by this stage.

    Time frame: 0 - 64 hours

  5. Change in Bishop Score

    change in Bishop Score compared at initiation of cervical ripening (i.e. randomisation) and completion of cervical ripening (i.e. when treatment is completed at 12 or 24 hours with Dilapan-S, or at 24, 32, 56 or 64 hours with Propess; or once labour is initiated - whichever comes first)

    Time frame: 0 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 32 hours, 56 hours, 64 hours.

  6. Total duration of intervention received

    Total duration of intervention received (i.e. randomisation) and completion of cervical ripening (i.e. when treatment is completed at 12 or 24 hours with Dilapan-S, or at 24, 32, 56 or 64 hours with Propess; or once labour is initiated - whichever comes first)

    Time frame: 0 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 32 hours, 56 hours, 64 hours.

  7. Use of Oxytocin

    Use of Oxytocin for induction and/or augmentation of labour from randomisation to completion of induction (i.e. when treatment is completed at 12 or 24 hours with Dilapan-S, or at 24, 32, 56 or 64 hours with Propess; or once labour is initiated - whichever comes first)

    Time frame: 0 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 32 hours, 56 hours, 64 hours.

  8. Use of Analgesia

    Use of Analgesia during induction and/or labour (from randomisation until delivery of fetus).

    Time frame: 0 - 64 hours approx.

  9. Amniotomy undertaken

    Amniotomy undertaken for induction and/or augmentation of labour from randomisation to completion of induction (i.e. when treatment is completed at 12 or 24 hours with Dilapan-S, or at 24, 32, 56 or 64 hours with Propess; or once labour is initiated - whichever comes first)

    Time frame: 0 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 32 hours, 56 hours, 64 hours.

  10. maternal and neonatal safety: SAEs recorded from randomisation up to discharge, and resolution of SAE.

    maternal and neonatal safety: SAEs recorded from randomisation up to discharge, and resolution of SAE.

    Time frame: 0 hours up to discharge (typically 4 days for c-section) or resolution of SAE (approx 2 weeks).

  11. maternal satisfaction with cervical ripening

    maternal satisfaction with cervical ripening collected after delivery, prior to discharge.

    Time frame: 1hr to 4 days

  12. fetal status after delivery

    fetal status after delivery recorded on delivery of fetus

    Time frame: recorded on delivery of fetus

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Trust
    Birmingham, West Midlands B15 2TG, United Kingdom
07

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 4, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Feb 10, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Investigators will not be sharing individual patient data with other research studies

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03001661
Lead sponsor
Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
University of Birmingham, Medicem International CR s.r.o.
Responsible party
Professor Janesh Gupta (Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 23, 2016
Start date
Dec 19, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 6, 2021
Completion
Feb 6, 2021
Last update
Jul 15, 2021

Study contacts

Janesh Gupta, MD
principal investigator · Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion