CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02994914GERABELUpdated Feb 22, 2022

GEriatric Determinants of Curative RAdiotherapy Scheme Choice for Breast Cancer ELderly Patient Treatment Compliance and Tolerance

An interventional study of Onco Geriatric Evaluation in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne. Terminated at 3 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-22.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was terminated
Low rythm of inclusions
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
241
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study proposes an onco geriatric evaluation (Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities Of Daily Living, Mini Mental State Examination, mini Geriatric Depression Scale, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric, and " timed get up and go " tests) for elderly breast cancer patients. The score obtained at this evaluation will determine the radiotherapy scheme.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer for elderly women and represents the first mortality cause for them. Breast cancer incidence increases for elderly women and will become a major public health problem in the next years.

The principal therapeutic solution is the partial mastectomy associated to radiotherapy. However, the radiotherapy scheme and its role are debated for elderly patients. Hypo fractionated radiotherapy could be considered as an advantageous option.

The treatment duration (6,5 weeks) and direct and indirect fatigue (around 33 travels) are major cons. Thereby, for elderly patients, the selection of patients who will benefit from a shorter treatment could be really difficult. It would be interesting to define an objective scoring, predicting a bad or good tolerance and observance to the radiotherapy. Nowadays, onco geriatric evaluations are used to decide some treatment's decision, but no study compared different orientated radiotherapy schemes.

The present study proposes an onco geriatric evaluation leading to a score according to seven tests (Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities Of Daily Living, Mini Mental State Examination, mini Geriatric Depression Scale, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric, and " timed get up and go " tests). The score will then determine an adapted radiotherapy scheme.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer
  • Onco Geriatric Evaluation
  • Radiotherapy
  • Hypo fractionated radiotherapy
  • Normo fractionated radiotherapy
  • Large hypo fractionated radiotherapy
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 241 is above the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne is the lead sponsor of 578 studies on the registry; 128 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Woman more than 70 years old,
  • Patient carrying a breast cancer proven histologically and treated by radiotherapy in curative intent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Man,
  • Patient with metastatic cancer,
  • Patient with impossible follow-up at 6 months (planned relocation, patient support in another Center),
  • Patient under protection of justice or unable to give consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
241 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Score of the Onco Geriatric Evaluation between 200 et 160

    According to the score obtained with the onco geriatric evaluation, patients with a score between 200 and 160 will receive a normo fractionated radiotherapy (66 Grays in 33 fractions). This scheme of radiotherapy is already used in the clinical practice, but not allocated according to a score obtained at an oncogeriatric evaluation.

    Other: Onco Geriatric Evaluation

  • Experimental
    Score of the Onco Geriatric Evaluation between 159 et 120

    According to the score obtained with the onco geriatric evaluation, patients with a score between 159 and 120 will receive an hypo fractionated radiotherapy (42,56 Grays in 16 fractions). This scheme of radiotherapy is already used in the usual practice, but not allocated according to a score obtained at an oncogeriatric evaluation.

    Other: Onco Geriatric Evaluation

  • Experimental
    Score of the Onco Geriatric Evaluation inferior to 119

    According to the score obtained with the onco geriatric evaluation, patients with a score inferior to 119 will receive a large hypo fractionated radiotherapy (30 Grays in 5 weekly fractions). This scheme of radiotherapy is already used in the usual practice, but not allocated according to a score obtained at an oncogeriatric evaluation.

    Other: Onco Geriatric Evaluation

Interventions

  • OtherOnco Geriatric Evaluation

    Seven tests will be performed by an onco geriatrician : Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities Of Daily Living, Mini Mental State Examination, mini Geriatric Depression Scale, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric, and " timed get up and go " tests. Those tests lead to a score, and this score will determine the scheme of patients radiotherapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measure of the tolerance

    Tolerance is considered as " bad " if the score of the onco geriatric evaluation decreases of more than 20% from the initial evaluation to 6 months after the end of the rays. Tolerance is considered as "correct" in the other cases.

    Time frame: Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tolerance

    Specific tolerance will be evaluated by the number of radiation-induced toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.4) of I, II, III, and IV grades.

    Time frame: Month 6

  2. Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Quality of life will be assessed with the difference between the Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) score obtained before the radiotherapy and 6 months after the end of the radiation therapy.

    Time frame: Month 6

  3. Radiotherapy compliance

    Compliance is considered as "bad" if the treatment plan is interrupted for at least one day (for medical reason). Compliance is considered as "correct" in the other cases.

    Time frame: Month 6

  4. Correlation between tolerance and distance from the therapeutic center

    Correlation will potentially be established between patient general tolerance and the distance between home and radio therapeutic center.

    Time frame: Month 6

  5. Correlation between tolerance and way of transport

    Correlation will potentially be established between patient general tolerance and the way of transport used by the patient to go to the therapeutic center.

    Time frame: Month 6

  6. Correlation between tolerance and the number of concomitant treatments

    Correlation will potentially be established between patient general tolerance and the number of concomitant treatments.

    Time frame: Month 6

  7. Correlation between tolerance and the nature of concomitant treatments

    Correlation will potentially be established between patient general tolerance and the nature of concomitant treatments.

    Time frame: Month 6

  8. Correlation between tolerance and the supportive cares

    Correlation will potentially be established between patient general tolerance and the supportive cares performed.

    Time frame: Month 6

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux
    Le Puy-en-Velay, 43000, France
  • Groupement Hospitalier Portes de Provence
    Montelimar, 26216, France
  • Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth
    Saint-Priest en Jarez, 42270, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02994914
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Collaborators
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 16, 2016
Start date
Dec 5, 2016
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2020
Completion
Jun 26, 2020
Last update
Feb 22, 2022

Study contacts

Nicolas Magné, PhD
principal investigator · Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion