CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02975245Updated Sep 19, 2025

Short Term Genetic Effects of Chemotherapy on Male Germ Cells

An observational study in Cancer, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-19.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study will determine the short-term effects of chemotherapy on sperm DNA.The study involves the collection of semen sample through ejaculation prior to initiation of chemotherapy and up to three time points after initiation of chemotherapy.

Read the detailed description

While medical advances in the area of cancer treatment have successfully improved the overall detection and treatment of many cancers affecting men and women alike, these very treatment modalities can adversely affect their reproductive capacity.

Certain types of chemotherapy, such as alkylating agents, are notorious for placing patients at high risk for infertility. For men, the best recommendation for patients undergoing such therapy is to cryopreserve semen prior to initiation of chemotherapy. Unfortunately, this may not always occur. Some patients have been noted to present to discuss fertility preservation options after completing their first cycle of chemotherapy. In this situation, they will most likely still have sperm which was produced prior to chemotherapy that can be collected even if the stem cells producing the sperm have been damaged or destroyed. However, there are no national guidelines addressing this particular situation. Typically, physicians may advise men to avoid conception anywhere from three months to two years after the final dose of chemotherapy to ensure all exposed germ cells have passed through and only newly formed germ cells remain.

It is crucial to further assess the effects of chemotherapeutic agents on male germ cells in the short window of time between exposure and potential sterility. If a safe time frame could be determined to collect sperm after a single dose of chemotherapy, then these men could be given a second chance to retain their fertility potential.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer

Keywords

  • Male infertility
  • Germ cells
  • Chemotherapy
  • Sperm
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 204 across 1,683 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Males between the ages of 18 and 50 who are scheduled to undergo chemotherapy for medical indication.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be scheduled to undergo treatment with chemotherapeutic agents for a medical indication
  • Be able to produce semen samples prior to chemotherapy and one week after first round of chemotherapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Men who have previously been treated with chemotherapeutic agents.
  • Men with significant oligospermia or azospermia.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Men receiving chemotherapy

    Semen collection and analysis

    Procedure: Semen collection and analysis

Interventions

  • ProcedureSemen collection and analysis

    Semen sample will be collected prior to the initiation of chemotherapy and one week after the first round of chemotherapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the differences in DNA between sperm collected before chemotherapy to sperm collected after the first round of chemotherapy using whole exome sequencing.

    Sperm count test analyzes the health and viability of sperm, as it takes into account sperm number, motility, and morphology.

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. changes in sperm quality from sperm collected before the initiation of chemotherapy to sperm collected after first round of chemotherapy using sperm count test.

    Sperm count test analyzes the health and viability of sperm, as it takes into account sperm number, motility, and morphology.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Magee-Womens Hospital
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02975245
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Responsible party
Kyle Orwig (Professor, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 29, 2016
Start date
Feb 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2025
Completion
Apr 2025
Last update
Sep 19, 2025

Study contacts

Kyle Orwig, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh/University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion