ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02974400EviBaSUpdated May 9, 2019

Evaluation of Internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Self-help Treatments for People With Psychosis

An interventional study of Internet-based, CBT-oriented, guided self-help in Schizophrenia, Hallucinations and Persecutory Delusion, sponsored by University of Bern. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-09.

Sponsored by University of Bern · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
101
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder which is accompanied by an enormous individual and societal burden. Despite established efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), its dissemination into routine mental health care remains poor. National regulations such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline in the United Kingdom recommend that CBTp should be offered to every person with psychotic symptoms, but more than 50% do not receive even a single session of CBTp. In Germany, CBTp is virtually not represented in the psychotherapy health service. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in a self-help format has been proven feasible and effective in anxiety and depressive disorders. Recently, Internet-based (self-help) interventions are also deployed via smartphone apps. The feasibility of Internet-based treatments for people with schizophrenia is well documented for Internet-based interventions (e.g., medication management) and also reported for smartphone interventions. However, there is a dearth of empirical studies precluding a conclusive picture. As far as the investigators know, there is only one study encompassing 90 participants with psychosis that investigated an Internet-based intervention with symptom-specific, cognitive behavioral interventions, which is from the investigators' research group. The unique features of the proposed project are 1) the first-time evaluation of a symptom-oriented, CBTp-based self-help treatment for people with psychotic symptoms via Internet, enhanced with smartphone assistance. The study is set up as randomized controlled trial (RCT) with active treatment versus a wait-list control group. It evaluates a combined Internet-based guided self-help treatment for persecutory ideation and auditory verbal hallucinations. The active treatment condition consists of access to a self-help website including regular written electronic contact with a guide and access to smartphone-based interactive worksheets (apps). The trials combine the low-threshold advantages of an online approach (e.g., anonymity) with the virtues of a clinical trial (e.g., symptom assessment and diagnostic verification via Interview). The primary outcome measure is the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Secondary outcome measures include self-reported symptom measures (Paranoia Checklist; Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire revised), completion rates, drop-out from the intervention, general symptomatology, side-effects, and client satisfaction. The project will help to answer the empirical question whether CBTp-based interventions in a purely Internet-based self-help format are effective. Positive findings would pave the way for an easy-to-access treatment option for patients with psychotic symptoms who currently are deprived of psychotherapeutic treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia
  • Hallucinations
  • Persecutory Delusion

Keywords

  • internet-based intervention
  • e-mental health
  • cognitive behavioural intervention
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,563 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 491 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 101 is above the median of 71 across 2,944 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Bern is the lead sponsor of 209 studies on the registry; 47 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Electronic
  • Internet access
  • Adequate command of the German language
  • PANSS Suspiciousness/persecution >= 3 AND/OR PANSS hallucinations >=3
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or delusional disorder
  • Concurrent psychopharmacological treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute suicidality
  • Acute risk of endangering others
  • No emergency plan (with is formulated during the telephone interview)
  • Disease of the central nervous system with need for treatment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Internet-based guided self-help

    Internet-based, guided, CBT-oriented self-help treatment for persecutory ideation and auditory verbal hallucinations with access to a self-help website including regular written electronic contact with a guide and access to smartphone-based interactive worksheets (8 weeks)

    Behavioral: Internet-based, CBT-oriented, guided self-help

  • No intervention
    Wait-List

    Wait-list control group (8 weeks)

Interventions

  • BehavioralInternet-based, CBT-oriented, guided self-help

    The self-help program includes sessions regarding (1) cognitive model, (2) sleep hygiene, (3) mindfulness, (4) meta-cognition, (5) coping with voice hearing, (6) persecutory ideation, (7) worrying, (8) self-esteem, (9) depression, (10) social competence, and (11) relapse prevention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

    Kay et al. (1987); clinician administered

    Time frame: Change in PANSS from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Paranoia Checklist (PC)

    Freeman et al. (2005); self-report

    Time frame: Change in PC from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)

  2. Launay-Slade Hallucination Scale (LSHS)

    Bentall \& Slade (1985); self-report

    Time frame: Change in LSHS from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)

  3. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    Spitzer, Kroenke \& Williams, 1999; self-report

    Time frame: Change in PHQ-9 from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)

  4. Incongruence Scale (INK)

    Grosse Holtforth, Grawe \& Tamcan (2004); self-report

    Time frame: Change in INK from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)

  5. Quality of life (WHO-QOL)

    WHO; self-report

    Time frame: Change in WHO-QOL from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
  • University of Bern
    Bern, 3012, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Westermann S, Ruegg N, Ludtke T, Moritz S, Berger T. Internet-based self-help for psychosis: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Oct;88(10):937-950. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000602. Epub 2020 Aug 13. PubMed 32790453 ↗
  • Ludtke T, Platow-Kohlschein H, Ruegg N, Berger T, Moritz S, Westermann S. Mindfulness Mediates the Effect of a Psychological Online Intervention for Psychosis on Self-Reported Hallucinations: A Secondary Analysis of Voice Hearers From the EviBaS Trial. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 3;11:228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00228. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32308631 ↗
  • Ruegg N, Moritz S, Berger T, Ludtke T, Westermann S. An internet-based intervention for people with psychosis (EviBaS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1644-8. PubMed 29653532 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2016 to primary completion in Apr 2019, 28 months.

Of 753 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Schizophrenia, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 56. This study's 28 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 766 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 16, 2016
First posted
Nov 28, 2016
StartActual
Dec 6, 2016
Primary completionActual
Apr 16, 2019
CompletionActual
Apr 16, 2019
Last update
May 9, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02974400
Lead sponsor
University of Bern
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 28, 2016
Start date
Dec 6, 2016
Primary completion
Apr 16, 2019
Completion
Apr 16, 2019
Last update
May 9, 2019

Study contacts

Stefan Westermann, Dr
principal investigator · University of Bern
Steffen Moritz, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion