ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02967016Updated Jun 19, 2020Results posted

Physical Activity After a Normal Spontaneous or Cesarean Delivery

An interventional study of Actigraph in Postpartum Disorder, sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-19.

Sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

To the best of the investigators knowledge the average level of physical activity (PA) of parturients recovering from a cesarean delivery or after a normal spontaneous vaginal delivery (NSVD) remains unknown. Taking in consideration that parturients are in a hypercoagulable state and that obstetric venous thromboembolism (VT) is one of the most common causes of maternal morbidity and mortality, ambulation is of utmost importance to anesthesiologists as well as obstetricians. In order to promote mobility, first the investigators need to learn the average parturients level of physical activity in the immediate post-partum period and up to 48 hours after delivery. This information may help us promote mobility in the immediate postpartum period, particularly for those that underwent a cesarean delivery since they are at higher risk of VT.

Read the detailed description

Cesarean delivery is the most common surgery performed in the United States. Despite this fact, there is a paucity of literature looking into the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing this type of surgery. ERAS protocols have shown to improve recovery from surgery, decreasing complication and hospital length of stay. The pathway for enhanced recovery targets improving 3 factors that have been associated with increased hospital length of stay and complications. These factors are pain, immobilization and postoperative ileus. These factors, many times are inter-related. A patient in pain would tend not to ambulate as this may exacerbate the pain and discomfort. In order to alleviate pain, the patient would most likely receive an opioid for pain management and these medications are known to have undesirable side effects such as nausea, vomiting, sedation, respiratory depression, constipation and urinary retention. All of these adverse effects (AEs) may lead to complications or increased hospital length of stay.

To the best of the investigators knowledge the average level of physical activity (PA) of parturients recovering from a cesarean delivery or after a normal spontaneous vaginal delivery (NSVD) remains unknown. Taking in consideration that parturients are in a hypercoagulable state and that obstetric venous thromboembolism (VT) is one of the most common causes of maternal morbidity and mortality, ambulation is of utmost importance to anesthesiologists as well as obstetricians. In order to promote mobility, first we need to learn the average parturients level of physical acuity in the immediate post-partum period and up to 48 hours after delivery. This information may help us promote mobility in the immediate postpartum period, particularly for those that underwent a cesarean delivery since they are at higher risk of VT.

Given the lack of knowledge regarding the physical activity level of parturients in the postpartum period, the investigators have designed a pilot study to objectively measure their PA. Patients having a normal spontaneous vaginal delivery will serve as our control group. These patients are going through the same physiologic changes that their counterparts (CD patients) are going through, the only difference being the stress of surgery in the CD group.The use of Fitness trackers (i.e Fitbit(R), Actigraph GT3X +) has been used to measure and promote physical activity in a cardiac rehabilitation population, as well as in parturients self-identified as inactive. The investigators intend to use the Actigraph GT3X+ to measure the level of physical activity of 50 parturients (25 NSVD and 25 post CD). The information obtained, will help us tailor the anesthetic/analgesic management of parturients in such a way that promotes early ambulation and recovery. The investigators estimate that we need approximately a total of 50 patients, 25 per group to assess if there is a difference in the level of PA between parturients after a NSVD or CD. We will aim to recruit 60 patients 30 per group to account for missing data, protocol violations, equipment malfunction or patients drop outs.This will be a pilot, prospective study aimed at measuring the physical activity (PA) of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification I and II women aged 18 years and older, after a normal spontaneous vaginal (NSVD) or cesarean delivery (CD). Subjects will be ASA I and II women aged 18 years and older, knowing to have had either a NSVD or CD (under neuraxial anesthesia). After delivery, and assuring that mother and baby are stable, patients will be approached by a member of the study team to discuss the study and obtain informed consent. After obtaining informed consent, patients will be divided into Two (2) groups depending on the mode of delivery. Group 1 will be NSVD and group 2 will be CD patients. Patients will be provided with a fitbit- based Actigraph GT3X + hardware, 3 hours after delivery. Patients will be evaluated every 12 hours after delivery for a period of 48 hours. During these evaluation points, pain (visual analogue scores), factors affecting mobility, and level of satisfaction with their analgesia will be assessed. After 48 hours the Actigraph GT3X + will be interrogated and objective data, such as mean daily steps, will be obtained using the aforementioned software.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postpartum Disorder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Puerperal Disorders

40 studies on the registry are indexed under Puerperal Disorders; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 81 across 32 interventional studies indexed under Puerperal Disorders.

Browse Puerperal Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey is the lead sponsor of 506 studies on the registry; 131 are open to participants now.

Of its 39 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 31 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women 18-45 years old giving birth after receiving a neuraxial analgesia/anesthesia technique. classification 1-2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of chronic pain
  • Recent use of opioids (other than postpartum)
  • Emergency case requiring general anesthesia (GA) or conversion to GA
  • > 45
  • Need to perform more extensive surgery (i.e Hysterectomy) Need for the neonate to be admitted to NICU (This will prompt mothers to walk more frequently, and longer distances to visit the baby)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    normal spontaneous vaginal delivery

    Both groups will be asked to wear a fitness tracker (Actigraph GT3X+).

    Behavioral: Actigraph

  • Experimental
    Cesarean Delivery

    Both groups will be asked to wear a fitness tracker (Actigraph GT3X+).

    Behavioral: Actigraph

Interventions

  • BehavioralActigraph

    following delivery a ActiGraph will be offered to patients to track their steps

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Steps

    This will be measured in the numbers of steps registered by the accelerometer

    Time frame: from 6 hours the after delivery until discharge or 48 hours whatever happens first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Score at Rest

    This outcome will be measured using a visual analogue score (VAS). Patient will mark their pain on a 0-100 mm line with 0 been no pain and 100 mm worst pain.

    Time frame: 6 hours following delivery until 48 hours

  2. Satisfaction Scores

    This outcome will be measured using a visual analogue score (VAS). Patient will mark their satisfaction on a 0-100 mm line with 0 been not satisfied at all and 100 mm extremely satisfied.

    Time frame: 6 hours following delivery until 48 hours

07

Results

Posted Jun 19, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Small sample size. No standardized post-delivery ambulation protocol at any of the institutions.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNormal Spontaneous Vaginal DeliveryCesarean Delivery
Started2525
Completed2525
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimarySteps

This will be measured in the numbers of steps registered by the accelerometer

Time frame:
from 6 hours the after delivery until discharge or 48 hours whatever happens first
Reported as:
Mean · Steps
Steps
StepsCesarean DeliveryVaginal Delivery
6968 ± 9201771 ± 660
121652 ± 12063165 ± 1266
243421 ± 23145911 ± 2162
364919 ± 36788841 ± 3113
486306 ± 58359813 ± 3916
Statistical analysis
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.002
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = .0002
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = .0006
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.0006
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.03
SecondaryPain Score at Rest

This outcome will be measured using a visual analogue score (VAS). Patient will mark their pain on a 0-100 mm line with 0 been no pain and 100 mm worst pain.

Time frame:
6 hours following delivery until 48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale (0-100)
Pain Score at Rest
score on a scale (0-100)Cesarean DeliveryVaginal Delivery
625 ± 2414 ± 18
1227 ± 2322 ± 24
2428 ± 2213 ± 18
3636 ± 2215 ± 19
4823 ± 1912 ± 17
Statistical analysis
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.06
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = .30
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = .002
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.003
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = .02
SecondarySatisfaction Scores

This outcome will be measured using a visual analogue score (VAS). Patient will mark their satisfaction on a 0-100 mm line with 0 been not satisfied at all and 100 mm extremely satisfied.

Time frame:
6 hours following delivery until 48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale (0-100)
Satisfaction Scores
score on a scale (0-100)Cesarean DeliveryVaginal Delivery
671 ± 3478 ± 31
1269 ± 2980 ± 28
2460 ± 3283 ± 30
3658 ± 2995 ± 13
4857 ± 3289 ± 27
Statistical analysis
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = .43
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = .24
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = .012
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = <0.0001
  • Cesarean Delivery vs Vaginal Delivery · Kruskal-Wallis · p = .0005

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Normal Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Cesarean Delivery0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cesarean DeliveryVaginal DeliveryTotal
Mean31.6 ± 5.928.3 ± 6.030.0 ± 6.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cesarean DeliveryVaginal DeliveryTotal
Female252550
Male000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cesarean DeliveryVaginal DeliveryTotal
Black101424
White10919
Asian011
Other415
Not available101
Body Mass index
Body Mass index(Kg/m2)Cesarean DeliveryVaginal DeliveryTotal
Mean32 ± 6.331.4 ± 6.031.7 ± 6.1
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • George Washington University
    Washington, District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • University Hospital
    Newark, New Jersey 07103, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 19, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02967016
Responsible party
Dongchen Li, MD (Assistant Professor Director of Obstetric Anesthesia Department of Anesthesiology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 17, 2016
Start date
Apr 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2019
Completion
Aug 30, 2019
Results posted
Jun 19, 2020
Last update
Jun 19, 2020

Study contacts

Antonio Gonzalez-Fiol, MD
study director · Yale New Haven Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion