CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02957305MISO200Updated Apr 30, 2021Results posted

Misoprostol 400 µg Versus 200 µg for Cervical Ripening in 1st Trimester Miscarriage

A Phase 4 interventional study of Misoprostol 400mcg Tab and Misoprostol 200mcg Tab in Miscarriage in First Trimester, sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-30.

Sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
211
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Local current protocol for cervical ripening in 1st trimester miscarriage recommends 400 µg of misoprostol intravaginally 3 hours before uterine evacuation. This regime has been recommended by some international guidelines . So far, there are no recent studies comparing cervical dilatation between 400 µg of misoprostol and a reduced dose (e.g., 200 µg) for 6 hours. If cervical ripening is similar between these two regimens(i.e., 200µg regimen is not inferior to 400µg regimen), costs reductions and lower side effects may be issued without losing quality of cervix dilatation.

Read the detailed description

Miscarriage is defined by the World Health Organization as the interruption of the pregnancy up to 20-23 weeks, or the products of pregnancy weighing less than 500 grams (1). Nearly 15% of known pregnancies end in miscarriage, especially in the first 12 weeks. Estimates indicate that 68000 women die worldwide each year, as a result of unsafe abortions. Abortions are the major cause of maternal death, particularly in Latin America and the Caribbean. In cases of retained and incomplete abortions, uterine emptying is recommended. In the first trimester of pregnancy, either pharmacological or surgical procedure is accepted according to international guidelines.

Pharmacological treatment for uterine evacuation includes the administration of mifepristone and misoprostol or misoprostol alone. Nevertheless, surgical methods have been shown a greater acceptability and patient satisfaction due to a reduced incidence of adverse effects. Currently, Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) is the technique recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Health and the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

MVA should be performed after cervical ripening. This pre-surgical procedure makes the procedure safer and more effective. In Brazil, misoprostol is the most suitable drug to be used in these cases because of its efficacy, ease of use, low cost, stability at room temperature, and availability. Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog and can be administered by oral, sublingual, buccal, rectal, and vaginal routes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Miscarriage in First Trimester

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • misoprostol
  • miscarriage
03

In context

Abortion, Spontaneous

320 studies on the registry are indexed under Abortion, Spontaneous; 53 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 211 is above the median of 147 across 174 interventional studies indexed under Abortion, Spontaneous.

Browse Abortion, Spontaneous studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre is the lead sponsor of 450 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients admitted at the Gynecological emergency Unit at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre scheduled for uterine evacuation with \<12 weeks of gestation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who do not wish to participate in the project;
  • patients with ectopic pregnancy;
  • patients with comorbidities (heart failure congestive, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease);
  • patients with hypovolemic shock;
  • patients with cervical incompetence;
  • patients with infected miscarriage/abortion (presence of fever, pus from the cervix, leukocytosis [> 14000]);
  • patients with twin pregnancy;
  • patients with Marfan syndrome;
  • patients allergic to misoprostol;
  • patients with coagulopathy;
  • patients with opening of cervical internal os (4 mm of dilatation at the time of consultation);
  • patients with previous surgery of the cervix (conization);
  • patients with concomitant use of IUDs.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
211 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Misoprostol 400 µg

    Participants received misoprostol 400 µg: 2 tablets of misoprostol (200µg each) introduced into the vagina, at least 6 hours before the Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) procedure.

    Drug: Misoprostol 400mcg Tab

  • Experimental
    Misoprostol 200 µg

    Participants received misoprostol 200 µg: 1 tablet of misoprostol introduced into the vagina, at least 6 hours before the Manual Vacuum Aspiration procedure.

    Drug: Misoprostol 200mcg Tab

Interventions

  • DrugMisoprostol 400mcg Tab

    400µg of misoprostol (2 tablets)

    Also known as: Misoprostol control

  • DrugMisoprostol 200mcg Tab

    200µg of misoprostol (1 tablet)

    Also known as: Misoprostol comparator

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Required Cervix Dilation at Initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration

    this outcome identifies patients that had to have a mechanical dilator for opening the cervix to perform appropriate Manual Vacuum Aspiration

    Time frame: baseline at initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With a Presence of a Uterine Cervical Canal With ≥8 mm of Dilation

    This outcome measures how many mm of dilation the cervical canal has before the procedure. Cervical permeability (≥8 mm of dilation, used as a cut-off) was measured using Karman cannulas, from higher to low diameter.

    Time frame: Baseline before Manual Vacuum Aspiration procedure

Other outcomes

  1. Pain Score (VAS)

    Pain scores were assessed using a verbal analog scale (VAS), ranging from zero (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)

    Time frame: before Manual Vacuum Aspiration

07

Results

Posted Sep 3, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable. Pregnancies with less than 8 weeks had their procedures completely done with small diameter Karman cannulas

Participant flow

Participants with diagnosis of miscarriage and scheduled for Manual Vacuum Aspiration at the Gynecologic Emergency Unit of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, a tertiary teaching hospital, were recruited. The first participant was enrolled on December 21, 2016.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMisoprostol 400µgMisoprostol 200µg
Started106105
Completed106105
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Required Cervix Dilation at Initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration

this outcome identifies patients that had to have a mechanical dilator for opening the cervix to perform appropriate Manual Vacuum Aspiration

Time frame:
baseline at initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Required Cervix Dilation at Initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration
ParticipantsMisoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200 µg
It was necessary (inadequate cervix dilation)416
It was not necessary (adequate cervix dilation)10289
Statistical analysis
  • Misoprostol 400 µg vs Misoprostol 200 µg · difference between proportions · p = 0.025 (The null hypothesis: percentage of dilation with 400µg ≥ percentage of dilation with 200µg + 25% Alternative hypothesis: percentage of dilation with 400µg - 25% \< percentage of dilation with 200µg) · Treatment difference: 25difference between percentages and 95% confidence interval
  • Misoprostol 400 µg vs Misoprostol 200 µg · Chi-squared · p = 0.004 · Difference between proportions: 0.1146 · 95% CI 0.037 to 0.192The difference between both groups was 11.5% (95%CI = 3.7% to 19.2%)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Presence of a Uterine Cervical Canal With ≥8 mm of Dilation

This outcome measures how many mm of dilation the cervical canal has before the procedure. Cervical permeability (≥8 mm of dilation, used as a cut-off) was measured using Karman cannulas, from higher to low diameter.

Time frame:
Baseline before Manual Vacuum Aspiration procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Presence of a Uterine Cervical Canal With ≥8 mm of Dilation
ParticipantsMisoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200 µg
Inadequate (<8 mm)3050
Adequate (≥8 mm)7655
Other pre-specifiedPain Score (VAS)

Pain scores were assessed using a verbal analog scale (VAS), ranging from zero (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)

Time frame:
before Manual Vacuum Aspiration
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale - Verbal Analog Scale
Pain Score (VAS)
units on a scale - Verbal Analog ScaleMisoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200 µg
Pain Score (VAS)0 (0 to 10)0 (0 to 10)
Statistical analysis
  • Misoprostol 400 µg vs Misoprostol 200 µg · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.9 · Median difference (final values): 0 · 95% CI 0 to 0

Adverse events

Collected over From the MVA procedure until 6 hours after the procedure. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Misoprostol 400 µg0/106 (0%)0/106 (0%)1/106 (0.9%)
Misoprostol 200 µg0/105 (0%)0/105 (0%)3/105 (2.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMisoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200 µg
cervical lacerationReproductive system and breast disorders0/1062/105
uterine hemorrhageReproductive system and breast disorders1/1061/105

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Misoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200Total
Median30 (16 to 46)31 (15 to 49)30 (15 to 49)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Misoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200Total
Female106105211
Male000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Misoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200Total
Black292655
Brazilian indian011
White7677153
Asian112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Misoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200Total
Brazil106105211
Obstetric history
Obstetric history(cases)Misoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200Total
Gesta2 (1 to 8)2 (1 to 8)2 (1 to 8)
Para1 (0 to 7)1 (0 to 6)1 (0 to 7)
Miscarriages1 (1 to 7)1 (1 to 4)1 (1 to 7)
Time from misoprostol to procedure
Time from misoprostol to procedure(hours)Misoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200Total
Mean6.38 ± 1.476.37 ± 1.286.37 ± 1.39
Gestational age
Gestational age(weeks)Misoprostol 400 µgMisoprostol 200Total
Mean7 ± 1.47.1 ± 1.57.1 ± 1.5
08

Study locations

1 site
  • HCPA
    Porto Alegre, RS 90035-903, Brazil
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kapp N, Lohr PA, Ngo TD, Hayes JL. Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;(2):CD007207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007207.pub2. PubMed 20166091 ↗
  • Blanchard K, Clark S, Winikoff B, Gaines G, Kabani G, Shannon C. Misoprostol for women's health: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):316-32. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01701-x. PubMed 11814515 ↗
  • Marret H, Simon E, Beucher G, Dreyfus M, Gaudineau A, Vayssiere C, Lesavre M, Pluchon M, Winer N, Fernandez H, Aubert J, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Jonville-Bera AP, Clouqueur E, Houfflin-Debarge V, Garrigue A, Pierre F; College national des gynecologues obstetriciens francais. Overview and expert assessment of off-label use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynaecology: review and report by the College national des gynecologues obstetriciens francais. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Apr;187:80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Jan 31. PubMed 25701235 ↗
  • National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage: Diagnosis and Initial Management in Early Pregnancy of Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage. London: RCOG Press; 2012 Dec. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK132775/ PubMed 23638497 ↗
  • ACOG Committee Opinion. American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologist. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 283, May 2003. New U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling on Cytotec (misoprostol) use and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;101(5 Pt 1):1049-50. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00396-x. PubMed 12738178 ↗
  • Tang J, Kapp N, Dragoman M, de Souza JP. WHO recommendations for misoprostol use for obstetric and gynecologic indications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 May;121(2):186-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 19. PubMed 23433680 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Jun 28, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We intend to share raw data with other researchers

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02957305
Lead sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Responsible party
Ricardo Francalacci Savaris (Head of the Gynecologic Emergency Unit, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 6, 2016
Start date
Dec 21, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 19, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2020
Results posted
Sep 3, 2020
Last update
Apr 30, 2021

Study contacts

Ricardo F Ricardo, MD, PhD
principal investigator · HCPA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion