ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02955277TECHUpdated Mar 1, 2024Results posted

The Effectiveness of TECH: Tablet Enhancement of Cognition and Health

An interventional study of TECH: Tablet Enhancement of Cognition and Health protocol and Standard care or active standard care in Mild Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by Assuta Hospital Systems. Completed at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-01.

Sponsored by Assuta Hospital Systems · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study assess the effectiveness of novel cognitive intervention utilizing tablet apps (TECH protocol: Tablet Enhancement of Cognition and Health) to improve cognitive abilities, daily function and health-related quality of life of older adults with MCI. Older adults with MCI will be randomly allocated to the TECH protocol (experimental group) or standard care (control group). Assessments will be administered pre and post the 6-week TECH protocol and at 6-month follow-up by assessors blind to group allocation.

Read the detailed description

A single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted, by assessors blind to group allocation. Participants will be referred to the study from 'Maccabi Healthcare Services' by family physicians and geriatric physician of 'Maccabi Healthcare Services Central District'. The majority of TECH protocol training will take place in the participants' home as self-practice. The assessment and weekly group meetings will take place at clinics of Maccabi Healthcare Services in the Central District. A Helsinki approval (#2016009) has already been obtained. Participants will receive information regarding the study and if eligible will sign a consent form, undergo the screening and then the pre-intervention assessments. Then they will be randomly allocated into experimental or control group by a computer program (stratification of the severity of the cognitive decline according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores of above or below 23 points). The experimental group participants will receive the TECH protocol, while participants in the control group will continue to receive standard care. Following the intervention a second assessment will be performed, as well as six-months follow-up assessment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

  • Cognitive training
  • Tablet computers
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,872 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,119 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 61 is close to the median of 64 across 2,794 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Assuta Hospital Systems is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 65 and above.
  • Have MCI (as determined by the following four criterions: A. a score of 19-25 on the , B. subjective memory complaints, and report from an informant of the same memory complains (the informant should be a person who interacts with the participant three or more times a week), C. Informant report of the cognitive decline as newly acquired, D. independence in Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), as reported by the participants and the informant, excluding motor difficulties which are not caused due to neurological conditions or lack of performance with no changes compared to the past.
  • Have normal or corrected vision and hearing.
  • Speak, write and read Hebrew.
  • Able to understand and follow use of the touchscreen of a tablet after initial demonstration.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Experience severe depressive symptoms (10 points or more in The Geriatric Depression Scale)
  • Are diagnosed with dementia, or other neurological or psychiatric condition (such as stroke, Parkinson's disease).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TECH protocol

    TECH protocol - Daily self-training using tablet apps facilitated by weekly group sessions. The self-training will take place independently at participants' home and will include mostly playing puzzle-apps to train different cognitive components. Participants will be requested to play (and log) various apps three to five times a week for 30-60 minutes each time, for a total of 15-25 training sessions. In addition they will use the tablets for a variety of everyday uses. The individual self-training will be accompanied by six weekly sessions (of 60 minutes) in a small group setting (5-6 participants) led by an experienced occupational therapist.

    Other: TECH: Tablet Enhancement of Cognition and Health protocol

  • Active comparator
    standard care or active standard care

    Participants will receive standard occupational therapy with no TECH protocol. or Will receive active standard care: six weekly group sessions (60 minutes) for cognitive training using puzzle games. The setting will includes small groups of 5-6 participants, with no self training at home.

    Other: Standard care or active standard care

Interventions

  • OtherTECH: Tablet Enhancement of Cognition and Health protocol

    Cognitive training using touchscreen tablets (TECH protocol)

  • OtherStandard care or active standard care

    standard occupational therapy or 6-weekly group sessions playing board games and puzzles.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    A cognitive screening tool that assesses global cognition and includes the cognitive components: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuo-constructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Total score range from 0-30. A higher score indicates a better cognitive status. A score above 26 indicates normal cognition

    Time frame: pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. WebNeuro

    A computerized web-based battery assessment of neurocognitive functioning. The battery will include seven subtests that examine three cognitive domains: memory (Memory recognition/verbal list-learning task), executive planning (Switching of attention test, Verbal interference test, Maze test, Go-no-go test), and attention (Digit span test, Continuous performance test). A total thinking score will be calculated. Z score was calculated, providing a uniform comparison of the raw scores to a normative database, regardless of the original unit of measure used. The Z scores have a normative average of 0, with a standard deviation of 1, and no upper of lower limit. Positive values reflect better than average performance, and negative values reflect poorer than average performance.

    Time frame: pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months

  2. General Self-Efficacy Scale

    Designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs to cope with a variety of difficult demands in life. It consists 10 statements such as 'I can solve most problems if I invest the necessary effort'. Possible responses are scored 1-4 (1 - not at all true to 4 - exactly true), the total score range from 10 to 40. Higher scores represent higher levels of general selfefficacy.

    Time frame: pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months

  3. The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)

    SF-12 includes 12 questions from the SF-36 Health Survey. The SF-36 is a widely used and investigated, and validated instrument for measuring quality of life. The SF-12 was developed using normative data for the SF-36 in the United States. The shorter version designed to reproduce the Physical and the Mental Components Summary scores. A greater score indicates better health measures. The Physical Composite and Mental Composite will be calculated. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each subscale, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning

    Time frame: pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)

    Valid and reliable self-rating screening tool developed to detect depressive symptoms in elderly (D'ath, Katona, Mullan, Evans, \& Katona, 1994; Lesher \& Berryhill, 1994). The questionnaire includes 15 yes/no statements and takes up to10 minutes to complete. Total score ranges from 0-15. A higher score indicates a worse emotional state. Score above 10 points indicates the presence of depressive symptoms (Yesavage et al., 1983).

    Time frame: Pre intervention

  2. Structural and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    Changes in brain volume, activity, and white-matter integrity will be assessed by MRI whole brain scanning. MRI scans will be performed on a 3T Prisma Siemens scanner at the Alfredo Federico Strauss Center for Computational Neuroimaging at Tel Aviv University. The MRI scans will include: two short structural assessments - magnetization prepared - rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) - diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI) (while participants perform the N-back test). 12 Participants allocated to the TECH intervention (experimental group) will be offered to undergo pre and post MRI scans.

    Time frame: pre, post

  3. The Tower of Hanoi (ToH) Task - Nomber of Moves

    A commonly used goal-directed measure assessing problem-solving, and specifically, planning. A computerized version of the task was used (http://vornlocher.de/tower).The participants completed the first two (out of six) levels of the task. the number of moves per level were recorded. less moves considered better.

    Time frame: pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months

  4. The Tower of Hanoi (ToH) Task- Complition Time

    A commonly used goal-directed measure assessing problem-solving, and specifically, planning. A computerized version of the task was used (http://vornlocher.de/tower).The participants completed the first two (out of six) levels of the task. the time for completion (seconds) were recorded. Shorter time for completetion considered better.

    Time frame: pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 1, 2024

Participant flow

Pre-Post Intervention
Participant flow — Pre-Post Intervention
MilestoneTECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard Care
Started3031
Completed2525
Not completed56
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject56
Post to Follow-up
Participant flow — Post to Follow-up
MilestoneTECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard Care
Started2525
Completed1714
Not completed811
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up811

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

A cognitive screening tool that assesses global cognition and includes the cognitive components: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuo-constructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Total score range from 0-30. A higher score indicates a better cognitive status. A score above 26 indicates normal cognition

Time frame:
pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
units on a scaleTECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard Care
Pre intervention22.6 ± 1.822.3 ± 1.9
Post 5 week intervention23.1 ± 2.721.9 ± 2.5
Follow-up after 6 months23.3 ± 3.221.5 ± 2.7
SecondaryWebNeuro

A computerized web-based battery assessment of neurocognitive functioning. The battery will include seven subtests that examine three cognitive domains: memory (Memory recognition/verbal list-learning task), executive planning (Switching of attention test, Verbal interference test, Maze test, Go-no-go test), and attention (Digit span test, Continuous performance test). A total thinking score will be calculated. Z score was calculated, providing a uniform comparison of the raw scores to a normative database, regardless of the original unit of measure used. The Z scores have a normative average of 0, with a standard deviation of 1, and no upper of lower limit. Positive values reflect better than average performance, and negative values reflect poorer than average performance.

Time frame:
pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months
Reported as:
Median · z-score
WebNeuro
z-scoreTECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard Care
Pre intervention-0.6 (-1.1 to -0.3)-0.9 (-1.2 to -0.5)
Post 5 weeks intervention-0.7 (-0.9 to -0.2)-0.9 (-1.2 to -0.4)
Follow up after 6 months-0.7 (-1.1 to -0.3)-0.7 (-1.2 to -0.4)
SecondaryGeneral Self-Efficacy Scale

Designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs to cope with a variety of difficult demands in life. It consists 10 statements such as 'I can solve most problems if I invest the necessary effort'. Possible responses are scored 1-4 (1 - not at all true to 4 - exactly true), the total score range from 10 to 40. Higher scores represent higher levels of general selfefficacy.

Time frame:
pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
General Self-Efficacy Scale
units on a scaleTECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard Care
Pre intervention35.0 (30.7 to 37.0)35.0 (30.0 to 37.0)
Post 5 weeks intervention34.5 (30.0 to 36.5)33.0 (28.0 to 37.0)
Follow up after 6 months35.0 (30.7 to 37.2)34.0 (29.0 to 37.0)
SecondaryThe 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)

SF-12 includes 12 questions from the SF-36 Health Survey. The SF-36 is a widely used and investigated, and validated instrument for measuring quality of life. The SF-12 was developed using normative data for the SF-36 in the United States. The shorter version designed to reproduce the Physical and the Mental Components Summary scores. A greater score indicates better health measures. The Physical Composite and Mental Composite will be calculated. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each subscale, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning

Time frame:
pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
units on a scaleTECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard Care
Physical Composite Pre intervention29.5 (24.9 to 29.5)29.5 (24.9 to 29.5)
Physical Composite Post 5 weeks intervention29.5 (23.8 to 29.5)29.5 (24.9 to 29.5)
Physical Composite Follow up after 6 months29.5 (24.9 to 29.5)29.5 (24.9 to 29.5)
Mental Composite Pre intervention46.2 (40.1 to 52.3)46.2 (46.2 to 52.3)
Mental Composite Post 5 weeks intervention52.3 (44.7 to 52.3)46.2 (46.2 to 52.3)
Mental Composite Follow up after 6 months52.3 (40.1 to 52.3)46.2 (46.2 to 46.2)
Other pre-specifiedThe Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)

Valid and reliable self-rating screening tool developed to detect depressive symptoms in elderly (D'ath, Katona, Mullan, Evans, \& Katona, 1994; Lesher \& Berryhill, 1994). The questionnaire includes 15 yes/no statements and takes up to10 minutes to complete. Total score ranges from 0-15. A higher score indicates a worse emotional state. Score above 10 points indicates the presence of depressive symptoms (Yesavage et al., 1983).

Time frame:
Pre intervention
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
units on a scaleTECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard Care
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)2.8 ± 1.82.7 ± 20.
Other pre-specifiedStructural and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Changes in brain volume, activity, and white-matter integrity will be assessed by MRI whole brain scanning. MRI scans will be performed on a 3T Prisma Siemens scanner at the Alfredo Federico Strauss Center for Computational Neuroimaging at Tel Aviv University. The MRI scans will include: two short structural assessments - magnetization prepared - rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) - diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI) (while participants perform the N-back test). 12 Participants allocated to the TECH intervention (experimental group) will be offered to undergo pre and post MRI scans.

Time frame:
pre, post

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedThe Tower of Hanoi (ToH) Task - Nomber of Moves

A commonly used goal-directed measure assessing problem-solving, and specifically, planning. A computerized version of the task was used (http://vornlocher.de/tower).The participants completed the first two (out of six) levels of the task. the number of moves per level were recorded. less moves considered better.

Time frame:
pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Nomber of moves
The Tower of Hanoi (ToH) Task - Nomber of Moves
Nomber of movesTECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard Care
level 1 moves pre10.3 ± 3.314.0 ± 9.6
level 1 moves post10.4 ± 3.611.1 ± 6.9
level 1 moves follow-up9.1 ± 2.512.5 ± 7.9
level 2 moves pre24.0 ± 9.224.1 ± 7.4
level 2 moves post24.4 ± 9.225.4 ± 7.8
level 2 moves follow up24.4 ± 13.023.4 ± 7.1
Other pre-specifiedThe Tower of Hanoi (ToH) Task- Complition Time

A commonly used goal-directed measure assessing problem-solving, and specifically, planning. A computerized version of the task was used (http://vornlocher.de/tower).The participants completed the first two (out of six) levels of the task. the time for completion (seconds) were recorded. Shorter time for completetion considered better.

Time frame:
pre intervention, post 5 weeks intervention, follow-up after 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Seconds
The Tower of Hanoi (ToH) Task- Complition Time
SecondsTECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard Care
level 1 completion time pre84.9 ± 51.298.0 ± 66.8
level 1 completion time post60.0 ± 31.170.2 ± 57.3
level 1 completion time follow up60.0 ± 44.989.7 ± 67.9
level 2 completion time pre147.5 ± 59.5138.3 ± 55.9
level 2 completion time post148.9 ± 78.5132.7 ± 70.1
level 2 completion time follow up143.9 ± 73.2123.0 ± 63.3

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
TECH Protocol0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Standard Care or Active Standard Care0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

According to the inclusion criteria, all participants had MCI, were independent in BADL and IADL without severe depressive symptoms. Most participants reported to use a smartphone or/and a computer on a daily basis prior to the study, a few reported previous touchscreen tablet experience.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard CareTotal
Mean75.6 ± 5.875.1 ± 6.075.3 ± 5.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard CareTotal
Female141428
Male161733
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)TECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard CareTotal
Jewish303161
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)TECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard CareTotal
Israel303161
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)(units on a scale)TECH ProtocolStandard Care or Active Standard CareTotal
Mean22.6 ± 1.822.3 ± 1.922.5 ± 1.8
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Maccabi Healthcare Services
    Tel Aviv, Israel
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 1, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02955277
Lead sponsor
Assuta Hospital Systems
Responsible party
Zvi Buckman (Dr. Zvi Buckman, Assuta Hospital Systems) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2016
Start date
Jan 4, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 20, 2020
Completion
Mar 20, 2020
Results posted
Mar 1, 2024
Last update
Mar 1, 2024

Study contacts

Zvi Buckman, MD
principal investigator · Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion