An interventional study of 3 bicortical screws and adjustable plate and 2 bicortical screws in Mandibular Hypoplasia, sponsored by Joseph Van Sickels. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-05.
Sponsored by Joseph Van Sickels · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
In this current study a comparison between 3 positional screws versus the adjustable plating system in conjunction with 2 positional screws. The patients will be selected to have retrognathic mandible requiring advancement. Hypothetically the advantage of the adjustable plating system will be compared with the three positional screws. In theory, the investigators will be using the inherent advantage of the intraoperative flexibility of the adjustable plating system in verifying the position of the proximal segment (condylar segment), hence eliminating the immediate postoperative relapse that is reported with using three positional screws. This will be evaluated both clinically and cephalometrically.
Trauner and Obwegeser in 1957, reported the first correction of jaw deformity by the sagittal split technique.
Dal Pont in 1961, a student of Obwegeser, made a modification to the latter technique, to further enhance the precision and the accuracy of movement of both proximal distal segments his technique has become widely publicized. He changed the lower horizontal cut to a vertical cut on the buccal cortex between the first and second molars, there by obtaining broader bony contact.
Hunsuck in 1968, modified the technique, to decrease the soft tissue dissection; he advocated a shorter horizontal medial cut.
Epker in 1977, modified the technique in several ways to decrease swelling, manipulation to the neurovascular bundle and hemorrhage, his modification included minimal stripping of the masseter muscle and medial dissection.
BSSRO is now the most common procedure used to advance the mandible is a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
There are many different methods of mandibular fixation such as using intra osseous wiring combined with inter maxillary fixation (IMF) which showed significant amount of relapse and patient dissatisfaction, this is called nonrigid fixation. Another type of mandibular fixation is the three point fixation using positioning screws called rigid fixation. Rigid internal fixation was introduced in 1976 by Spiessel to promote healing, restore early function, and decrease relapse. The introduction of an internal rigid fixation method, instead of 5-6 week intermaxillary fixation, had the added benefit of shorter periods of hospital stay and patient convenience.' Minimal or no immobilization of the jaws allows patients to function sooner, resume their daily activities, and return to work earlier. In a relatively short period of time, the use of rigid fixation of bony segments in orthognathic surgery had become a standard of care.
A major concern in the surgical correction of a anteroposterior mandibular deficient patients is potential postsurgical relapse.
Clinical studies have shown a wide array of successful techniques used to fix segments. Three bicortical screws placed in an inverted-L fashion has become the gold standard for stabilizing a bilateral sagittal split advancement. Various problems emerged, however, showing that the stability necessary for the stabilization of an osteotomy site cannot be directly compared with that of a fracture. Other problems encountered were difficulties in positioning the fragments in new sites, which resulted in malposition of the condyle. This led to the term 'immediate postoperative relapse'. In addition, pain and dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) complicated the treatment and made the target of long-term stability difficult to achieve.
In this current study a comparison between 3 positional screws in comparison with the adjustable plate in conjunction with 2 positional screws will be used in a group of patients suffering from retrognathia and will be treated by BSSRO, thus the investigators are using the advantage of the inherent adjustability of the plate intraoperatively with the good fixation and the stability inherent in the bicortical screws short term stability. This will be evaluated both clinically and cephalometrically.
26 studies on the registry are indexed under Micrognathism; 7 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 24 across 22 interventional studies indexed under Micrognathism.
Browse Micrognathism studies →This is the only study on the registry with Joseph Van Sickels as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
1st group:3 bicortical screws will be used to fix the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Device: 3 bicortical screws
adjustable plate and 2 bicortical screws will be used to fix the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Device: adjustable plate and 2 bicortical screws
after mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy surgery is performed in the first group the osteotomy will be fixed using 3 bicortical screws
after mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy surgery is performed in the second group the osteotomy will be fixed using adjustable plate and 2 bicortical screws
cephalometric analysis to measure angles(degrees)
Time frame: (an xray preoperative, immediate postoperative, 6 weeks and 6 months)
cephalometric analysis to measure lines(mm)
Time frame: (an xray preoperative, immediate postoperative, 6 weeks and 6 months)
operation time in minutes
Time frame: intraoperative timing during surgery
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
Ran from Oct 2015 to primary completion in Mar 2017, 17 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.