CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02948504Updated Nov 15, 2016

Chinese Small Intracranial Aneurysm Study (CSIAS)

An observational study in Intracranial Aneurysm, Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm and Treatment Side Effects, sponsored by RenJi Hospital. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-15.

Sponsored by RenJi Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2016), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intracranial aneurysms are common in the general population. The overall prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is estimated of 2.3-3.2% in the population without specific risk factors for SAH. As noninvasive imaging modalities are more commonly used than before, UIAs are increasingly being detected. Most patients with small aneurysms (less than 5mm) are incidentally found in clinical practice. Some studies indicate that the majority of patients with UIAs, particularly with small aneurysms (\<7mm), have a low risk of rupture, and others have found that small ruptured aneurysms have a high proportion in patients with SAH. Therefore, there is a lot of controversy regarding which small aneurysms can be left untreated, or which aneurysms are needed to be treated with clipping or coiling.

The prevalence varies widely among different detection methods, race/ethnicity or patients with other inherited diseases. Although a wealth of data is available for the natural history of UIAs, the true natural history remains unknown because case selection bias occur in almost all studies. However, data on Chinese UIA is unknown. Using the MR angiography (MRA) to detect aneurysms, the prevalence is 7% of selected adult population in China. Therefore, small UIAs are very common and are increasingly being detected in clinical practice. Conservative treatment, surgical clipping and endovascular coiling are the three treatment options for UIAs. The optimal treatment remains controversial, particularly for small aneurysms (less than 7mm). To date, no clinical trials have compared the safety and efficacy between conservative treatment and surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for UIAs. It may be impossible to conduct the randomized controlled study considering aneurysm ruptured as a devastating event. However, surgical clipping or endovascular treatment itself carries a risk of immediate morbidity or mortality. Therefore, a substantial variability widely exists in treatment decision-making for UIAs, and this may lead to a great variability in clinical recommendations.

Our study is a prospective observational study to identify the incidence of rupture of small aneurysms in the first year after the diagnosis of the aneurysm which is left untreated. Meanwhile, we determine the differences of outcomes, procedural complications, and rates of retreatment between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for small UIAs in China.

Read the detailed description
  1. Background: There is a lot of controversy regarding which aneurysms can be left untreated, or which aneurysms are needed to be treated with clipping or coiling. To date, no clinical trials have compared the safety and efficacy between conservative treatment and surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for small UIAs.
  2. Study design: A multicenter prospective observation registry study. This study is undertaken to conform to the study protocol. Patients will be recruited between December 2016 and December 2018. Patients are eligible for the study if they meet the inclusion criteria and they are not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are met.
  3. Procedures: All patients were interviewed by a multidisciplinary team that consisted of vascular neurosurgeons, interventional neuroradiologists and anesthetists. If patients meet all of the inclusion criteria: an unruptured aneurysms ≤5mm are enrolled and then followed up at 6 and12 months. Clinical observation, surgical clipping and endovascular coiling are the three treatment options for UIAs. In general, when an UIA is detected, it should be needed to quit smoking, to aggressively manage hypertension, and to control alcohol use. When an aggressive treatment is considered, treatment risks should be balanced against the risk of rupture.
02

Conditions studied

  • Intracranial Aneurysm
  • Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm
  • Treatment Side Effects

Keywords

  • Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm
  • Small aneurysms
  • Risk of rupture
  • Natural history
  • Endovascular Coiling
  • Surgical clipping
03

In context

Intracranial Aneurysm

427 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Aneurysm; 115 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 200 across 198 observational studies indexed under Intracranial Aneurysm.

Browse Intracranial Aneurysm studies →

Lead sponsor

RenJi Hospital is the lead sponsor of 535 studies on the registry; 244 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Five hundred patients with unruptured aneurysms will registered in this study during the 3 years.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Intracranial unruptured aneurysms confirmed by digital subtraction angiography DSA, CT angiography or MR angiography (MRA);
  2. The maximum size of unruptured aneurysm ≤5mm;
  3. Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1.Patients with severe systemic disorders and expected life span less than one year; 2.Pregnant or lactating women.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Observation

    Aneurysms are left untreated based on patients and family's wishes. These patients will be included in the observation group.

  • Coiling or Clipping

    Patients are included in the coiling group if they undergo endovascular coiling, such as single coiling, stent-assisted coiling and balloon-assisted coiling. Or Patients are included in the clipping group if they undergo surgical coiling, such as aneurysm neck clipping, aneurysm isolation or trapping.

    Procedure: Coiling or Clipping

Interventions

  • ProcedureCoiling or Clipping

    All patients are treated under general anesthesia and systemic heparinization. A bolus of 50-75 IU/kg of heparin is given after femoral sheath placement, and intermittent boluses of 1250 IU per hour are given during the procedure. Activated clotting time is maintained at 2-3 times baseline level. Balloon-assisted coiling or stent-assisted coiling are considered in aneurysms with an unfavorable morphology (aneurysm neck≥ 4.0 mm or dome/neck ≤2.0). All anterior circulation aneurysms are clipped through a standard pterional or frontal temporal approach. The posterior circulation aneurysms are treated using far lateral approach depending on the aneurysm location.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rupture of an unruptured aneurysm

    These aneurysms are left untreated.

    Time frame: One year of follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Regrowth of an unruptured aneurysm

    Time frame: 9 and 12 months of imaging follow-up

  2. Recurrence and retreatment after coiling or clipping

    Time frame: one year of follow-up

  3. Poor outcome after coiling or clipping

    Poor outcome is defined as a mRS 3-6

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Procedural complications

    Time frame: 30 days after coiling or clipping

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sonobe M, Yamazaki T, Yonekura M, Kikuchi H. Small unruptured intracranial aneurysm verification study: SUAVe study, Japan. Stroke. 2010 Sep;41(9):1969-77. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585059. Epub 2010 Jul 29. PubMed 20671254 ↗
  • Rahman M, Smietana J, Hauck E, Hoh B, Hopkins N, Siddiqui A, Levy EI, Meng H, Mocco J. Size ratio correlates with intracranial aneurysm rupture status: a prospective study. Stroke. 2010 May;41(5):916-20. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574244. Epub 2010 Apr 8. PubMed 20378866 ↗
  • Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD Jr, Morita A, Juvela S, Yonekura M, Ishibashi T, Torner JC, Nakayama T, Rinkel GJ, Algra A. Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jan;13(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1. Epub 2013 Nov 27. PubMed 24290159 ↗
  • Brown RD Jr, Broderick JP. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: epidemiology, natural history, management options, and familial screening. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Apr;13(4):393-404. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70015-8. PubMed 24646873 ↗
  • Juvela S, Poussa K, Lehto H, Porras M. Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a long-term follow-up study. Stroke. 2013 Sep;44(9):2414-21. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001838. Epub 2013 Jul 18. PubMed 23868274 ↗
  • Guresir E, Vatter H, Schuss P, Platz J, Konczalla J, de Rochement Rdu M, Berkefeld J, Seifert V. Natural history of small unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: a prospective cohort study. Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3027-31. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001107. Epub 2013 Sep 3. PubMed 24003049 ↗
  • UCAS Japan Investigators; Morita A, Kirino T, Hashi K, Aoki N, Fukuhara S, Hashimoto N, Nakayama T, Sakai M, Teramoto A, Tominari S, Yoshimoto T. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2474-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113260. PubMed 22738097 ↗
  • Tominari S, Morita A, Ishibashi T, Yamazaki T, Takao H, Murayama Y, Sonobe M, Yonekura M, Saito N, Shiokawa Y, Date I, Tominaga T, Nozaki K, Houkin K, Miyamoto S, Kirino T, Hashi K, Nakayama T; Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Study Japan Investigators. Prediction model for 3-year rupture risk of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in Japanese patients. Ann Neurol. 2015 Jun;77(6):1050-9. doi: 10.1002/ana.24400. Epub 2015 Apr 22. PubMed 25753954 ↗
  • Murayama Y, Takao H, Ishibashi T, Saguchi T, Ebara M, Yuki I, Arakawa H, Irie K, Urashima M, Molyneux AJ. Risk Analysis of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Prospective 10-Year Cohort Study. Stroke. 2016 Feb;47(2):365-71. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010698. Epub 2016 Jan 7. PubMed 26742803 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 15, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02948504
Lead sponsor
RenJi Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 28, 2016
Start date
Dec 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 15, 2016

Study contacts

Bing Zhao
Contact
drzhaobing@yahoo.com
08613601696475
Jieqing Wan, MD,PHD
principal investigator · Department of Neurosurgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion