CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02947516Updated Apr 19, 2022

Comparison of EUS-Guided Liver Biopsy With Percutaneous Liver Biopsy

An interventional study of Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy and Percutaneous liver biopsy in Fibrosis, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-19.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was withdrawn
Funding n/a
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There are several ways to perform liver biopsies, including the percutaneous route (historical gold standard) and via endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. The primary aim of this study is to prospectively compare patients undergoing EUS-guided liver biopsies to patients undergoing percutaneous biopsy. The investigators hypothesize that (1) patients who are randomized to undergo EUS-guided liver biopsy will rate themselves as having less pain in the 48 hours following the procedure, and (2) will have comparable histologic yield to a 2:1 matched cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsies.

Read the detailed description

Currently, liver biopsy is the gold standard for determining the index of liver fibrosis in a patient with chronic liver disease, and whether the patient has progressed to cirrhosis. These biopsies are predominantly performed percutaneously. However, there are several complications related to liver biopsy, the most common of which are pain and bleeding.

There has been significant movement over the past several years to assess the utility of alternative techniques and approaches for the evaluation of liver disease. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a well-established technique for diagnostic and therapeutic evaluation of gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary disorders. EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has shown to be technically simple, safe, and provides adequate diagnostic yield for evaluation of liver disease in both children and adults. There are several advantages to EUS-LB. First, it would theoretically be less painful than the percutaneous approach, as it does not require skin puncture and also offers the comfort of sedation and analgesia. It also eliminates the need for breath hold. Furthermore, it is an image-guided approach which allows visualization and avoidance of blood vessels even 1 mm in size. Additionally, it provides an access area to a much wider segment of liver parenchyma as the entire left lobe, and the majority of the right lobe can be evaluated for possible needle puncture sites from the stomach and duodenal bulb, respectively. In addition to obtaining tissue, EUS-LB also offers the benefit of evaluating the biliary tree, gallbladder, pancreas, lymph nodes, and vascular anatomy for a more comprehensive evaluation in the same setting. Finally, in patients ultimately found to have biopsy-proven cirrhosis, it simultaneously provides the necessary variceal screening which would otherwise require an additional procedure.

The aim of this study is to prospectively perform EUS-guided liver biopsies in patients who are otherwise candidates for percutaneous biopsy. We hypothesize that (1) patients who are randomized to undergo EUS-guided liver biopsy will rate themselves as having less pain in the 48 hours following the procedure and (2) will have comparable histologic yield to a 2:1 matched cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous transjugular liver biopsies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fibrosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
  • liver
  • biopsy
  • pain
03

In context

Fibrosis

3,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibrosis; 465 are open to participants now.

Browse Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,236 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (55%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years and older
  • Eligibility for receiving conscious sedation or monitored anesthesia care
  • Abnormal liver function tests with comprehensive previous evaluation (including serologic testing and cross-sectional imaging) leading to an appropriate decision to proceed with liver biopsy and/or portal pressure measurements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected or known malignant liver disease
  • Severe thrombocytopenia (platelets \<50,000/microL)
  • Severe coagulopathy (international normalized ratio [INR] > 1.7 or other known coagulopathy)
  • Use of antiplatelet agents within 7 days of the procedure
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Percutaneous liver biopsy

    Participants will be referred for liver biopsy by their hepatologist/gastroenterologist. The intervention is that these participants will undergo a percutaneous liver biopsy per standard protocol.

    Procedure: Percutaneous liver biopsy

  • Experimental
    EUS-guided liver biopsy

    Participants will be referred for liver biopsy by their hepatologist/gastroenterologist. The intervention is that these participants will undergo an endoscopic ultrasound procedure per standard protocol. The liver will be identified, and Color Doppler imaging prior to needle puncture will confirm lack of significant vascular structures within the needle path. Liver biopsies using up to 1-2 passes from the left hepatic lobe using a transgastric approach and up to 1-2 passes from the right hepatic lobe using a transduodenal bulb approach will be performed. The participant will be observed in the recovery unit for up to 60 minutes after the EUS-LB, and discharged if no pain or signs of complication.

    Procedure: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy

    Participants will undergo endoscopic ultrasound per standard technique, with liver biopsy performed at that time.

  • ProcedurePercutaneous liver biopsy

    Participants will undergo percutaneous liver biopsy per standard protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Universal Pain Assessment Tool (UPAT)

    Time frame: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Medication Requirements

    Use of any analgesics/narcotics

    Time frame: 48 hours

  2. Histologic Yield

    Number of portal triads on histology

    Time frame: 1 week

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003 Dec;38(6):1449-57. doi: 10.1016/j.hep.2003.09.022. PubMed 14647056 ↗
  • Eisenberg E, Konopniki M, Veitsman E, Kramskay R, Gaitini D, Baruch Y. Prevalence and characteristics of pain induced by percutaneous liver biopsy. Anesth Analg. 2003 May;96(5):1392-1396. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000060453.74744.17. PubMed 12707140 ↗
  • Caldwell SH. Controlling pain in liver biopsy, or "we will probably need to repeat the biopsy in a year or two to assess the response". Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 May;96(5):1327-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03847.x. No abstract available. PubMed 11374664 ↗
  • Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Giusti G. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol. 1986;2(2):165-73. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(86)80075-7. PubMed 3958472 ↗
  • Huang JF, Hsieh MY, Dai CY, Hou NJ, Lee LP, Lin ZY, Chen SC, Wang LY, Hsieh MY, Chang WY, Yu ML, Chuang WL. The incidence and risks of liver biopsy in non-cirrhotic patients: An evaluation of 3806 biopsies. Gut. 2007 May;56(5):736-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.115410. No abstract available. PubMed 17440193 ↗
  • Perrault J, McGill DB, Ott BJ, Taylor WF. Liver biopsy: complications in 1000 inpatients and outpatients. Gastroenterology. 1978 Jan;74(1):103-6. PubMed 618417 ↗
  • Firpi RJ, Soldevila-Pico C, Abdelmalek MF, Morelli G, Judah J, Nelson DR. Short recovery time after percutaneous liver biopsy: should we change our current practices? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Sep;3(9):926-9. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00294-6. PubMed 16234032 ↗
  • Stone MA, Mayberry JF. An audit of ultrasound guided liver biopsies: a need for evidence-based practice. Hepatogastroenterology. 1996 Mar-Apr;43(8):432-4. PubMed 8714240 ↗
  • Hollerbach S, Willert J, Topalidis T, Reiser M, Schmiegel W. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of liver lesions: histological and cytological assessment. Endoscopy. 2003 Sep;35(9):743-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41593. PubMed 12929021 ↗
  • Fuccio L, Larghi A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: How to obtain a core biopsy? Endosc Ultrasound. 2014 Apr;3(2):71-81. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.123011. PubMed 24955336 ↗
  • Stavropoulos SN, Im GY, Jlayer Z, Harris MD, Pitea TC, Turi GK, Malet PF, Friedel DM, Grendell JH. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.043. PubMed 22248599 ↗
  • Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Petrone MC, Abdulkader I, Monges G, Costamagna G, Arcidiacono P, Biermann K, Rindi G, Bories E, Dogloni C, Bruno M, Dominguez-Munoz JE. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.053. Epub 2011 Mar 21. PubMed 21420083 ↗
  • Johal AS, Khara HS, Maksimak MG, Diehl DL. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in pediatric patients. Endosc Ultrasound. 2014 Jul;3(3):191-4. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.138794. PubMed 25184126 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 19, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02947516
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Responsible party
Marvin Ryou (Principal Investigator, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 28, 2016
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Jun 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 19, 2022

Study contacts

Marvin Ryou, MD
principal investigator · Brigham and Women's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion