CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02936076Updated Mar 29, 2021Results posted

Exercise as a Buffer Against Stress-induced Overeating

An interventional study of Exercise intervention and Delayed exercise intervention in Obesity, sponsored by The Miriam Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-29.

Sponsored by The Miriam Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the psychological benefits of chronic exercise as well as the effects of exercise training on eating behaviors and stress-induced overeating in overweight and obese women. Participants will be randomized to an 12-week exercise condition or a delayed exercise condition. Assessments will occur at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks and will include answering surveys in real-time using smartphones, several assessments of eating behaviors and dietary intake, and questionnaire measures of factors which could mediate the relationship between exercise and eating. Participants will be compensated for completing assessments and for adherence to the exercise protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hyperphagia

94 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperphagia; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49 is close to the median of 50 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Hyperphagia.

Browse Hyperphagia studies →

Lead sponsor

The Miriam Hospital is the lead sponsor of 178 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Female
  • 18-60 years of age
  • BMI 25 to \<40 kg/m2
  • Physically inactive (\<60 min/week of physical activity)
  • Must own a smartphone
  • Must be willing to receive and respond to text message prompts for 14 days at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Shift workers
  • Individuals who do not endorse stress-eating
  • Recent weight loss or current enrollment in a weight loss program
  • Women who are pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant in the next 6 months
  • Any medical condition that would limit participation in physical activity
  • Diabetes
  • Inability to walk without an assisted device
  • Inability to meet exercise recommendations
  • Failure to adequately complete all baseline assessment measures
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Exercise condition

    Participants randomized to the exercise condition will participate in a 12-week exercise training program. The exercise intervention will consist of both supervised and unsupervised exercise sessions and progress to 200 minutes/week of moderate-intensity exercise. Exercise bouts will be spread across 4-6 days and be at least 20 minutes in duration. During supervised visits, heart rate will be monitored by a member of the research staff to ensure that exercise is within the prescribed intensity range and ratings of perceived exertion and feeling state will be assessed periodically. Unsupervised exercise will be verified using objective physical activity monitors.

    Other: Exercise intervention

  • Placebo comparator
    Delayed exercise condition

    Participants randomized to the delayed exercise condition will be asked not to change their exercise or eating habits over the 12-week period and will complete the same assessment measures as the exercise condition. However, following the completion of the 12-week period, participants will be given two options: 1) receive a one-on-one session with an exercise physiologist at our center and receive a written exercise program, and at this time point all study obligations will be completed, or 2) complete the identical exercise protocol as the 'exercise' condition.

    Other: Delayed exercise intervention

Interventions

  • OtherExercise intervention
  • OtherDelayed exercise intervention
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stress-induced Overeating Measured Via Smartphone Surveys

    Participants completed EMA surveys (5x/day for 14 days). At each prompt they were asked if an eating episode occurred. If they indicated 'yes', they were asked to check all that apply: a) I ate past the point of feeling full, b) I ate more than usual, c) I had unplanned eating (i.e., consumed food when I don't usually eat and was not making up for a missed meal, or d) None of the above. If the participant responded with a, b, or c, it was classified as an 'overeating episode'. Further, at each prompt, participants were asked to the respond to the following: 'Right now I feel stressed' (1=not at all, 7=very much so). If the stress score was \>=5 at the prompt just prior to an overeating episode, then it was considered a 'stress-induced overeating episode'.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Percentage of Overeating Episodes Characterized as 'Overeating'

    If an eating episode occurred, participants were asked to check all that apply: a) I ate past the point of feeling full, b) I ate more than usual, c) I had unplanned eating (i.e., consumed food when I don't usually eat and was not making up for a missed meal, or d) None of the above. If response was a, b, or c, it was classified as an 'overeating episode'.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Weight (% Initial Weight)

    Percent weight change from baseline to 12 weeks

    Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

  2. Stress as Measured Via Questionnaire

    The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen 1988) was used to assess changes in stress by treatment arm from baseline to 12 weeks. Scores on this measure range from 0-40 with a higher score indicating greater perceived stress. Presented values are 12 week scores adjusted for baseline values.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Oct 23, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExercise ConditionDelayed Exercise Condition
Started2524
Completed1920
Not completed64

Outcome measures

PrimaryStress-induced Overeating Measured Via Smartphone Surveys

Participants completed EMA surveys (5x/day for 14 days). At each prompt they were asked if an eating episode occurred. If they indicated 'yes', they were asked to check all that apply: a) I ate past the point of feeling full, b) I ate more than usual, c) I had unplanned eating (i.e., consumed food when I don't usually eat and was not making up for a missed meal, or d) None of the above. If the participant responded with a, b, or c, it was classified as an 'overeating episode'. Further, at each prompt, participants were asked to the respond to the following: 'Right now I feel stressed' (1=not at all, 7=very much so). If the stress score was \>=5 at the prompt just prior to an overeating episode, then it was considered a 'stress-induced overeating episode'.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · episodes
Stress-induced Overeating Measured Via Smartphone Surveys
episodesExercise ConditionDelayed Exercise Condition
Stress-induced Overeating Measured Via Smartphone Surveys0.74 ± 1.560.55 ± 1.0
PrimaryPercentage of Overeating Episodes Characterized as 'Overeating'

If an eating episode occurred, participants were asked to check all that apply: a) I ate past the point of feeling full, b) I ate more than usual, c) I had unplanned eating (i.e., consumed food when I don't usually eat and was not making up for a missed meal, or d) None of the above. If response was a, b, or c, it was classified as an 'overeating episode'.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · % of eating episodes
Percentage of Overeating Episodes Characterized as 'Overeating'
% of eating episodesExercise ConditionDelayed Exercise Condition
Percentage of Overeating Episodes Characterized as 'Overeating'21.98 ± 3.3226.62 ± 3.58
SecondaryChange in Body Weight (% Initial Weight)

Percent weight change from baseline to 12 weeks

Time frame:
baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Change in Body Weight (% Initial Weight)
percent changeExercise ConditionDelayed Exercise Condition
Change in Body Weight (% Initial Weight)-1.1 ± 3.50.4 ± 2.0
SecondaryStress as Measured Via Questionnaire

The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen 1988) was used to assess changes in stress by treatment arm from baseline to 12 weeks. Scores on this measure range from 0-40 with a higher score indicating greater perceived stress. Presented values are 12 week scores adjusted for baseline values.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Stress as Measured Via Questionnaire
units on a scaleExercise ConditionDelayed Exercise Condition
Stress as Measured Via Questionnaire22.7 ± 0.821.5 ± 0.8

Adverse events

Collected over 12 weeks post randomization. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Exercise Condition0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Delayed Exercise Condition0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Exercise ConditionDelayed Exercise ConditionTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years252449
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Exercise ConditionDelayed Exercise ConditionTotal
Mean39.9 ± 11.741.0 ± 10.040.4 ± 10.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Exercise ConditionDelayed Exercise ConditionTotal
Female252449
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Exercise ConditionDelayed Exercise ConditionTotal
Hispanic or Latino325
Not Hispanic or Latino222244
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Exercise ConditionDelayed Exercise ConditionTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American044
White211637
More than one race011
Unknown or Not Reported336
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Exercise ConditionDelayed Exercise ConditionTotal
United States252449
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center
    Providence, Rhode Island 002903, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Unick JL, Dunsiger SI, Leblond T, Hahn K, Thomas JG, Abrantes AM, Stroud LR, Wing RR. Randomized Trial Examining the Effect of a 12-wk Exercise Program on Hedonic Eating. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Aug 1;53(8):1638-1647. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002619. PubMed 34261994 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 11, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 11, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 29, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02936076
Lead sponsor
The Miriam Hospital
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 18, 2016
Start date
Jan 16, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2018
Completion
May 21, 2019
Results posted
Oct 23, 2019
Last update
Mar 29, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion