CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02928276PAnTheRAUpdated Feb 7, 2019

Predictive Analytics for Theranosis in RA

An interventional study of RheumaKit: Prediction of the response to anti-TNFs DMARDs in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by DNAlytics. Status unknown at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-07.

Sponsored by DNAlytics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RA is the most common inflammatory, persistent and progressive disease of the joints with serious co-morbidities and huge health and socio-economic impact worldwide.

Read the detailed description

The current standard therapeutic strategy for RA patients is to initiate a DMARDs therapy, (e.g. MTX) with serious side effects. This also applies to some PSO or SNSA patients. MTX is however inefficient in about 40% of the cases. Other treatments (biological DMARDs) must thus be initiated, which have an overall similar effectiveness and side effects and an higher cost (around 13kEUR/year/patient). Therapeutic choices are based on symptoms and blood tests including markers of inflammation which are inadequate to predict disease evolution and response to treatments. Improving RA management requires to improve the adequacy of the therapeutic strategies. The earlier the disease is correctly addressed, the more likely its progression and irreversible damages to the joints will be limited. DNAlytics recently developed RheumaKit a differential diagnostic solution for UA patients. UA is a condition in which joint inflammation is present, but a precise diagnosis cannot be made, due to the lack of sensitivity of presently available diagnostic techniques. RheumaKit is a multi-gene expression solution that discriminates RA from other joint conditions. A diagnostic model train to identify patients suffering from RA, SNSA or OA. RheumaKit diagnostic accuracy is higher than 90%, a performance that is better than any other diagnostic solution designed until now, including the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for the diagnosis of RA. See working principle below. Beyond diagnosis, DNAlytics wants to make RheumaKit evolve towards treatment recommendation applications (theranostic applications) for patients eligible for biological DMARDs. On one hand, the diseases of these patients have been more and more described in terms of the activity of several metabolic pathways (T \& B cells activation, Extra cellular matrix, Inteferon, TNF). On the other hand, the existing treatments also have been more and more described in terms of the pathways they target. The RheumaKit signature contains many markers that are representative of these pathways of interest. RheumaKit thus now provides a snapshot of the activity of seven metabolic pathways known from literature to be related to diseases mechanisms, or to be target of existing treatments. In this study, DNAlytics wants to show that based on a score defined on the RheumaKit platform, the response or non- response to anti-TNFs, representing the largest category of biological DMARDs, can be predicted before treatment initiation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • Rheumakit
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • anti-TNF
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 110 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

DNAlytics is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients must satisfy all of the following criteria:

  • Signed the ICF and covered by health insurance.
  • At least 18 years old.
  • For women, use of a reliable method of birth control or remain abstinent during the study, or have had surgical sterilization or women above 60 years of age.
  • Having undergone at least 3 months of synthetic DMARD treatment while being strictly eligible for it (diagnosed with RA) and being at a stable dose at least for the last month, and showing no satisfactory response to this therapy.
  • Be eligible for biological DMARD treatment according to local regulation and practice.
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, tests and other protocol procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients must satisfy none of the following criteria:

  • Arthritis history longer than 5 years.
  • Biological DMARD therapy already initiated.
  • Be diagnosed with septic arthritis.
  • Be pregnant or breastfeeding/lactating women.
  • Diagnosed with HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, Crohn's disease, fibromyalgia.
  • Diagnosed with other inflammatory arthritic syndrome than RA.
  • have a chronic pain condition that would confound evaluation of the patient.
  • Be identified as at too high risk for biopsy or for biologic therapy.
  • Be identified as having psychological, familial, social or geographical conditions which could potentially hamper compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    All patients

    All eligible patients

    Other: RheumaKit: Prediction of the response to anti-TNFs DMARDs

Interventions

  • OtherRheumaKit: Prediction of the response to anti-TNFs DMARDs
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ability of a score

    To show the ability of a score, computed prior to treatment initiation, to be predictive of the individual anti-TNF response. The score is based on the RheumaKit transcriptomic profiles from a set of small synovial biopsies from a given joint also harvested before anti-TNF treatment initiation.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Identify additional/alternative mappings

    To identify additional/alternative mappings between components of gene expression profiles obtained via the RheumaKit assay (extended, and possibly combined to clinical and biological information) and efficacy of anti-TNFs biological DMARDs.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  2. Validate the sample logistics at an international scale.

    To validate the feasibility of the implementation of a molecular biology test in rheumatology based on synovial tissue at an international scale. This covers both logistics and patient agreeableness aspects.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Clinique Universitaires Saint-Luc
    Brussels, Bruxelles-capital 1200, Belgium
    • Aurore Maboge, MSc · Contact · aurore.maboge@uclouvain.be · +32 2 764 79 80
    • Patrick Durez, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Bernard Lauwerys, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • CHU Saint-Pierre
    Bruxelles, 1000, Belgium
    • Katty Renard, MSc · Contact · katty_renard@stpierre-bru.be · + 32.2.535.48.56
    • Laurent Méric de Bellfon, MD · Principal investigator
    • Silvana Di Romana, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • UZLeuven, Gasthuisberg
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
    • Johan Joly · Contact · johan.joly@uzleuven.be
    • Rene Westhovens, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Patrick Verschueren, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • CHU Liège
    Liège, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari
    Sabadell, Catalunia 08208, Spain
    • Lorena Blanco · Contact · lblanco@tauli.cat
    • Eduard Graell, MD · Principal investigator
    • Antonio D Gomez, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lauwerys BR, Hernandez-Lobato D, Gramme P, Ducreux J, Dessy A, Focant I, Ambroise J, Bearzatto B, Nzeusseu Toukap A, Van den Eynde BJ, Elewaut D, Gala JL, Durez P, Houssiau FA, Helleputte T, Dupont P. Heterogeneity of synovial molecular patterns in patients with arthritis. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0122104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122104. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25927832 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 7, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02928276
Lead sponsor
DNAlytics
Collaborators
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 10, 2016
Start date
Nov 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 7, 2019

Study contacts

Helleputte Thibault, PhD
Contact
thibault.helleputte@dnalytics.com
+32 10 39 00 96
Patrick Durez, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Clinique Universitaire Saint-Luc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion