CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02925065PD/GuitarUpdated Oct 2, 2018

Impact of Non-traditional Guitar Group Instruction on Functional Movement and Well-being in Parkinson's Disease Patients

An interventional study of Non-traditional group guitar instruction in Parkinson's Disease, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-02.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This controlled prospective cohort study is designed to assess the feasibility and effect of twice-weekly 60 minute non-traditional guitar classes on PD patient's self-reported and measurable outcomes including upper extremity function, motor findings, quality of life, mood, and cognitive findings. 24-30 individuals with PD will be randomly assigned to an early-start and a late-start guitar instruction group. Prior to conducting a larger study, this study seeks to assess the possibility that participation in an instrumental performance activity in a group setting may improve outcomes in PD patients.

Read the detailed description

PROBLEM STATEMENT: Engagement in musical activities has been found to improve symptoms in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), and physical therapy and music therapy have been demonstrated as viable non-pharmacological intervention methods that improve motor function in these individuals. Therapeutic instrumental music performance has the attributes of physical, rhythmic and social engagement combined with immediate auditory feedback, and has the potential to bring in additional neuro-rehabilitative effects associated with musical engagement into a treatment design. However, until now, much of the research has focused on the rhythmic aspects of music. Few studies have examined how active and complex engagement with music, such as learning to play an instrument, may help PD patients. Finger-style guitar instruction has the potential to improve bilateral dexterity in addition to other gains reported with music-based interventions in patients with PD.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot controlled prospective cohort study is to assess the feasibility and the effects of non-traditional finger-style guitar classes on the quality of life, motor symptoms, upper extremity function, cognition, mood and social participation in individuals with PD.

HYPOTHESIS: The investigators hypothesize that a 6-week bi-weekly finger-style guitar group intervention (12 sessions in total) in addition to usual and routine treatment will be a feasible intervention in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD), and both immediate and delayed start groups, of PD patients who participate in a twice-weekly non-traditional guitar class training for 6 weeks will have unchanged or improved upper extremity function and dexterity, improved quality of life and mood.

IMPORTANCE: The estimated overall prevalence of PD in the world is 315 per 100,000 individuals overall, and about 2 per 100 individuals 60 years of age or older, with higher estimates for older individuals living in North America, Europe and Australia. PD prevalence in the United States is projected to rise by 77% between 2010 and 2030. Music and rhythm-based interventions are noninvasive, patient-oriented techniques that lack side effects. The guitar is the most popular played instrument in the U.S, and it is the principal instrument of choice for music therapists. It is affordable and portable, with easy access to commercial instruction. Non-traditional engagement in finger-style music making on the guitar may have a broad impact on PD by improving the quality of functional upper extremity movements, decreasing the amplitude of involuntary movements, increasing social and cognitive participation in activities of daily living, and improving quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson's Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Parkinson's
  • Non-traditional guitar instruction
  • Guitar therapy
  • Upper extremity motor function
  • Hand dexterity
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,783 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 203 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (age 18-89) with idiopathic PD diagnosis according to the United Kingdom (UK) Brain Bank Criteria with bilateral motor symptoms.
  • Hoehn and Yahr Stages 1-3.
  • MoCA score >24 to screen out patients with dementia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior exposure to guitar training.
  • History of prior trauma of the brain or upper extremities.
  • Inability to personally consent to study.
  • Inability or unwillingness to participate in twice weekly classes for 6 weeks.
  • Agitation or hallucinations.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early-start guitar instruction group

    A 6 week twice-weekly non-traditional group guitar instruction will be implemented in addition to usual treatment between weeks 1-6 of the study.

    Other: Non-traditional group guitar instruction

  • Experimental
    Delayed-start guitar instruction group

    A 6 week twice-weekly non-traditional group guitar instruction will be implemented in addition to usual treatment between weeks 8-13 of the study.

    Other: Non-traditional group guitar instruction

Interventions

  • OtherNon-traditional group guitar instruction

    A 6-week curriculum for non-traditional training in finger-style guitar has been developed with rhythmic and goal oriented upper extremity and finger movements. Guitar group intervention will be implemented at the Towson campus of the Peabody Preparatory. Intervention approaches will include rhythmic digital grip with finger isolation, goal directed rhythmic reach on the fret-board and rhythmic alternating tap-like digit and hand movements on the guitar. Participants will be provided with the instruments in the group setting without expectation of practice at home.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility

    Percentage of study completion will be used to assess feasibility of the intervention along with descriptive statistics. The study will be deemed feasible if 80% of participants complete 10 or more guitar group interventions. The factors that affect probability of attending guitar classes will also be investigated.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy: Quality of Life

    The Parkinson disease quality of life assessment (PDQ-39) (Peto, Jenkinson \& Fitzpatrick, 1998) is a questionnaire that is designed to assess PD specific health related quality of life within the last month in individuals with PD. Dimensions covered include mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma and social support, cognition, communication and bodily support.

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 week follow up

  2. Upper extremity motor function

    Movement Disorder Society- Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks follow up

  3. Fine manual dexterity

    Purdue pegboard test (PPBT) involves timed assembly of small items and assesses fine manual dexterity.

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks follow up

  4. Gross manual dexterity

    Box and block test (BBT) involves timed transfer of 2.5cm3 blocks from one container to another and assesses the gross manual dexterity.

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks follow up

  5. Upper extremity activities of daily living function

    Quick-Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) (Gummeson, Ward \& Atroshi, 2006) is an 11-item questionnaire that measures the self-reported disability of upper extremity.

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks follow up

  6. Upper extremity finger typing accuracy and speed

    Finger typing task: Using index and middle finger to press 2 adjacent standard keyboard keys ('n' and 'm' for the right hand; 'c' and 'v' for the left hand) in alternating fashion as rapidly and accurately as possible in 60 seconds (each hand tested separately).

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks follow up

  7. Cognition

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (Nasreddine, 2005) is a rapid cognitive screening test that assesses cognitive performance in multiple domains including visuo-spatial and executive functions, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, and orientation.

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 week follow up

  8. Mood

    Geriatric Depression Scale (GD S-15) (Sheikh \& Yesavage, 1986) is a 15 item questionnaire that assesses depression and suicide ideation in elderly individuals.

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 week follow up

  9. Social Participation

    World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) Social participation subscale. WHODAS 2.0 is a 36 item disability assessment questionnaire developed by the WHO Classification, Terminology and Standards team to measure health and disability. The social participation subscale (Domain 6) contains 8 items and measures impact of health on social participation.

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks follow up

  10. Group participation

    Pittsburg Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS) will be used to monitor participation intensity and quality of the participants in the guitar group intervention.

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks follow up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins University (Peabody Institute & Department of Neurology)
    Baltimore, Maryland 21202, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Altenmuller E, Marco-Pallares J, Munte TF, Schneider S. Neural reorganization underlies improvement in stroke-induced motor dysfunction by music-supported therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:395-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04580.x. PubMed 19673814 ↗
  • Austin D, Jimison H, Hayes T, Mattek N, Kaye J, Pavel M. Measuring motor speed through typing: a surrogate for the finger tapping test. Behav Res Methods. 2011 Dec;43(4):903-9. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0100-1. PubMed 21494919 ↗
  • Benoit CE, Dalla Bella S, Farrugia N, Obrig H, Mainka S, Kotz SA. Musically cued gait-training improves both perceptual and motor timing in Parkinson's disease. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 7;8:494. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00494. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25071522 ↗
  • Bloem BR, de Vries NM, Ebersbach G. Nonpharmacological treatments for patients with Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2015 Sep 15;30(11):1504-20. doi: 10.1002/mds.26363. Epub 2015 Aug 14. PubMed 26274930 ↗
  • de Dreu MJ, van der Wilk AS, Poppe E, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE. Rehabilitation, exercise therapy and music in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of the effects of music-based movement therapy on walking ability, balance and quality of life. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012 Jan;18 Suppl 1:S114-9. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(11)70036-0. PubMed 22166406 ↗
  • Dorsey ER, George BP, Leff B, Willis AW. The coming crisis: obtaining care for the growing burden of neurodegenerative conditions. Neurology. 2013 May 21;80(21):1989-96. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318293e2ce. Epub 2013 Apr 24. PubMed 23616157 ↗
  • Francois C, Grau-Sanchez J, Duarte E, Rodriguez-Fornells A. Musical training as an alternative and effective method for neuro-education and neuro-rehabilitation. Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 28;6:475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00475. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25972820 ↗
  • Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt PA, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N; Movement Disorder Society UPDRS Revision Task Force. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. 2008 Nov 15;23(15):2129-70. doi: 10.1002/mds.22340. PubMed 19025984 ↗
  • Grau-Sanchez J, Amengual JL, Rojo N, Veciana de Las Heras M, Montero J, Rubio F, Altenmuller E, Munte TF, Rodriguez-Fornells A. Plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex induced by Music-supported therapy in stroke patients: a TMS study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 3;7:494. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00494. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24027507 ↗
  • Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-44. PubMed 16709254 ↗
  • Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Mar;55(3):181-4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181. PubMed 1564476 ↗
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. Erratum In: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1991. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15925. PubMed 15817019 ↗
  • Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R. PDQ-39: a review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. J Neurol. 1998 May;245 Suppl 1:S10-4. doi: 10.1007/pl00007730. PubMed 9617716 ↗
  • Pohl P, Dizdar N, Hallert E. The Ronnie Gardiner Rhythm and Music Method - a feasibility study in Parkinson's disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(26):2197-204. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.774060. Epub 2013 Mar 12. PubMed 23480646 ↗
  • Proud EL, Miller KJ, Bilney B, Balachandran S, McGinley JL, Morris ME. Evaluation of measures of upper limb functioning and disability in people with Parkinson disease: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Mar;96(3):540-551.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Oct 7. PubMed 25301441 ↗
  • Pringsheim T, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves TD. The prevalence of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2014 Nov;29(13):1583-90. doi: 10.1002/mds.25945. Epub 2014 Jun 28. PubMed 24976103 ↗
  • Raglio A. Music Therapy Interventions in Parkinson's Disease: The State-of-the-Art. Front Neurol. 2015 Aug 31;6:185. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00185. eCollection 2015. No abstract available. PubMed 26379619 ↗
  • Rochester L, Baker K, Hetherington V, Jones D, Willems AM, Kwakkel G, Van Wegen E, Lim I, Nieuwboer A. Evidence for motor learning in Parkinson's disease: acquisition, automaticity and retention of cued gait performance after training with external rhythmical cues. Brain Res. 2010 Mar 10;1319:103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Jan 11. PubMed 20064492 ↗
  • Schneider S, Schonle PW, Altenmuller E, Munte TF. Using musical instruments to improve motor skill recovery following a stroke. J Neurol. 2007 Oct;254(10):1339-46. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0523-2. Epub 2007 Jan 27. PubMed 17260171 ↗
  • Van Vugt FT, Ritter J, Rollnik JD, Altenmuller E. Music-supported motor training after stroke reveals no superiority of synchronization in group therapy. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 20;8:315. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00315. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24904358 ↗
  • Hartigan, B. J., & Sarrafian, S. K. (2004). Kinesiology and functional characteristics of upper limb. In D. G. Smith, J. W. Michael, & J. H. Bowker (Eds.), Atlas of amputations and limb deficiencies: surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles (3rd Edition ed., pp. 101-116). Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
  • Sheikh J.I., & Yesavage J.A. (1986): Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In: Brink TL, editor. Clinical Gerontology: A Guide to Assessment and Intervention. Binghampton,NY: The Haworth Press. 165-173.
  • Richard K Miller and Associates. (2012). The 2012-2013 Leisure Market Research Handbook. Loganville, GA: Richard K. Miller and Associates.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02925065
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 5, 2016
Start date
Mar 5, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 7, 2018
Completion
Jul 26, 2018
Last update
Oct 2, 2018

Study contacts

Serap E Bastepe-Gray, MD, MM, MsOT
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University
Alexander Pantelyat, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion