CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02924376Updated Aug 14, 2025Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Pemigatinib in Subjects With Advanced/Metastatic or Surgically Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma Who Failed Previous Therapy - (FIGHT-202)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Pemigatinib in Cholangiocarcinoma, sponsored by Incyte Corporation. Completed at 120 sites in 12 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-14.

Sponsored by Incyte Corporation · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
147
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is evaluate the efficacy of pemigatinib in subjects with advanced/metastatic or surgically unresectable cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 translocation who have failed at least 1 previous treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholangiocarcinoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cholangiocarcinoma
  • fibroblast growth factor (FGF)
  • fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)
  • FGF/FGFR alterations
03

In context

Cholangiocarcinoma

914 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholangiocarcinoma; 286 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 147 is above the median of 50 across 687 interventional studies indexed under Cholangiocarcinoma.

Browse Cholangiocarcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Incyte Corporation is the lead sponsor of 286 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Of its 144 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 93 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma.
  • Radiographically measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST v1.1.
  • Tumor assessment for FGF/FGFR gene alteration status.
  • Documented disease progression after at least 1 line of prior systemic therapy.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2.
  • Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior receipt of a selective FGFR inhibitor.
  • History of and/or current evidence of ectopic mineralization/calcification, including but not limited to soft tissue, kidneys, intestine, myocardia, or lung, excepting calcified lymph nodes and asymptomatic arterial or cartilage/tendon calcifications.
  • Current evidence of clinically significant corneal or retinal disorder confirmed by ophthalmologic examination.
  • Use of any potent CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers within 14 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is shorter, before the first dose of study drug. Topical ketoconazole will be allowed.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
147 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort A Pemigatinib

    Pemigatinib in subjects with FGFR2 translocation with a documented fusion partner in central laboratory report

    Drug: Pemigatinib

  • Experimental
    Cohort B Pemigatinib

    Pemigatinibin subjects with other FGF/FGFR alterations

    Drug: Pemigatinib

  • Experimental
    Cohort C Pemigatinib

    Pemigatinib in subjects negative for FGF/FGFR alteration

    Drug: Pemigatinib

Interventions

  • DrugPemigatinib

    Pemigatinibonce a day by mouth for 2 consecutive weeks and 1 week off therapy

    Also known as: INCB054828

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With FGFR2 Rearrangements or Fusions

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at any post-Baseline visit prior to first progressive disease (PD), per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (v1.1). CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. ORR was based on central genomics laboratory results. Response was based on review of scans by an independent centralized radiological review committee.

    Time frame: up to 1527 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. ORR in Participants FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or Fusions

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR at any post-Baseline visit prior to first PD, per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. ORR was based on central genomics laboratory results. Response was based on review of scans by an independent centralized radiological review committee.

    Time frame: up to 424 days

  2. ORR in All Participants With FGF/FGFR Alterations

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR at any post-Baseline visit prior to first PD, per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. ORR was based on central genomics laboratory results. Response was based on review of scans by an independent centralized radiological review committee.

    Time frame: up to 1527 days

  3. ORR in Participants Negative for FGF/FGFR Alterations

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR at any post-Baseline visit prior to first PD, per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. ORR was based on central genomics laboratory results. Response was based on review of scans by an independent centralized radiological review committee.

    Time frame: up to 143 days

  4. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the length of time from the first dose of study drug (Day 1) to the earlier of death or disease progression by RECIST v1.1, as assessed by the independent centralized radiological review committee.

    Time frame: up to 50.17 months

  5. Duration of Response (DOR)

    DOR was defined as the time from the first overall response contributing to an objective response (CR or PR) as assessed by an independent centralized radiological review committee to the earlier of death or first overall response of PD occurring after the first overall response contributing to the objective response. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. PD: progression of a target or non-target lesion or presence of a new lesion.

    Time frame: up to 47.11 months

  6. Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with an overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. PD: progression of a target or non-target lesion or presence of a new lesion. SD: no change in target lesions to qualify for CR, PR, or PD.

    Time frame: up to 1527 days

  7. Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as the length of time from the first dose of study drug (Day 1) until the date of death due to any cause.

    Time frame: up to 51.32 months

  8. Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. Abnormal laboratory values or test results occurring after informed consent constituted AEs only if they induced clinical signs or symptoms, were considered clinically meaningful, required therapy (e.g., hematologic abnormality that required transfusion), or required changes in the study drug(s). A TEAE was defined as any adverse event either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last dose of study drug.

    Time frame: up to 1584 days

  9. First-order Absorption Rate Constant (ka) of Pemigatinib

    First-order absorption rate constant is defined as the rate at which a drug enters into the system.

    Time frame: Predose; 1-2 hours post-dose; 4-12 hours post-dose

  10. CL/F of Pemigatinib

    CL/F is defined as apparent oral clearance.

    Time frame: Predose; 1-2 hours post-dose; 4-12 hours post-dose

  11. Vc/F of Pemigatinib

    Vc/F is defined as the apparent volume of distribution for the central compartment of pemigatinib.

    Time frame: Predose; 1-2 hours post-dose; 4-12 hours post-dose

  12. Vp/F of Pemigatinib

    Vp/F is defined as the apparent volume of distribution for the tissue (peripheral) compartment.

    Time frame: Predose; 1-2 hours post-dose; 4-12 hours post-dose

07

Results

Posted Feb 23, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOther
Started10820172
Completed0000
Not completed10820172
Withdrew: Progressive disease4010
Withdrew: Death7318152
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3000
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor19000
Withdrew: Physician decision1000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject7210
Withdrew: Rolled over to another study1000

Outcome measures

PrimaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With FGFR2 Rearrangements or Fusions

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at any post-Baseline visit prior to first progressive disease (PD), per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (v1.1). CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. ORR was based on central genomics laboratory results. Response was based on review of scans by an independent centralized radiological review committee.

Time frame:
up to 1527 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With FGFR2 Rearrangements or Fusions
percentage of participantsCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOther
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With FGFR2 Rearrangements or Fusions37.0 (27.94 to 46.86)———
SecondaryORR in Participants FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or Fusions

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR at any post-Baseline visit prior to first PD, per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. ORR was based on central genomics laboratory results. Response was based on review of scans by an independent centralized radiological review committee.

Time frame:
up to 424 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
ORR in Participants FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or Fusions
percentage of participantsCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOther
ORR in Participants FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or Fusions—0.0 (0.0 to 16.84)——
SecondaryORR in All Participants With FGF/FGFR Alterations

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR at any post-Baseline visit prior to first PD, per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. ORR was based on central genomics laboratory results. Response was based on review of scans by an independent centralized radiological review committee.

Time frame:
up to 1527 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
ORR in All Participants With FGF/FGFR Alterations
percentage of participantsCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOtherCohort A + Cohort B
ORR in All Participants With FGF/FGFR Alterations————31.3 (23.35 to 40.04)
SecondaryORR in Participants Negative for FGF/FGFR Alterations

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR at any post-Baseline visit prior to first PD, per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. ORR was based on central genomics laboratory results. Response was based on review of scans by an independent centralized radiological review committee.

Time frame:
up to 143 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
ORR in Participants Negative for FGF/FGFR Alterations
percentage of participantsCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOther
ORR in Participants Negative for FGF/FGFR Alterations——0.0 (0.0 to 19.51)—
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the length of time from the first dose of study drug (Day 1) to the earlier of death or disease progression by RECIST v1.1, as assessed by the independent centralized radiological review committee.

Time frame:
up to 50.17 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOther
Progression-free Survival (PFS)7.03 (6.08 to 10.48)2.10 (1.18 to 4.86)1.51 (1.38 to 1.84)—
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the time from the first overall response contributing to an objective response (CR or PR) as assessed by an independent centralized radiological review committee to the earlier of death or first overall response of PD occurring after the first overall response contributing to the objective response. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. PD: progression of a target or non-target lesion or presence of a new lesion.

Time frame:
up to 47.11 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response (DOR)
monthsCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOther
Duration of Response (DOR)9.13 (6.01 to 14.49)———
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with an overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. PD: progression of a target or non-target lesion or presence of a new lesion. SD: no change in target lesions to qualify for CR, PR, or PD.

Time frame:
up to 1527 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
percentage of participantsCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOther
Disease Control Rate (DCR)82.4 (73.9 to 89.1)40.0 (19.1 to 63.9)17.6 (3.8 to 43.4)—
SecondaryOverall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the length of time from the first dose of study drug (Day 1) until the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame:
up to 51.32 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOther
Overall Survival17.48 (14.36 to 22.93)6.70 (2.10 to 10.55)3.98 (1.97 to 4.60)—
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. Abnormal laboratory values or test results occurring after informed consent constituted AEs only if they induced clinical signs or symptoms, were considered clinically meaningful, required therapy (e.g., hematologic abnormality that required transfusion), or required changes in the study drug(s). A TEAE was defined as any adverse event either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last dose of study drug.

Time frame:
up to 1584 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
ParticipantsCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOther
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)10820172
SecondaryFirst-order Absorption Rate Constant (ka) of Pemigatinib

First-order absorption rate constant is defined as the rate at which a drug enters into the system.

Time frame:
Predose; 1-2 hours post-dose; 4-12 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · 1/hour
First-order Absorption Rate Constant (ka) of Pemigatinib
1/hourAll Cohorts
First-order Absorption Rate Constant (ka) of Pemigatinib1.29 ± 0.827
SecondaryCL/F of Pemigatinib

CL/F is defined as apparent oral clearance.

Time frame:
Predose; 1-2 hours post-dose; 4-12 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · Liters/hour
CL/F of Pemigatinib
Liters/hourAll Cohorts
CL/F of Pemigatinib12.2 ± 5.28
SecondaryVc/F of Pemigatinib

Vc/F is defined as the apparent volume of distribution for the central compartment of pemigatinib.

Time frame:
Predose; 1-2 hours post-dose; 4-12 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · Liters
Vc/F of Pemigatinib
LitersAll Cohorts
Vc/F of Pemigatinib144 ± 55.7
SecondaryVp/F of Pemigatinib

Vp/F is defined as the apparent volume of distribution for the tissue (peripheral) compartment.

Time frame:
Predose; 1-2 hours post-dose; 4-12 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · Liters
Vp/F of Pemigatinib
LitersAll Cohorts
Vp/F of Pemigatinib85.6 ± 30.5

Adverse events

Collected over up to 1584 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or Fusions76/108 (70.4%)46/108 (42.6%)108/108 (100%)
Cohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or Fusions18/20 (90%)10/20 (50%)20/20 (100%)
Cohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR Alterations15/17 (88.2%)12/17 (70.6%)17/17 (100%)
Other2/2 (100%)0/2 (0%)2/2 (100%)
Total111/147 (75.5%)68/147 (46.3%)147/147 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 81
Most frequent serious events
EventCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOtherTotal
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders4/1081/202/170/27/147
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1080/202/170/22/147
HyponatraemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/1082/200/170/23/147
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/1082/201/170/25/147
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders2/1080/201/170/23/147
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1080/201/170/22/147
Anaphylactic reactionImmune system disorders0/1080/201/170/21/147
BilomaHepatobiliary disorders0/1080/201/170/21/147
Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations1/1080/201/170/22/147
CholangitisHepatobiliary disorders5/1080/201/170/26/147
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 194
Most frequent other events
EventCohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOtherTotal
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders64/1084/203/172/273/147
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders42/1085/201/172/250/147
Dry skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders30/1080/200/172/232/147
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders45/1083/203/172/253/147
HyperphosphataemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders60/10813/2012/171/286/147
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders58/1085/206/171/270/147
FatigueGeneral disorders50/1085/209/170/264/147
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders22/1083/203/171/229/147
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolongedInvestigations3/1080/200/171/24/147
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders46/1085/202/171/254/147

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOtherTotal
Mean55.2 ± 12.0061.9 ± 10.9965.6 ± 7.1241.0 ± 14.1457.1 ± 12.08
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOtherTotal
Female66117185
Male42910162
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOtherTotal
White799142104
Black or African American70108
Asian12110023
American-Indian/Alaska Native00101
Captured as "Other"40105
Missing60006
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cohort A: FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort B: FGF/FGFR Alterations Other Than FGFR2 Rearrangements or FusionsCohort C: Negative for FGF/FGFR AlterationsOtherTotal
Hispanic or Latino20406
Not Hispanic or Latino8818132121
Not Reported1500015
Unknown10001
Captured as "Other"22004
08

Study locations

120 sites
  • Anchorage, Alaska, United States
  • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Tempe, Arizona, United States
  • Tucson, Arizona, United States
  • Orange, California, United States
  • San Francisco, California, United States
  • Aurora, Colorado, United States
  • Denver, Colorado, United States
  • New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Newark, Delaware, United States
  • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
  • Gainesville, Florida, United States
  • Miami Beach, Florida, United States
  • Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Evanston, Illinois, United States
  • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
  • Sioux City, Iowa, United States
  • Westwood, Kansas, United States
  • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Rochester, Minnesota, United States
  • Woodbury, Minnesota, United States
  • St Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Billings, Montana, United States
  • Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • Morristown, New Jersey, United States
  • New York, New York, United States
  • Rochester, New York, United States
  • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
  • Goldsboro, North Carolina, United States
  • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
  • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
  • Arlington, Texas, United States
  • Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Grapevine, Texas, United States
  • San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • The Woodlands, Texas, United States
  • Tyler, Texas, United States
  • Waco, Texas, United States
  • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Fairfax, Virginia, United States
  • Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Brussels, Belgium
  • Ghent, Belgium
  • Kortrijk, Belgium
  • Leuven, Belgium
  • Montpellier, Herault, France
  • Villejuif, Herault, France
  • Avignon, France
  • Clichy, France
  • Paris, France
  • Toulouse, France
  • Berlin, Germany
  • Bonn, Germany
  • Dresden, Germany
  • Hanover, Germany
  • Homburg, Germany
  • Leipzig, Germany
  • Mainz, Germany
  • Tübingen, Germany
  • Jerusalem, Israel
  • Petah Tikva, Israel
  • Ramat Gan, Israel
  • Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Bari, Castellana Grotte, Italy
  • San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
  • Bergamo, Italy
  • Bologna, Italy
  • Candiolo, Italy
  • Catania, Italy
  • Faenza, Italy
  • Lecce, Italy
  • Meldola, Italy
  • Milan, Italy
  • Naples, Italy
  • Rimini, Italy
  • Siena, Italy
  • Verona, Italy
  • Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
  • Chiba, Chiba, Japan
  • Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
  • Osaka, Osaka, Japan
  • Osakasayama-shi, Osaka, Japan
  • Kitaadachi, Saitama, Japan
  • Sunto, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Kōtoku, Tokyo-To, Japan
  • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo-To, Japan
  • Goyang-si, South Korea
  • Seongnam-si, South Korea
  • Seoul, South Korea
  • Pamplona, Navarre, Spain

Showing the first 100 of 120 sites across 12 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Patel TH, Marcus L, Horiba MN, Donoghue M, Chatterjee S, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Schuck RN, Li Y, Zhang X, Fourie Zirkelbach J, Charlab R, Liu J, Yang Y, Lemery SJ, Pazdur R, Theoret MR, Fashoyin-Aje LA. FDA Approval Summary: Pemigatinib for Previously Treated, Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 Fusion or Other Rearrangement. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Mar 1;29(5):838-842. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2036. PubMed 36206041 ↗
  • Bibeau K, Feliz L, Lihou CF, Ren H, Abou-Alfa GK. Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Cholangiocarcinoma With or Without FGF/FGFR Alterations: A FIGHT-202 Post Hoc Analysis of Prior Systemic Therapy Response. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Apr;6:e2100414. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00414. PubMed 35544727 ↗
  • Abou-Alfa GK, Sahai V, Hollebecque A, Vaccaro G, Melisi D, Al-Rajabi R, Paulson AS, Borad MJ, Gallinson D, Murphy AG, Oh DY, Dotan E, Catenacci DV, Van Cutsem E, Ji T, Lihou CF, Zhen H, Feliz L, Vogel A. Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):671-684. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30109-1. Epub 2020 Mar 20. PubMed 32203698 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Apr 2, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 15, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Incyte shares data with qualified external researchers after a research proposal is submitted. These requests are reviewed and approved by a review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. The trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.incyte.com/our-company/compliance-and-transparency

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02924376
Lead sponsor
Incyte Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 5, 2016
Start date
Jan 16, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2022
Completion
Feb 1, 2022
Results posted
Feb 23, 2023
Last update
Aug 14, 2025

Study contacts

Luis Féliz Vinas, MD
study director · Incyte Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion