ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02911987LBP-HIT-RCTUpdated Aug 9, 2017

Structural and Functional Effects of High Intensity Training (HIT) Program in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

An interventional study of high intensity training (HIT) program and moderate intensity training (MIT) exercise therapy in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Hasselt University. Status unknown at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-09.

Sponsored by Hasselt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Low back pain is a common disorder, occurring worldwide in both males and females in all age groups. The prevalence is higher in females and the incidence peaks between 30 and 65 years. It is currently the most frequent musculoskeletal cause of functional disability and it has a major socio-economic impact on today's society. Although a small percentage of persons with low back pain can be diagnosed with a specific underlying cause, almost 90% of persons with low back pain present with symptoms of nonspecific origin. A part of these symptoms are only of short duration, but 23% of all people will develop nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP).

Exercise therapy (ET) is currently an important component in the treatment of NSCLBP. Previous studies analysed the effects of various modes of exercise therapy, such as motor control therapy, core stability training and aerobic conditioning training. However, therapy outcomes can be low, and guidelines in favour of using a specific program are contradictory. It thus still remains unclear which therapy modality is best suited. Furthermore, no recommendations are available about optimal training intensities during rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP.

Since as well aerobic as muscular deconditioning are apparent in persons with chronic low back pain and improvements in overall physical fitness can affect therapy outcomes in this population, ET specifically focussing on physical fitness can be advocated for NSCLBP rehabilitation. High Intensity Training (HIT), has been promoted as an effective and efficient training method for improving physical fitness and health related parameters in healthy persons. Also, HIT resulted in successful reconditioning and improvement of functional and disease related outcomes in persons with other chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, heart failure, COPD and cardiometabolic diseases. Although some studies showed promising results for the effect of HIT on low back pain such as high intensity isolated, evidence is still scarce and study results are unclear because of methodological shortcomings.

The aim of this randomized clinical trial study is to evaluate the effects of a HIT program on disease related outcomes, physical fitness and muscle contractile characteristics compared to a conventional rehabilitation program in persons with NSCLBP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,875 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 484 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 125 is above the median of 60 across 2,315 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Hasselt University is the lead sponsor of 203 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. medically diagnosed with non-specific chronic low back pain,
  2. over 25 years old,
  3. Oswestry Disability Index: disability score >20%,
  4. able to understand Dutch (spoken and written),
  5. Physical Activities Scale For Individuals with Physical Disabilities \<30. -

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. invasive surgery at the lumbar spine in the last 18 months (arthrodesis was excluded, microsurgery was allowed),
  2. radiculopathy (uni- or bilateral),
  3. co-morbidities: paresis and/or sensory disturbances by neurological causes, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, an increase of pain of 3 points with a result of > 8/10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in the last 48 hours, pregnancy,
  4. ongoing compensation claims and/or (work)disability > 6 months,
  5. rehabilitation/exercise therapy program for LBP in the past 6 months. -
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
125 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    the 'cardio' HIT group

    Group 1 receives HIT exercise, aimed only at improving cardiovascular endurance (the 'cardio' HIT group).

    Other: high intensity training (HIT) program

  • Experimental
    the 'general' HIT group

    Group 2 receives HIT exercise aimed at improving both cardiovascular and general muscle condition (the 'general' HIT group ).

    Other: high intensity training (HIT) program

  • Experimental
    the 'lumbar' HIT group

    Group 3 receives HIT exercise, aimed at improving both cardiovascular condition and specific trunk muscle condition (the 'lumbar' HIT group).

    Other: high intensity training (HIT) program

  • Experimental
    the 'combined' HIT group

    Group 4 receives HIT exercise which is a combination of previous programs (cardiovascular fitness, muscular fitness and general training specific trunk muscles) (the 'combined' HIT group). These trainings will take place in the REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center on the campus of Hasselt University in Diepenbeek.

    Other: high intensity training (HIT) program

  • Active comparator
    control group

    Group 5 receives MIT exercise consisting of a combination of previous programs (cardiovascular fitness, muscular fitness and general training specific trunk muscles) (the 'MIT' group)

    Other: moderate intensity training (MIT) exercise therapy

Interventions

  • Otherhigh intensity training (HIT) program

    The participants are randomly divided through use of sealed envelopes into four groups that all follow high intensity training (HIT) programs. Each training group follows of a 12 week program (2x/week, 2h). All training will be conducted under the guidance of expert therapists.

  • Othermoderate intensity training (MIT) exercise therapy

    MIT exercise consisting of a combination of previous programs (cardiovascular fitness, muscular fitness and general training specific trunk muscles) (the 'MIT' group).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a nominal scale on which the participant indicates the amount of pain he/she perceives at that current moment. It consists of a line indicating eleven successive scores (0-10), whereby score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'worst pain imaginable'. An improvement of 2 levels or more is accepted as clinically relevant.

    Time frame: day 1

  2. pain

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Time frame: week 6

  3. pain

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Time frame: week 12

  4. Kinesiophobia

    The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.

    Time frame: day 1

  5. Kinesiophobia

    The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.

    Time frame: week 6

  6. Kinesiophobia

    The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.

    Time frame: week 12

  7. Physical disability RMDQ

    The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference.

    Time frame: day 1

  8. Physical disability RMDQ

    The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference.

    Time frame: week 6

  9. Physical disability RMDQ

    The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference.

    Time frame: week 12

  10. Endurance capacity

    Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer

    Time frame: day 1

  11. Endurance capacity

    Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer

    Time frame: week 6

  12. Endurance capacity

    Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer

    Time frame: week 12

  13. Abdominal/back strength

    The maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).

    Time frame: day 1

  14. Abdominal/back strength

    The maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).

    Time frame: week 6

  15. Abdominal/back strength

    The maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).

    Time frame: week 12

  16. Muscle Biopsy

    muscle biopsies of the paravertebral muscles of the spine are obtained through a micro biopsy procedure (Biopsy gun, Bard Medical). This is done by a trained physician with extensive experience in taking muscle biopsies. The obtained muscle samples are divided into cryovials, per subject and per measurement (for the determination of muscle fiber CSA, muscle fiber characterization, distribution, angiogenesis, muscle fiber characteristics, etc.). Safety Issue: Yes, taking a piece of muscle tissue, can be slightly painful, but there are no serious risks involved. There will be no permanent damage to the muscle. The risk of infection in the wound can never be excluded. However, the site of the biopsy is thoroughly decontaminated and sealed in order to achieve a good wound healing and prevent an infection. A local bleeding may occur in the muscle causing a bruise.

    Time frame: day 1

  17. Muscle Biopsy

    muscle biopsies of the paravertebral muscles of the spine are obtained through a micro biopsy procedure (Biopsy gun, Bard Medical). This is done by a trained physician with extensive experience in taking muscle biopsies. The obtained muscle samples are divided into cryovials, per subject and per measurement (for the determination of muscle fiber CSA, muscle fiber characterization, distribution, angiogenesis, muscle fiber characteristics, etc.). Safety Issue: Yes, taking a piece of muscle tissue, can be slightly painful, but there are no serious risks involved. There will be no permanent damage to the muscle. The risk of infection in the wound can never be excluded. However, the site of the biopsy is thoroughly decontaminated and sealed in order to achieve a good wound healing and prevent an infection. A local bleeding may occur in the muscle causing a bruise.

    Time frame: week 12

  18. Physical disability ODI

    The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating constraints experienced by people in their daily activities due to chronic low back pain. It consists of 10 items that are scored on a 5-point scale. The total score gives a percentage degree of limitation for the patient.

    Time frame: day 1

  19. Physical disability ODI

    The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating constraints experienced by people in their daily activities due to chronic low back pain. It consists of 10 items that are scored on a 5-point scale. The total score gives a percentage degree of limitation for the patient.

    Time frame: week 6

  20. Physical disability ODI

    The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating constraints experienced by people in their daily activities due to chronic low back pain. It consists of 10 items that are scored on a 5-point scale. The total score gives a percentage degree of limitation for the patient.

    Time frame: week 12

  21. activity level

    Physical Activities Scale For Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) The PASIPD is a questionnaire consisting of 13 items to measure the physical activity of people with disabilities. It provides information about leisure, household and work-related physical activity in the last 7 days.

    Time frame: day 1

  22. activity level

    Physical Activities Scale For Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) The PASIPD is a questionnaire consisting of 13 items to measure the physical activity of people with disabilities. It provides information about leisure, household and work-related physical activity in the last 7 days.

    Time frame: week 6

  23. activity level

    Physical Activities Scale For Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) The PASIPD is a questionnaire consisting of 13 items to measure the physical activity of people with disabilities. It provides information about leisure, household and work-related physical activity in the last 7 days.

    Time frame: week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Body composition

    The body composition is obtained by means of a dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan.

    Time frame: day 1

  2. Body composition

    The body composition is obtained by means of a dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan.

    Time frame: week 6

  3. Body composition

    The body composition is obtained by means of a dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan.

    Time frame: week 12

  4. physical activity tracking

    Activity of the daily routine will be evaluated by means of wearing an accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X activity monitors) (2 midweek days and 1 weekend day, 3 consecutive days) throughout the day. A schedule will be inventoried by the participant (diary).

    Time frame: day 1

  5. physical activity tracking

    Activity of the daily routine will be evaluated by means of wearing an accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X activity monitors) (2 midweek days and 1 weekend day, 3 consecutive days) throughout the day. A schedule will be inventoried by the participant (diary).

    Time frame: week 12

  6. disability in participation and quality of life

    Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) The SF-36 is a 36 item scale that assesses eight health concepts (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health) with the possibility of independent scoring for each.

    Time frame: day 1

  7. disability in participation and quality of life

    Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) The SF-36 is a 36 item scale that assesses eight health concepts (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health) with the possibility of independent scoring for each.

    Time frame: week 6

  8. disability in participation and quality of life

    Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) The SF-36 is a 36 item scale that assesses eight health concepts (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health) with the possibility of independent scoring for each.

    Time frame: week 12

  9. Motivation VAS

    The start motivation is measured by a visual analog scale (VAS).

    Time frame: day 1

  10. Motivation IMI

    At the end of the study setting viewing detailed motivation for the program based on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) (on T1).

    Time frame: day 1

  11. Motivation VAS

    The start motivation is measured by a visual analog scale (VAS).

    Time frame: week 6

  12. Motivation IMI

    At the end of the study setting viewing detailed motivation for the program based on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) (on T1).

    Time frame: week 6

  13. Motivation VAS

    The start motivation is measured by a visual analog scale (VAS).

    Time frame: week 12

  14. Motivation IMI

    At the end of the study setting viewing detailed motivation for the program based on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) (on T1).

    Time frame: week 12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 9, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02911987
Lead sponsor
Hasselt University
Collaborators
Jessa Hospital
Responsible party
Annick Timmermans (prof. dr., Hasselt University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 23, 2016
Start date
Aug 2016
Primary completion
Aug 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 9, 2017

Study contacts

Jonas Verbrugghe, drs.
Contact
jonas.verbrugghe@uhasselt.be
+ 32 11 26 92 39
Anouk Agten, drs.
Contact
anouk.agten@uhasselt.be
Annick Timmermans, prof. dr.
principal investigator · Hasselt University
Frank Vandenabeele, prof. dr.
principal investigator · Hasselt University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion