An interventional study of Tungsten halogen light with narrow bandpass filters in Age Related Macular Degeneration, Retinitis Pigmentosa and Congenital Stationary Night Blindness, sponsored by University of New Mexico. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-13.
Sponsored by University of New Mexico · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This pilot study will evaluate the visual response to infrared (IR) in humans after dark adaptation. The investigators plan to determine which wavelength and intensity the human eye is most sensitive to in healthy and color-blind participants by using a broad spectrum light source and wavelength-specific IR bandpass filters.
The long-term goal of this research is to better understand the role that IR plays in visual function, and whether this can be manipulated to allow for vision in certain retinal pathologies that result from loss of photoreceptor cells. The investigators central objective is to test the electrophysiologic response to IR in the dark-adapted retinal and visual pathways. The investigator's central hypothesis is that IR evokes a visual response in humans after dark adaptation, and the characteristics of this response suggest transient receptor potential (TRP) channel involvement. The investigators rationale is that a better understanding of how IR impacts vision may allow for an alternative mechanism for vision in a number of diseases that cause blindness from the degradation or loss of function of photoreceptor cells. The investigators will test the investigator's hypothesis with the following Aims:
Aim 1:
Arm 1: To determine the optimal IR wavelength for visual perception in dark-adapted human participants. The investigators hypothesize that the healthy human eye will detect IR irradiation, with a maximum sensitivity at a specific wavelength. Using a broad-spectrum light source with wavelength-specific bandpass filters, the spectral range of visual perception to IR will be evaluated.
Arm 2: To determine the optimal IR wavelength for visual perception in dark-adapted human participants who are colorblind. The investigators hypothesize that the colorblind human eye will detect IR irradiation, with a maximum sensitivity at a specific wavelength. Using a broad-spectrum light source with wavelength-specific bandpass filters, the spectral range of visual perception to IR will be evaluated.
BACKGROUND: Visual impairment affects 285 million people worldwide. The prevalence of visual impairment in the US is expected to rise from 3.3 million in 2000 to 5.5 million in 2020. This will exacerbate the current economic burden of vision loss, which is already $38.2 billion per year in direct and indirect costs. The leading cause of blindness in high-income countries is due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a disease that leads to gradual loss of the photoreceptor cell layer. An estimated 1.75 million people have AMD in the US and another 7.3 million are at risk. Importantly, despite the loss of photoreceptor cells in AMD, the other cellular layers in the retina remain largely intact.
The retina lines the back of the eye and is composed of structural layers. The outer nuclear layer contains photoreceptors called rods and cones. The inner nuclear layer includes bipolar, horizontal, and amacrine cells. Most anteriorly, the ganglion cell layer has axons that exit the eye as the optic nerve. Visual image formation begins when a photon of light enters the eye, passes through all retinal layers, and is absorbed by the photoreceptor cells. These cells transduce the photon of light into an electrochemical signal, which is communicated to bipolar cells, followed by the ganglion cells. Here, an action potential is generated and propagated via the optic nerve to the area of the brain where vision perception occurs. When the eye is dark-adapted, the cells in this pathway are potentially more sensitive to other types of stimuli, such as IR. The investigators believe cation channels called TRP channels in ganglion cells are activated by IR in this dark-adapted state, creating the visual response to IR. Heat is a known activator of certain subtypes of these channels elsewhere in the body. TRP channels are also responsible for IR vision in pit vipers and vampire bats.
Palczewska et al. reported that visual perception to IR occurred through a process of direct two-photon isomerization of visual pigments. However, other evidence suggests IR perception can occur through single IR photon absorption. Studies that use IR to test the functionality of implanted visual prosthesis have noted a greater response to IR in the non-implanted eye when compared to the implanted eye on both VEP tests and ERG. On ERG, a specialized response specific to IR was found called the scotopic threshold response (STR). This response occurs under dark-adapted conditions and correlates with a response at the ganglion cell layer. Direct IR activation of TRP channels on ganglion cells could initiate a visual response. Based on these findings, the investigators hypothesize the human response to IR under dark adaptation occurs at the level of the ganglion cells through heat-activated TRP channels.
RESEARCH DESIGN AIM1: To determine the optimal IR wavelength for human visual perception while dark-adapted in the healthy human eye.
Introduction for Aim 1: The objective of this aim is to determine the optimal wavelength of IR to which the human eye is sensitive. To obtain this objective, the investigators will test the working hypothesis that the healthy human eye, and those with colorblindness, will detect a range of IR wavelengths, with a preference for a specific wavelength. The investigators will test the working hypothesis using a broad-spectrum light source with wavelength-specific bandpass filters in the IR range. The investigators' rationale for this aim is that understanding the optimal IR wavelength of the human eye will aid in future investigations when testing the visual response to IR using diagnostic equipment. This is important because it could impact the way other ophthalmologic modalities use IR to diagnose and treat visual pathologies.
Research Design for Aim 1: A total of healthy 21 participants (15 with normal vision and 6 with colorblindness) aged 18 and older will be recruited using the University of New Mexico (UNM) Clinical and Translational Science Center (CTSC) Clinical Research Volunteer Registry HRRC-06412. Informed consent, participant demographics, past medial and visual history, and a general eye exam will be obtained using the CTSC research coordinator. Each participant will be placed in a dark room for an hour to allow for optimal dark adaptation of the eye. The investigators will use a broad-spectrum light source with wavelength-specific bandpass filters of different IR wavelengths. A total of 12 filters will be used ranging from 850 nm to 1400nm. Intensity curves will be built for each wavelength, by slowly turning up the power until the participant indicates a visual response to the stimulus.
Data Analysis for Aim 1: Data will be analyzed by the investigators. Descriptive statistics will be used to evaluate demographics, general and visual health information, and reported optimal wavelengths. The investigators' analysis will compare differences among responses for each wavelength. To the investigators' knowledge, there have been no studies evaluating which IR wavelength is optimal for human visual perception, thus the investigators assume a low effect size of 10%, which would produce an 82% chance of at least two out of 30 healthy participants giving a preferred response to a specific wavelength. The investigators will describe the estimated effect sizes in response to the findings.
Expected Outcomes for Aim 1: The investigators expect the human eye to perceive a range of IR wavelengths, but have a specific wavelength optimal in terms of brightness.
Potential Problems \& Alternative Strategies for Aim 1: To prevent sampling bias, the investigators plan to obtain a representative sample from New Mexico; however, participants may be younger and more educated than the general population. The confounding bias of light pollution may occur, which would prevent dark adaptation and decrease the IR sensitivity. A photometer will assess the room for background photons.
1,459 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 238 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 56 across 985 interventional studies indexed under Macular Degeneration.
Browse Macular Degeneration studies →University of New Mexico is the lead sponsor of 313 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.
Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (92%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
15 healthy participants will describe IR light passing through narrow bandpass filters over a broad-spectrum light source. As intensity increases from 0 to 12 V, participants will say if/when they see a visual response to infrared light from a broadband Tungsten halogen light with narrow bandpass filters ranging from 850 nm to 1400 nm. At the end of three trials per filter, the intensity will be turned up to 12 V, and participants will describe the color they see.
Other: Tungsten halogen light with narrow bandpass filters
6 colorblind participants will describe IR light passing through narrow bandpass filters over a broad-spectrum light source. As intensity increases from 0 to 12 V, participants will say if/when they see a visual response to infrared light from a broadband Tungsten halogen light with narrow bandpass filters ranging from 850 nm to 1400 nm. At the end of three trials per filter, the intensity will be turned up to 12 V, and participants will describe the color they see.
Other: Tungsten halogen light with narrow bandpass filters
As intensity in increased from 0 to 12 V, participants will say if/when they see a visual response to infrared light from a broad band tungsten halogen light source that passes through narrow bandpass filters ranging from 850 nm to 1400 nm. At the end of three trials per filter, the intensity will be turned up to 12 V, and participants will describe the color they see.
Visual Perception to Infrared: Mean Minimal Intensity (uW) at Which Participants Could See IR Between 900 - 1400 nm.
We measured the minimum threshold intensities (uW) via subjective perception of near IR light (900 - 1400 nm) in 50 nm intervals. After 30 minutes of dark adaptation and over three trials, participants verbalized by saying 'yes' to the minimal intensity they could see the IR stimulus as the power source for the light was slowly increased from 0V to 12 V. The voltage was averaged for the three trials at each wavelength. Analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effect of the wavelength on the threshold intensity. This was done for two groups/arms, one with normal color vision and one with colorblind vision.
Time frame: after 30 minutes of dark adaptation, up to 2 hours
Description of Color
A subjective description of color was given by each participant for each wavelength between 850 - 1400nm while at 12V.
Time frame: after 30 minutes of dark adaptation, up to 2 hours
Healthy adult participants with normal vision or who are colorblind were recruited using the University of New Mexico CTSC Clinical Research Volunteer Registry (HRRC 06-412), a Craigslist advertisement, and word of mouth.
| Milestone | Visual Response to IR |
|---|---|
| Started | 21 |
| Completed | 21 |
| Not completed | 0 |
We measured the minimum threshold intensities (uW) via subjective perception of near IR light (900 - 1400 nm) in 50 nm intervals. After 30 minutes of dark adaptation and over three trials, participants verbalized by saying 'yes' to the minimal intensity they could see the IR stimulus as the power source for the light was slowly increased from 0V to 12 V. The voltage was averaged for the three trials at each wavelength. Analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effect of the wavelength on the threshold intensity. This was done for two groups/arms, one with normal color vision and one with colorblind vision.
| uW | Normal Color Vision | Colorblind Vision |
|---|---|---|
| 850 nm | 0.671770454 ± 0.099031306 | 0.809204 ± 0.141801 |
| 900 nm | 0.205456012 ± 0.037481007 | 0.222247 ± 0.042895 |
| 950 nm | 0.281608408 ± 0.070729646 | 0.545299 ± 0.571049 |
| 1000 nm | 1.144748348 ± 0.607965504 | 1.056031 ± 0.792399 |
| 1050 nm | 1.272084129 ± 0.672594905 | 1.397371 ± 0.90500 |
| 1100 nm | 0.258018884 ± 0.089276004 | 0.367814 ± 0.205764 |
| 1150 nm | 1.353030502 ± 0.911531487 | 2.144498 ± 1.049761 |
| 1200 nm | 0.345439815 ± 0.143985558 | 0.422416 ± 0.119660 |
| 1250 nm | 0.341422349 ± 0.194358383 | 0.505195 ± 0.229724 |
| 1300 nm | 0.153133406 ± 0.097493319 | 0.198776 ± 0.095276 |
| 1350 nm | 0.119277641 ± 0.0881392 | 0.182666 ± 0.067348 |
| 1400 nm | 0.419039248 ± 0.158978102 | 0.601534 ± 0.184694 |
A subjective description of color was given by each participant for each wavelength between 850 - 1400nm while at 12V.
| Participants | Visual Response to IR in Colorvision Eyes | Visual Response to IR in Colorblind Eyes |
|---|---|---|
| Color perception at 850 λ — Red | 12 | 4 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Dark Red | 3 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Orange | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Yellow | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Light brown | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Light blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Light Purple | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — White | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Grey | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Teal Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Light Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Black (no color) | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 850 λ — Pink | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Red | 4 | 1 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Dark Red | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Orange | 7 | 2 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Yellow | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Light brown | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Light blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Light Purple | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — White | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Grey | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Teal Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Light Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Black (no color) | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 900 λ — Pink | 2 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Red | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Dark Red | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Orange | 4 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Yellow | 2 | 2 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Light brown | 5 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Light blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Light Purple | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — White | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Grey | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Teal Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Light Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Black (no color) | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 950 λ — Pink | 1 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Red | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Dark Red | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Orange | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Yellow | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Light brown | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Light blue | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Light Purple | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — White | 1 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Grey | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Teal Green | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Light Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Black (no color) | 10 | 5 |
| Color perception at 1000 λ — Pink | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Red | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Dark Red | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Orange | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Yellow | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Light brown | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Light blue | 2 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Light Purple | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — White | 3 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Grey | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Teal Green | 2 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Light Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Black (no color) | 8 | 5 |
| Color perception at 1050 λ — Pink | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Red | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Dark Red | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Orange | 2 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Yellow | 5 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Light brown | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Light blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Light Purple | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — White | 3 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Grey | 2 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Teal Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Light Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Black (no color) | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1100 λ — Pink | 1 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Red | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Dark Red | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Orange | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Yellow | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Light brown | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Light blue | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Blue | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Light Purple | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — White | 6 | 2 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Grey | 2 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Teal Green | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Light Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Black (no color) | 2 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1150 λ — Pink | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Red | 1 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Dark Red | 4 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Orange | 5 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Yellow | 1 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Light brown | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Light blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Blue | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Light Purple | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — White | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Grey | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Teal Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Light Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Black (no color) | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1200 λ — Pink | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Red | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Dark Red | 4 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Orange | 6 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Yellow | 1 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Light brown | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Light blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Blue | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Light Purple | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — White | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Grey | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Teal Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Light Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Black (no color) | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1250 λ — Pink | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Red | 11 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Dark Red | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Orange | 1 | 2 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Yellow | 0 | 2 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Light brown | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Light blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Light Purple | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — White | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Grey | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Teal Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Green | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Light Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Black (no color) | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1300 λ — Pink | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Red | 10 | 2 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Dark Red | 3 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Orange | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Yellow | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Light brown | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Light blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Light Purple | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — White | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Grey | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Teal Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Green | 0 | 2 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Light Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Black (no color) | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1350 λ — Pink | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Red | 6 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Dark Red | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Orange | 6 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Yellow | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Light brown | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Light blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Blue | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Light Purple | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — White | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Grey | 0 | 1 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Teal Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Green | 0 | 2 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Light Green | 0 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Black (no color) | 1 | 0 |
| Color perception at 1400 λ — Pink | 1 | 0 |
Collected over The study started on 9/2015 and was completed on 8/2016, during which time the adverse event data was monitored. Each participant was assessed during their participation in the study for up to two hours.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Response to IR | 0/21 (0%) | 0/21 (0%) | 0/21 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Visual Response to IR in Colorvision Eyes | Visual Response to IR in Colorblind Eyes | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 15 | 5 | 20 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Visual Response to IR in Colorvision Eyes | Visual Response to IR in Colorblind Eyes | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 37.6 (22 to 58) | 45.7 (27 to 71) | 40 (22 to 71) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Visual Response to IR in Colorvision Eyes | Visual Response to IR in Colorblind Eyes | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Male | 9 | 6 | 15 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Visual Response to IR in Colorvision Eyes | Visual Response to IR in Colorblind Eyes | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 12 | 5 | 17 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Visual Response to IR in Colorvision Eyes | Visual Response to IR in Colorblind Eyes | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Black or African American | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| White | 13 | 5 | 18 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Visual Response to IR in Colorvision Eyes | Visual Response to IR in Colorblind Eyes | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 6 | 21 |
Plan to share: No
The record gives a start of Sep 2015, a primary completion of Aug 2016 and a completion of Aug 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Dec 2024, 8 years 4 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.