CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02909010BIS65Updated Sep 21, 2016

Bispectral Index Monitoring To Guide Sedation In The Critical Care Setting

An interventional study of BIS™ Brain Monitoring System and RASS in Deep Sedation, sponsored by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-21.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2016), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A randomized, control trial to compare the total dose of sedatives use in patients over 65 years admitted to the intensive care unit, guiding sedation by monitoring with BIS® versus monitoring with the exclusive use of sedation scales.

The study will include all patients over 65 years who enter the intensive care unit of the University Hospital of Bellvitge affected with medical or surgical pathology of non neurological etiology who require sedation for more than 24 hours to maintain adaptation to mechanical ventilation.

Read the detailed description

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) usually require use of hypnotics and sedatives to ensure comfort and proper adaptation to mechanical ventilation. An important requirement for an adequate sedation is frequent and proper assessment of its depth. Inadequate sedation can lead to problems of over-sedation, under-sedation and/or delirium in ICU, especially in elderly patients. The main objective od the study is To compare the total dose of sedative use and the rate of over-sedation in patients over 65 years admitted to the ICU, adjusting sedation by monitoring with BIS® versus monitoring with the exclusive use of sedation scales. METHODS. A randomized, clinical trial including patients over 65 years who were admitted to the ICU affected with medical or surgical pathology of non neurological etiology who required sedation for more than 24 hours to maintain adaptation to mechanical ventilation. Patients were randomized into two groups: the intervention group using BIS monitoring to adjust sedation in order to maintain values between 50-60 and; the control group in which sedation was adjusted with the exclusive use of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) to maintain RASS -2. The study was approved by the institution's Research Ethics Committee.

02

Conditions studied

  • Deep Sedation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 65 yers
  • Patients admitted to teintensive care unit of the University Hospital of Bellvitge medical or surgical pathology of neurological etiology
  • Patiens requiring sedation for more than 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than 65 years
  • Patients admitted to the ICU with Neurological condition.
  • Postoperative patients admitted and extubation is expected within 24 hours.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    BIS™ Brain Monitoring System

    BIS monitoring to adjust sedation in order to maintain values between 50-60

    Device: BIS™ Brain Monitoring System

  • Placebo comparator
    RASS Monitorization

    sedation was adjusted with the exclusive useof Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) to maintain RASS -2.

    Other: RASS

Interventions

  • DeviceBIS™ Brain Monitoring System

    The intervention group using BIS monitoring to adjust sedation in order to maintain values between 50-60

  • OtherRASS

    control group in which sedation was adjusted with the exclusive use of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) to maintain RASS -2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Dose of sedation

    Total dose of sedatives administered in the intervention group compared with the control group.

    Time frame: Two years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fraser GL, Riker RR. Sedation and analgesia in the critically ill adult. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Apr;20(2):119-23. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32808255b4. PubMed 17413394 ↗
  • Carrasco G. Instruments for monitoring intensive care unit sedation. Crit Care. 2000;4(4):217-25. doi: 10.1186/cc697. Epub 2000 Jul 13. PubMed 11094504 ↗
  • De Deyne C, Struys M, Decruyenaere J, Creupelandt J, Hoste E, Colardyn F. Use of continuous bispectral EEG monitoring to assess depth of sedation in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 1998 Dec;24(12):1294-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340050765. PubMed 9885883 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02909010
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Responsible party
Sofia Contreras Medina (Intensivist, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2016
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Jun 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2016

Study contacts

Luisa Corral, MD
study director · Barcelona University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion