An interventional study of Cobas h232 (Roche Diagnostics) and Clinical audit and feedback in Heart Failure, sponsored by KU Leuven. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-19.
Sponsored by KU Leuven · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Heart failure (HF) imposes a burden for patients and health economics. Although guidelines exist, they are not implemented as such in the Belgian health care system. General practitioners (GPs) are confronted with the broadest range of HF management. Therefore, a multifaceted intervention will be implemented in Belgian general practice to support GPs in the implementation of evidence-based HF guidelines. This multifaceted intervention will consist of audit and feedback as a method to detect unrecognized HF patients and increase awareness for proactive HF management. Additionally, a NT-proBNP point-of-care test will be offered to every practice to improve detection and adequate diagnosis of HF patients. Furthermore, a specialist HF nurse will assist GPs in education of patients, optimization of treatment and transition of care. The investigators' aim is evaluating the feasibility of the implementation of this multifaceted intervention in general practice and the evolution in predefined quality indicators.
Objectives:
The objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a multifaceted intervention to optimize care for HF patients in Belgian general practice. It is not a primary objective to study the effectiveness of the intervention on the defined outcomes, since follow-up might be too short, however the evolution in quality will be evaluated. Specific research questions are:
Data collection:
Patient level
Outcomes:
All data will be extracted from the EHR of the general practitioner for all patients who satisfy the eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted at baseline and after 6 months. First, at baseline and after 6 months, all patients with a registered diagnosis of HF will be identified in the EMHS. Demographic data can be extracted with an automated search; other data will need to be collected by manual chart review. Additionally, all identified HF patients will be visited by the HF nurse at baseline and after 6 months and will be asked to fill in the MLHF-Q. At this occasion grip strength will be measured in the dominant hand using a JAMAR® Plus digital hand-held dynamometer. Three attempts at maximal squeeze will be recorded.
Process evaluation:
GPs will be asked to fill in a study registration form about the indication and results of their NT-proBNP POC test use and how it influenced their decision-making. The HF nurse will keep a log of all actions. Consequence of these actions will be collected from the patients' medical record. GPs will be asked to take note of the HF nurse advice in the EHR and indicate if it influenced decision-making.
Experiences of GPs and investigators:
The feedback meeting at 6 months will be organized as a focus group in each GP practice to get more insight in the experiences of the participating physicians and investigators. The meetings will be audiotaped and typed out. Any harm as a result of the trial will be explicitly collected and reported.
Practice level
Impact of the intervention on hospitalizations and mortality cannot be studied in this pilot trial, however, in a later stage this would be the outcome in the larger cluster-randomized trial, therefore, the feasibility of collecting data on hospitalizations and mortality will be tested. These outcomes will be measured at practice level in all patients aged 40 years or older, enlisted in one of the participating GP practices. GPs will be asked to register date of death and cause of death in the EHR of all patients who die during the study course. A list of hospitalized patients of each participating GP will be collected in all the surrounding hospitals (ZOL Genk, AZ Vesalius, Jessa Hasselt) and handed over to the GPs. Cause of hospitalization will be deducted from the discharge letter in the EHR by the GP in a standardized manner (trained by principal investigator (PI)). The anonymized data will be handed over to the PI.
Data management:
Data collection and data entries will be done by the PI and an assisting data manager. All patient data will be coded and anonymized. All other authors will have full access to the coded data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and will be able to take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Data analysis:
Descriptive statistics will be provided regarding baseline variables of the HF patients and general practitioners/general practices. Outcomes measured before and after the study intervention will be compared with a chi-squared test. Experiences of participating GPs and investigators will be analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis as method.
Ethics:
Before the study start the investigators will present the participating physicians with an informed consent that outlines the intervention and the purpose of the trial. Additionally, all identified HF patients will be visited by the HF nurse before the start of the study. On that occasion the HF nurse will inform all HF patients about the study outline and purpose and ask informed consent. Furthermore, patients eligible for a NT-proBNP POC test will be informed by their GPs about the study outline and purpose and asked informed consent. However, informed consent cannot be sought for all patients on practice level (hospitalizations/mortality). Therefore, information about the study intervention and purpose of the trial will be presented on a poster in each practice, visible for all patients, who can opt-out if they object to study participation.
5,697 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,219 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 538 is above the median of 72 across 3,733 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.
Browse Heart Failure studies →KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 358 studies on the registry; 62 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Heart failure patients are included if:
Patients can be included during the study if:
Exclusion Criteria:
NT-proBNP point-of-care test
Clinical audit and feedback to detect previously unrecognized HF patients and inform GPs about their current quality of HF care
Assistance by a specialized HF nurse in general practice for education of patients, advice in diagnosis and treatment, transition of care
Evaluation of the use of NT-proBNP POC test
How often do GPs use the POC test, for which indications, influence on decision-making?
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluation of the use of specialized HF nurse assistance
How often and for which indications do GPs use the assistance of the specialized HF nurse?
Time frame: 6 months
Adequacy of HF diagnosis
Number of registered HF patients. Number of registered HF patients referred for echocardiography.
Time frame: 6 months
Adequacy of HF treatment
Number of HFrEF patients treated with RAAS-blockade, B-blockers or MRAs. The number of HFrEF patients treated with RAAS-blockade/B-blockers with a dose higher than starting dose
Time frame: 6 months
Evolution of HF patients' QoL
Evolution in quality of life of HF patients measured with a validated dutch version of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
Time frame: 6 months
Number of hospitalizations (all-cause, cardiovascular, HF-related)
the number of patients that are hospitalized at practice level
Time frame: 6 months
Mortality (all-cause/cardiovascular)
the number of patients that die during study course at practice level
Time frame: 6 months
Adequacy of follow-up
The number of HF patients that consulted their GP in the past 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Adequacy of specialized follow-up
The number of HF patients that were referred to a cardiologist in the past 18 months
Time frame: 6 months
Adequacy of transition of care
The number of patients that contacted a familiar physician (cardiologist, GP, HF nurse) in the first 30 days after hospitalization
Time frame: 6 months
Experiences of GPs with a multifaceted intervention to optimize care
Is a multifaceted intervention to optimize care feasible? How do GPs experience such an intervention?
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
KU Leuven