CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02904915Updated Nov 7, 2018Results posted

Paracervical Block Versus No Paracervical Block During IUD Insertion

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lidocaine and No analgesia in Analgesia and IUD Insertion, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 52 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-07.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 52 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the pain level and level of discomfort with paracervical block versus no analgesia in women who present to the University of Texas (UT) Physicians Obstetrics and Gynecology Continuity Clinic, The UT Physicians Women's Center, and the UT Physicians Women's Center- Bellaire for IUD insertion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Analgesia
  • IUD Insertion
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston is the lead sponsor of 880 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 52 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Women of reproductive age who present for an IUD insertion procedure at the University of Texas Physicians Obstetrics and Gynecology Continuity Clinic, The UT Physicians Women's Center, and the UT Physicians Women's Center- Bellaire for IUD insertion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with current pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)
  • Women who are not good candidates for an IUD
  • Patients who have a Lidocaine allergy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Paracervical block

    Intrauterine device (IUD) placement with paracervical block with 1% lidocaine.

    Drug: Lidocaine · Device: Intrauterine device (IUD)

  • Active comparator
    No analgesia

    IUD placement with no analgesia.

    Other: No analgesia · Device: Intrauterine device (IUD)

Interventions

  • DrugLidocaine

    Intrauterine device (IUD) placement with paracervical block with 1% lidocaine.

    Also known as: xylocaine, lignocaine

  • OtherNo analgesia

    IUD placement without analgesia.

  • DeviceIntrauterine device (IUD)

    IUD placement with or without paracervical block with 1% lidocaine.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The order of overall events are: insertion of speculum, assessment of pain via a visual analogue scale (VAS) (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum), injection of 2cc 1% lidocaine at the tenaculum site of the cervix, placement of tenaculum (about 2-3 minutes after insertion of speculum), assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum), injection of 3cc 1% lidocaine at the 4 and 8 o'clock position of the cervix, insert IUD (about 4-5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum), and assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD). The Faces pain VAS was used, which ranges from 0 (very happy, no hurt) to 10 (hurts as much as you can imagine).

    Time frame: baseline (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum)

  2. Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale

    The order of overall events are: insertion of speculum, assessment of pain via a visual analogue scale (VAS) (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum), injection of 2cc 1% lidocaine at the tenaculum site of the cervix, placement of tenaculum (about 2-3 minutes after insertion of speculum), assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum), injection of 3cc 1% lidocaine at the 4 and 8 o'clock position of the cervix, insert IUD (about 4-5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum), and assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD). The Faces pain VAS was used, which ranges from 0 (very happy, no hurt) to 10 (hurts as much as you can imagine).

    Time frame: about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum (tenaculum inserted about 2 to 3 minutes after insertion of speculum)

  3. Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale

    The order of overall events are: insertion of speculum, assessment of pain via a visual analogue scale (VAS) (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum), injection of 2cc 1% lidocaine at the tenaculum site of the cervix, placement of tenaculum (about 2-3 minutes after insertion of speculum), assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum), injection of 3cc 1% lidocaine at the 4 and 8 o'clock position of the cervix, insert IUD (about 4-5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum), and assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD). The Faces pain VAS was used, which ranges from 0 (very happy, no hurt) to 10 (hurts as much as you can imagine).

    Time frame: about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD (IUD inserted about 4 to 5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum)

07

Results

Posted Nov 7, 2018
Limitations and caveats
No Sham Block. Subjects had more variability in baseline pain scores (taken after speculum placement but prior to any procedure) than anticipated, and thus the study was underpowered.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParacervical BlockNo Analgesia
Started2525
Completed2525
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

The order of overall events are: insertion of speculum, assessment of pain via a visual analogue scale (VAS) (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum), injection of 2cc 1% lidocaine at the tenaculum site of the cervix, placement of tenaculum (about 2-3 minutes after insertion of speculum), assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum), injection of 3cc 1% lidocaine at the 4 and 8 o'clock position of the cervix, insert IUD (about 4-5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum), and assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD). The Faces pain VAS was used, which ranges from 0 (very happy, no hurt) to 10 (hurts as much as you can imagine).

Time frame:
baseline (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
units on a scaleParacervical BlockNo Analgesia
Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)2.4 ± 2.32.1 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Paracervical Block vs No Analgesia · Fisher Exact · p = 0.59
PrimaryPain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale

The order of overall events are: insertion of speculum, assessment of pain via a visual analogue scale (VAS) (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum), injection of 2cc 1% lidocaine at the tenaculum site of the cervix, placement of tenaculum (about 2-3 minutes after insertion of speculum), assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum), injection of 3cc 1% lidocaine at the 4 and 8 o'clock position of the cervix, insert IUD (about 4-5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum), and assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD). The Faces pain VAS was used, which ranges from 0 (very happy, no hurt) to 10 (hurts as much as you can imagine).

Time frame:
about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum (tenaculum inserted about 2 to 3 minutes after insertion of speculum)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
units on a scaleParacervical BlockNo Analgesia
Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale2.1 ± 2.52.7 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Paracervical Block vs No Analgesia · Fisher Exact · p = 0.39
PrimaryPain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale

The order of overall events are: insertion of speculum, assessment of pain via a visual analogue scale (VAS) (about 30 seconds after insertion of the speculum), injection of 2cc 1% lidocaine at the tenaculum site of the cervix, placement of tenaculum (about 2-3 minutes after insertion of speculum), assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the tenaculum), injection of 3cc 1% lidocaine at the 4 and 8 o'clock position of the cervix, insert IUD (about 4-5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum), and assessment of pain via VAS (about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD). The Faces pain VAS was used, which ranges from 0 (very happy, no hurt) to 10 (hurts as much as you can imagine).

Time frame:
about 30 seconds after insertion of the IUD (IUD inserted about 4 to 5 minutes after insertion of tenaculum)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
units on a scaleParacervical BlockNo Analgesia
Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale2.6 ± 2.73.6 ± 2.9
Statistical analysis
  • Paracervical Block vs No Analgesia · Fisher Exact · p = 0.23

Adverse events

Collected over From time of speculum placement until the patient left the office (patient leaves office about 3-5 minutes after the procedure, for a total of about 15 minutes from speculum placement to leaving the office).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Paracervical Block0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
No Analgesia0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Paracervical BlockNo AnalgesiaTotal
Mean24.6 ± 4.626.6 ± 5.925.6 ± 5.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Paracervical BlockNo AnalgesiaTotal
Female252550
Male000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Paracervical BlockNo AnalgesiaTotal
African American121426
Caucasian336
Hispanic7714
Asian101
Unknown213
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Paracervical BlockNo AnalgesiaTotal
United States252550
Prior delivery type
Prior delivery type(Participants)Paracervical BlockNo AnalgesiaTotal
Cesarean Section7411
Vaginal152136
None303
Contraception History
Contraception History(Participants)Paracervical BlockNo AnalgesiaTotal
Oral contraceptive pill628
Intrauterine device (IUD)156
Nexplanon/injectables101
Depo Provera/injections7310
Condoms (female and male)325
Nuvaring167
None347
Unknown336
History of Infection
History of Infection(Participants)Paracervical BlockNo AnalgesiaTotal
Chlamydia022
Bacterial vaginosis (BV)81321
Yeast437
Human papillomavirus (HPV)6410
None7310
Take pain medication
Take pain medication(Participants)Paracervical BlockNo AnalgesiaTotal
Count of participants224
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 4, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02904915
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Responsible party
Pamela Berens (Professor, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2016
Start date
Jan 12, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 9, 2017
Completion
Oct 9, 2017
Results posted
Nov 7, 2018
Last update
Nov 7, 2018

Study contacts

Pamela D Berens, MD
principal investigator · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion