CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02898064MAPPUpdated Jul 5, 2019

Back Pain Prevention in Multiple Myeloma Using an External Spinal Brace

An interventional study of thoracolumbosacral orthosis or cervicothoracolumbar orthosis and Standard care in Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-05.

Sponsored by University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Consenting patients with multiple myeloma (MM) will be randomly allocated to receive either standard medical treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, pain-killing medication) alone or standard medical treatment plus a brace. Patients will be regularly evaluated in research clinics; the results data will inform the design of a full trial. Information will be collected to inform a list of requirements a centre needs to have in place to run an RCT of these interventions.

Read the detailed description

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplasia of plasma cells mostly within the bone marrow, commonly leading to multiple vertebral collapses. This causes spinal deformity, leading to incapacitating back pain and reduced quality of life. In spite of advances in medical therapy, some patients are left with disabling back pain, sometimes requiring surgical intervention. University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust have observed on an audit of our own practice that application of an external spinal brace as early in the disease process as is possible appears to maintain the overall alignment of the spine, thus minimising risk of spinal deformity and consequent back pain.

The ultimate aim is to undertake an RCT to determine whether the use of an external spinal brace can reduce back pain and spine-related disability in patients suffering from back pain due to multiple myeloma, in comparison to conventional management without a brace.

However, prior to this, a feasibility study is required. The feasibility study is needed to see if the trial processes (providing patient information, consent process, conducting the baseline investigations and outcome measures) can be accommodated without causing too much delay to the application of the brace.

Suitable patients will be consented by the research team and randomised to receive a brace or no brace in addition to their routine Myeloma treatment. After baseline data collection and questionnaires, the participant would be followed up for data collection at 6 weeks and 3 months.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2 is below the median of 41 across 2,907 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults with MM
  • Myeloma infiltration in the spine confirmed by radiological evidence
  • MM-related back pain
  • Can attend for the whole follow up period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presenting with cord compression and neurological deficit requiring urgent decompression and intervention
  • Chronic pain syndrome
  • Language barrier that cannot be overcome using translation services
  • Unwilling or unable to give informed consent
  • Painful VCFs at the lumbosacral junction, L4 to Sacrum, where application of brace is not possible.

Not suitable for treatment with a brace e.g. pregnancy

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Standard care + brace

    Spinal brace (thoracolumbosacral orthosis or cervico-thoraco-lumbar orthosis) to be fitted to the participant in addition to receiving standard of care treatment which can include radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery including vertebral augmentation and also medication including bisphosphonates

    Device: thoracolumbosacral orthosis or cervicothoracolumbar orthosis · Other: Standard care

  • Other
    Standard care

    Participant will receive standard of care treatment which can include radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery including vertebral augmentation and also medication including bisphosphonates

    Other: Standard care

Interventions

  • Devicethoracolumbosacral orthosis or cervicothoracolumbar orthosis

    An "off the shelf spinal brace" which will be applied to the patients trunk. They will have straps and harnesses which the patient can fasten and remove if needed. The brace will need to be worn by the intervention group all the time for 3 months except when lying in bed. In the presence of lower thoracic (T8 downwards), thoraco-lumbar and lumbar (L1- L3) fractures, a thoracolumbosacral orthosis will be applied. For upper thoracic fractures (T1-T7) a cervico-thoracic or cervico-thoraco-lumbar orthosis will be used.

    Also known as: spinal brace

  • OtherStandard care

    Standard surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, drug therapy as applicable and decided by the participants consultant as part of standard care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time from diagnosis to brace fitting for patients randomised to the intervention group

    Time frame: Assessed at 3 months

  2. Number of patients in the intervention arm who request additional support from the orthotic team and time they had to wait for support.

    Time frame: assessed at the end of study at 21 months

  3. The number of orthotists in each hospital

    Time frame: 21 months

  4. Are appropriate braces fitted

    The locations and levels of VCFs and back pain in patients and the type of brace fitted will be recorded to determine whether appropriate braces are fitted.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. Number of appointments issued by orthotists

    Time frame: 21 months

  6. Frequency of appointments issued by orthotists

    Time frame: 21 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The number of new MM cases at each centre

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. The number of eligible patients who give consent to enter the study

    Time frame: 21 months

  3. The number of patients that drop-out during follow-up and their reasons

    Time frame: 21 months

  4. The number of missing cases for a subsequent RCTs co-primary outcomes of pain and disability

    Time frame: 21 months

  5. Pain measured by VAS

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 3 months

  6. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis of the 3-month follow up patient questionnaire

    The questionnaire consists principally of ordinal rating scales, which will be analysed descriptively in terms of frequencies, medians and interquartile ranges. Qualitative data from the supplementary open-ended questions will be analysed by means of framework analysis.

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Qualitative assessment of semi structured interviews in a sub-set of participants, EQ-5D-5L

    Time frame: 21 months

  8. The number of patients who receive non-study-related interventions during the 3 month follow-up period

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Disability measured by ODI

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 3 months

  10. Number of patients eligible for the study during 1 recruitment year.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
    Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 6QG, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Only anonymised patient data would be published

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 5, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02898064
Lead sponsor
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2016
Start date
Dec 19, 2016
Primary completion
May 31, 2018
Completion
May 31, 2018
Last update
Jul 5, 2019

Study contacts

Sandeep Konduru
study director · University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion