ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02898051aXaUpdated Oct 19, 2017

Anti Xa Activity in Cancer Patients Receiving Low-molecular-weight Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism

An observational study in Neoplasms and Venous Thromboembolism, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Status unknown at 8 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-19.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2017), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
370
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are the reference molecule for the long term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients but remains, however, associated with a high risk of recurrent thromboembolism. The high rate of recurrence may result from alterations in the pharmacokinetics of LMWH. The primary purpose of the study is to compare the pharmacokinetics of anti-Xa activity in patients with cancer and patients without cancer treated with curative dose of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The secondary purposes are 1/ to study the correlation between anti-Xa LMWH and concentration of plasma heparanase and 2/ to evaluate the predictive nature of the anti-Xa activity on the occurrence of thromboembolic recurrence in cancer patients treated with LMWH for VTE.

Read the detailed description

Purpose of the study:

The primary purpose of the study is to compare the pharmacokinetics of anti-Xa activity in patients with cancer and patients without cancer treated with curative dose of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE).

The secondary purposes are 1/ to study the correlation between anti-Xa LMWH and concentration of plasma heparanase and 2/ to evaluate the predictive nature of the anti-Xa activity on the occurrence of thromboembolic recurrence in cancer patients treated with LMWH for VTE.

Study design:

Multicentre cohort study of patients hospitalized with VTE:

  1. Observational case-control study to compare the pharmacodynamics of anti-Xa activity between patients cancer patients (n = 50) and non-cancer patients (n = 50) matched (1-1) for age, renal function and LMWH
  2. A prospective cohort study including 320 cancer patients with a 6 months follow-up.

Study hypothesis:

Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are a common complication of cancer. They complicate up to 10% of cancers and are the cause of fatality, morbidity and significant impaired quality of life. The treatment of these diseases is difficult in this context. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are the reference molecule for the long term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. Outside this context, their pharmacological properties allow to administer a fixed dose without measuring anti-Xa activity. In the presence of cancer, their use remains, however, associated with a high risk of recurrent thromboembolism up to 9% after 6 months of treatment.

This high rate of recurrence may result from alterations in the pharmacokinetics of LMWH in the presence of a cancer. The synthesis of heparanase by tumor cells might cause a decrease in anti-Xa activity of LMWH and reduce their effectiveness. If this hypothesis is verified, it could result in a change in the management of thrombosis in cancer patients and lead to a dose adjustment of LMWH through the measurement of anti-Xa activity, which may allow reduce the incidence of thromboembolic relapses during treatment.

Enrollment (Target or Actual Number of Subjects):

  1. Pharmacokinetics study In a preliminary unpublished study of 37 cancer and non-cancer subjects with the highest concentration of anti-Xa activity was measured. Included 100 subjects (50 cancer patients and 50 non-cancer) would detect a maximum level difference of anti-Xa activity in plasma of 0.20 between cancer patients and cancer-with a power of 90% and a risk of the first kind 5%.

    A difference of 0.20 seems relevant from these preliminary data (median 0.46 vs 0.65), and returns to show that a cancer patient has over 70% chance of having a maximum concentration of anti-Xa activity below that of a free cancer patient (nonparametric Wilcoxon test).

  2. Cohort study (cancer patients) The risk of recurrent thromboembolism was estimated between 5 and 10% in cancer patients. By including 200 subjects, around twenty events would be observed and corresponds to a reasonable number of subjects can be recruited over 18 months (50 would already enroll in the pharmacodynamic study). The event rate will be assessed on the first 100 patients that will have been followed for 6 months, if event rate is lower than expected, the number of participants will be reassessed.

After over 2 years of inclusion, the event rate is lower than expected (7%). The number of subjects required was therefore reassessed. To reach the number of 20 events necessary to our analysis, a total of 320 cancer subjects must therefore be included.

Target Follow-Up, duration :

Study duration: 5 years and 6 months (inclusion: 5 years follow-up: 6 months). Duration of participation: 3 a 10 days for non-cancer patients, 6 months for cancer patient.

Performance of the study:

  1. Pharmacokinetics study Inclusion (as soon as the diagnosis is confirmed VTE): 1 tube of blood taken before the start of treatment (at the time of another blood sample) for determination of heparanase. After the start of treatment: 3 tubes of blood drawn for determination of anti-Xa activity.

    Assays will be centrally performed, blinded from the clinical data and from the group knowledge of the group patient.

  2. Prospective cohort study of cancer patients Followed for 6 months with consultation at 1, 3, and 6 months (normal monitoring).

Follow-up visits: Collection of clinical data (recurrent thromboembolism, hemorrhage, death, tumor progression, cancer treatment since last visit, interruption of treatment with LMWH, thrombocytopenia, anemia), and removal of 1 tube of blood (at the time of a another sample) for determination of anti-Xa activity.

Thromboembolic recurrences will be validated centrally by an independent committee.

Prospects:

Reduce the incidence of thromboembolic recurrence in cancer patients treated with LMWH for VTE by adapting the dose of LMWH with anti-Xa activity in this population if the hypothesis is verified.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neoplasms
  • Venous Thromboembolism

Keywords

  • heparin low-molecular-weight;pharmacokinetics
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,610 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,508 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 370 is above the median of 202 across 1,742 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,576 studies on the registry; 1,028 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Hospitalized patients in tertiary care hospitals participating to the study and treated with curative dose of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Case:

  • Being affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Having an active solid or hematological cancer (myeloma or lymphoma), histologically or cytologically confirmed, for which the active state will be defined by the existence of a tumoral active disease or an incomplete tumoral resection or the persistence of high tumor markers after complete resection of the tumor.
  • The venous thromboembolism disease has to be:
  • A deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity (proximal or distal) confirmed by the lack of compressibility of a venous segment under the ultrasound probe or the presence of a venous gap in CT venography or phlebography;
  • or a thrombosis of the vena cava or the iliac vein confirmed by an abdominal CT scan with contrast or a venous ultrasound or an ilio-cavography;
  • or a pulmonary embolism confirmed according to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology : through a gap in a pulmonary artery, at least segmental or multiple gaps sub-segmental on spiral CT angiography of the pulmonary arteries or by a high appearance probability on a lung radionuclide imaging, or by clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism accompanying symptomatic proximal vein thrombosis confirmed by a venous ultrasound or by an unexplained echocardiography acute pulmonary heart in presence of a high clinical probability and for patients who are unfit for transport and with cardiogenic shock
  • The venous thromboembolism disease can be asymptomatic or incidentally discovered but is confirmed objectively.
  • No cons-indication to low molecular weight heparin treatment at therapeutic dose.
  • Prescription in the last 72 hours of a low molecular weight heparin treatment or fondaparinux at therapeutic dose.

Control:

  • Being affiliated to a social security scheme.
  • Being free from malignant tumor pathology detectable at the time of inclusion.
  • Being afflicted with venous thromboembolism defined by the same criteria of cancer subjects.
  • The venous thromboembolism disease can be asymptomatic or incidentally discovered but is confirmed objectively.
  • No cons-indication to low molecular weight heparin treatment at therapeutic dose.
  • Prescription in the last 72 hours of a low molecular weight heparin treatment or fondaparinux at therapeutic dose.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Case:

  • Visceral vein thrombosis of the upper limb or venous thrombosis of the superior vena cava system because their scalability under treatment, including the risk of embolic recurrence is less known that pulmonary embolism and thrombosis of the lower limbs and their diagnostic modalities are less formalized.
  • Tumor disease not confirmed histologically or cytologically.
  • Follow-up after complete tumor resection without elevated tumor markers.
  • Cons-indication to low molecular weight heparin treatment at therapeutic dose.
  • Initial treatment with another anticoagulant molecule than LMWH or fondaparinux (thrombin inhibitor, direct factor Xa inhibitors)
  • Severe renal impairment defined by a creatinine clearance below than 30 ml / min at baseline.
  • Known pregnancy or lack of effective contraception for women of childbearing age or breastfeeding.
  • Patient previously included in the study.
  • Impossible follow-up.
  • Life expectancy less than 6 months.
  • Patient whose weight is greater than 100 Kg.

Control:

  • Not yet confirmed suspected malignant tumor pathology associated with the venous thromboembolism disease.
  • Active cancer in the last 2 years.
  • Cons-indication to low molecular weight heparin treatment at therapeutic dose.
  • Initial treatment with another anticoagulant molecule than LMWH or fondaparinux (thrombin inhibitor, direct factor Xa inhibitors)
  • Severe renal impairment defined by a creatinine clearance below than 30 ml / min at baseline.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
370 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Venous Thromboembolism and cancer

    Patients hospitalized for Venous Thromboembolism and having a cancer. Inclusion (as soon as the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism is confirmed). One tube of blood taken before the start of treatment (at the time of another blood sample) for determination of heparanase. After the start of treatment: three tubes of blood drawn for determination of anti-Xa activity. Assays will be centrally performed, blinded from the clinical data and from the group knowledge of the group patient.

  • Venous Thromboembolism and non cancer

    Patients hospitalized for Venous Thromboembolism and not having a cancer. Inclusion (as soon as the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism is confirmed). One tube of blood taken before the start of treatment (at the time of another blood sample) for determination of heparanase. After the start of treatment: 3 tubes of blood drawn for determination of anti-Xa activity. Assays will be centrally performed, blinded from the clinical data and from the group knowledge of the group patient.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. anti-Xa activity

    The measurement of anti-Xa activity will be performed four times during the initial treatment for each patient (or during the first 5 to 10 days of treatment) and will establish pharmacokinetic modeling (population type approach, nonlinear model mixed-effect) of the low molecular weight heparin therapy in subjects with cancer or not. In order to obtain a curve of relevant anti-Xa activity.

    Time frame: 10 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. hemorrhage

    Major hemorrhage: * hemorrhage at the origin of death; * symptomatic hemorrhage in a major organ such as intracranial hemorrhage, intra spinal, intraocular, retro peritoneal, intra-articular, pericardial and muscle bleeding causing a compartment syndrome * symptomatic hemorrhage causing a fall in hemoglobin of at least 2 g / dL or leading to a transfusion of at least two blood units. Other hemorrhage will be considered as non-major.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. all cause mortality

    Cause and date of death. The death will be classified as follows: * related to cancer; * secondary to bleeding; * secondary to a confirmed pulmonary embolism; * other cause; * unexplained sudden death that can be attributed to pulmonary embolism.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. thromboembolic recurrences

    All thromboembolic events diagnosed during the follow-up period will be considered in the analysis, whether symptomatic or discovered incidentally on radiographic examination for another reason, evaluation of tumor progression in particular. The recurrence of venous thrombosis should be confirmed objectively by the presence of a non-compressible venous segment in an initially compressible area or by the appearance of a new gap in the CT venography. The recurrence of pulmonary embolism must be confirmed by the appearance of a gap in a normal artery on the initial scanner or the more proximal extension of thrombosis on the 2nd scanner or the appearance of a segmental perfusion defect without abnormality of ventilation in an initially normal part on the initial scintigraphy or the initial scan.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Hôpital d'instruction des armees Desgenettes
    Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 69003, France
  • CHU de Saint-Etienne Hôpital Nord
    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 42270, France
  • CHU de Dijon
    Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 21079, France
  • Hôpital La Cavale Blanche
    Brest, Brittany Region 29609, France
  • CHU Amiens - Hôpital Sud
    Amiens, Picardie 80054, France
  • Hôpital Louis Mourier
    Colombes, Île-de-France Region 92700, France
  • Hôpital Saint-Louis
    Paris, Île-de-France Region 75010, France
  • Hôpital Europeen Georges Pompidou
    Paris, Île-de-France Region 75015, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chew HK, Wun T, Harvey D, Zhou H, White RH. Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its effect on survival among patients with common cancers. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 27;166(4):458-64. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.4.458. PubMed 16505267 ↗
  • Khorana AA, Streiff MB, Farge D, Mandala M, Debourdeau P, Cajfinger F, Marty M, Falanga A, Lyman GH. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in cancer: a consensus statement of major guidelines panels and call to action. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 10;27(29):4919-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3214. Epub 2009 Aug 31. PubMed 19720907 ↗
  • Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G, Goldhaber S, Raskob GE, Comerota AJ. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):454S-545S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0658. PubMed 18574272 ↗
  • Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI, Bowden C, Kakkar AK, Prins M, Rickles FR, Julian JA, Haley S, Kovacs MJ, Gent M; Randomized Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer (CLOT) Investigators. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 10;349(2):146-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025313. PubMed 12853587 ↗
  • Katz BZ, Muhl L, Zwang E, Ilan N, Herishanu Y, Deutsch V, Naparstek E, Vlodavsky I, Preissner KT. Heparanase modulates heparinoids anticoagulant activities via non-enzymatic mechanisms. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Dec;98(6):1193-9. PubMed 18064313 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 19, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02898051
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, France, National Cancer Institute, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2016
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Oct 2017
Completion
Jan 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 19, 2017

Study contacts

Guy Meyer, MD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion