ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT02896348Updated May 6, 2026

Assessment of a Physio-neuro Platform (SynPhNe) for Home-based Retraining of Hand Function in Stroke Survivors

An interventional study of SynPhNe platform and Conventional therapy in Stroke and Hemiparesis, sponsored by Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-06.

Sponsored by Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to:

  1. Assess the usability of the SynPhNe device in a home environment.
  2. Evaluate the efficacy of the SynPhNe home use device to improve motor hand function in chronic stroke subjects as compared to standard care alone.
Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to explore if the SynPhNe system can be used easily at home for people who suffered a stroke. With this study, we are also investigating if the SynPhNe system used could improve your hand function in comparison to conventional therapy.

SynPhNe is a non-invasive device. It consists of a piece worn around the forearm, a head component and it communicates wirelessly via Bluetooth with the computer to provide subject with feedback while performing motor tasks with their hand. The head cap records your brain activity and gives feedback to help relaxing while exercising.

The SynPhNe system has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Study participants will be randomized by chance (like a coin toss) to one of the two groups: lab-based upper extremity research therapy or the SynPhNe system for home-based exercises.

  • The lab-based upper-extremity research therapy in its content is similar to regular occupational therapy and will focus exercise movements of arm and hand.
  • The group testing the SynPhNe system at home will have the system lent at no cost.

The study lasts for up to 12 weeks and involves up to 22 sessions in total:

  • Up to 3 sessions will be for testing arm movements (at baseline, after research therapy and at 1 month follow-up).
  • 18 research therapy sessions. 10 of them will be done at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital with a therapist and 8 of them by yourself, at home. Study participants will either be using the SynPhNe system or the therapy plan recommended by the therapist, depending on the randomization. Each of these visits will be an hour long. They will be scheduled 3 days per week for six weeks.
02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Hemiparesis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hemiparesis
  • Stroke
  • Rehabilitation
  • Home-based
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital is the lead sponsor of 117 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Of its 20 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (85%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least 6 months prior study enrollment ;
  • Moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis (initial score on the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment between 21 and 55 out of 66) ;
  • Ability to extend at least 2 fingers in the affected hand 10 degrees at any joint with pain-free passive range of motion at least 50% in all joints below the elbow.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment resulting to inability to follow instructions (as assessed with the ) and inability to sustain attention for more than 10 minutes;
  • Current participation in upper-extremity therapy program;
  • Treatment with Botox injections in the affected arm in the previous 3 months and no planned Botox injections before the end of the study;
  • Aphasia sufficient to limit comprehension and completion of the treatment protocol;
  • No more than moderate impairments in paretic UE sensation, passive range of motion, and pain that would limit ability to engage in therapy;
  • Increased muscle tone as indicated by score of >/= 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale;
  • Previous diagnosis of dementia;
  • Previous diagnosis of neurological diseases other than Stroke;
  • History of seizures disorder and/or a seizure occuring within the last 6 months;
  • Other conditions affecting function of the stroke affected upper limb;
  • Severe pain in the stroke affected upper limb;
  • Terminal diseases with expected survival \<1 year;
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SynPhNe therapy

    Subjects will be asked to participate in a program of 18 upper-extremity rehabilitation sessions of 60 minutes with SynPhNe platform, over 6 weeks. The sessions will emphasize wrist and fingers movements, including functional activities. During week the two first weeks, 6 sessions will be done under therapist supervision at the Motion Analysis Laboratory at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital. Over the next 4 to 5 weeks, 10 sessions following exercises prompted by the SynPhNe system will be done unsupervised at home (or under limited supervision at the hospital), 2 sessions will be done at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital to review exercises with the SynPhNe system. Over the course of the study, participants will wear Axivity sensors to gather information about upper-extremity usage.

    Device: SynPhNe platform

  • Active comparator
    Conventional therapy

    Subjects will be asked to participate in a program of 18 upper-extremity rehabilitation sessions of 60 minutes under therapist supervision over two weeks at the Motion Analysis Laboratory at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital. The sessions will emphasize wrist and fingers movements, including functional activities. During week the two first weeks, 6 sessions will be done under therapist supervision at the Motion Analysis Laboratory at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital. The remaining 10 sessions will be done unsupervised at home, over approximately 4 weeks, and following the therapist home treatment plan. Over that time, 2 visits to Spaulding Rehabilitation will be made to review home treatment plan. Over the course of the study, participants will wear Axivity sensors to gather information about upper-extremity usage.

    Other: Conventional therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceSynPhNe platform

    SynPhNe is a non-invasive device. It consists of a piece worn around the forearm, a head component and it communicates wirelessly with the computer to provide feedback while performing motor tasks with the hemiparetic hand. The head cap records brain activity and gives feedback to help relaxing while exercising. The arm and the head component communicate wirelessly with the computer via Bluetooth. The head component reads brain signals while the arm gear senses your muscle signals when performing the exercises. The computer software adopts the appropriate difficulty level, speed and duration of the exercise depending on brain and muscle status to minimize fatigue.

  • OtherConventional therapy

    Exercise program established with a therapist (8 sessions under therapist direct supervision and 10 sessions at home). Low functioning subjects will be given more proximal joint-muscle exercises and activities while higher functioning subjects will have a greater component of distal tasks and activities. The therapist will review the exercises therapy plan with the subject and re-adjust it.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity - Motor

    This is a motor function assessment for stroke survivors who have hemiplegia. Items are scored on a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially, and 2=performs fully. Higher scores are indicative of higher function. Maximum score=66.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  2. Box and Block Test

    The test is an assessment of unilateral gross manual dexterity. It is performed with each hand separately, the stroke-affected hand and the non-affected hand. The scored is calculated by counting the number of blocks that were carried over the partition from one side of the box to the other side of the box in 1 minute. Higher scores are indicative of better gross manual dexterity.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  3. Wolf Motor Function Test - Functional Ablility

    This assessment evaluates motor ability of the upper extremity during timed and functional tasks. Functional ability scores are assigned using a 6-point ordinal scale, and the maximum score is 75. A score of 0=does not attempt with the involved arm and a score of 5=arm does participate; movement appears to be normal. Higher scores are indicative of higher function.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  4. Wolf Motor Function Test - Performance Time

    This assessment evaluates motor ability of the upper extremity during timed and functional tasks. Performance time is measured in seconds, with up to 120 seconds allowed.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

Secondary outcomes

  1. Grip Strength

    This is a measurement of maximal isometric hand grip strength in kilograms. A Jamar dynamometer will be utilized.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  2. Visual Analogue Scale for Pain

    This is an assessment of pain intensity from 0=no pain to 10=worse pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  3. Spasticity -- Modified Ashworth Scale

    The upper extremity will be assessed for spasticity. Scores will be assigned based on the Modified Ashworth Scale. Scores range from from 0=no spasticity/ no increase in muscle tone) to 4=affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  4. Motor Activity Log - Amount of Use

    This outcome measure assesses upper extremity function and use through patient report. Items are scored using a 6-point ordinal scale. For the Amount Scale, 0=the weaker arm was not used at all for that activity (not used), while 5=the weaker arm was used as often as before the stroke (same as pre-stroke). The score is calculated by adding the rating scores for each item and dividing by the number of items asked.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  5. EQ5D Questionnaire

    This is a health questionnaire that evaluates quality of life in 5 dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depressions. Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, the EQ-5D health questionnaire provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. Answers are coded as a number where 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=unable or extreme problems. An index score is calculated and ranges from 0=a state as bad as being dead to 1=full health.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  6. Motor Activity Log - Quality of Movement

    This outcome measure assesses upper extremity function and use through patient report. Items are scored using a 6-point ordinal scale. For the How Well Scale, 0=the weaker arm was not used at all for that activity (not used), while 5=the ability to use the weaker arm for that activity was as good as before the stroke (normal). The score is calculated by adding the rating scores for each item and dividing by the number of items asked.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

Other outcomes

  1. Range of Motion -- Upper Extremity

    Upper-extremity range of motion is assessed utilizing a goniometer.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  2. Manual Muscle Testing

    This is an assessment of muscle strength. Scores will be assigned according to the Kendall Muscle Strength Grading System. Scores range from 0 (no contraction felt or seen) to 5 (holds test position against strong pressure).

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  3. Device Satisfaction Feedback Questionnaire (only for intervention group)

    This questionnaire gathers satisfaction feedback about the usage of the device. Questions are scored from 1 to 5, with a total score up to 25. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with the device.

    Time frame: Week 7

  4. Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Blood pressure measurement is collected on the non-affected upper limb. Units are mmHg.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 7, Week 11

  5. Number of Sessions Completed (only for intervention group)

    This is a log of completed sessions recorded by the software. Higher numbers indicates better adherence to the intervention.

    Time frame: Week 7

  6. Number of Issues Encountered with the Device and/or Software (only for intervention group)

    This is a recording of the number of occurrences of device and/or software malfunction.

    Time frame: Week 7

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02129, United States
    Recruiting
    • Kathy Piela, PT, DPT · Contactkpiela@mgb.org · 617-952-6388
    • Motion Analysis Laboratory · Contact617-952-6331
    • Paolo Bonato, PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 22 months after the start.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 22 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 18, 2016
First posted
Sep 12, 2016
StartActual
Feb 26, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 2027
Last update
May 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02896348
Responsible party
Paolo Bonato (PhD, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 12, 2016
Start date
Feb 26, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 6, 2026

Study contacts

Kathy Piela, PT, DPT
Contact
kpiela@mgb.org
6179526388
Motion Analysis Laboratory
Contact
6179526331
Paolo Bonato, PhD
principal investigator · Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion