ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02889887Updated Sep 7, 2016

Relationship Between Sensory Processing and Motor Development

An observational study in Sensation Disorders, sponsored by Gazi University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 10 Months to 12 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-07.

Sponsored by Gazi University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2016), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
10 Months to 12 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to analyse correlation between the sensory processing and motor development in preterm infants.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to analyse correlation between the sensory processing and motor development in preterm infants. A total of 60 infants who were born preterm (n=30) and term (n=30), the corrected and chronological ages between 10-12 months, were included in this study. Test of Sensory Function in Infants was used to evaluate sensory processing, and Alberta Infant Motor Scale was used to evaluate motor development.Spearman correlation test indicated strong positive relation between sensory processing and motor development in preterm infants. Given the relationship between sensory processing and motor development in preterm group, for effective implementation of physiotherapy assessments and interventions, it was thought that it is necessary to evaluate the sensory processing as well as the motor development in preterm infants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sensation Disorders

Keywords

  • Preterm
  • Sensory Processing
  • Motor Development
03

In context

Sensation Disorders

75 studies on the registry are indexed under Sensation Disorders; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 58 across 23 observational studies indexed under Sensation Disorders.

Browse Sensation Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Gazi University is the lead sponsor of 548 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Months to 12 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

A total of 60 infants who were born preterm (n=30) and term (n=30), the corrected and chronological ages between 10-12 months, were included in this study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • gestational age lower than 37 month
  • corrected age within 10-12 months
  • without congenital anomaly or systemic disease
  • stay in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at least 2 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • taken physiotherapy or sensory integration therapy in any rehabilitation center
  • having newborn retinopathy
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • preterm

    infants who born before 37 completed weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The investigation of sensory processing in preterm infants

    Test of Sensory Function in Infants' was used to evaluate sensory processing in preterm infants.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. The investigation of motor development in preterm infants

    Alberta Infant Motor Scale' was used to evaluate motor development in preterm infants.

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Celik HI, Elbasan B, Gucuyener K, Kayihan H, Huri M. Investigation of the Relationship Between Sensory Processing and Motor Development in Preterm Infants. Am J Occup Ther. 2018 Jan/Feb;72(1):7201195020p1-7201195020p7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2018.026260. PubMed 29280716 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2016, a primary completion of Jun 2016 and a completion of Oct 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 22, 2016
First posted
Sep 7, 2016
Start
Mar 2016
Primary completionActual
Jun 2016
CompletionEst.
Oct 2016
Last update
Sep 7, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 7, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02889887
Lead sponsor
Gazi University
Responsible party
Halil Ibrahim Celik (research assistant, Gazi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 7, 2016
Start date
Mar 2016
Primary completion
Jun 2016
Completion
Oct 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 7, 2016

Study contacts

HALİL İ ÇELİK
principal investigator · Gazi University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion