CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02887989Updated Nov 20, 2018Results posted

Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention for Non-Opioid Pain Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Virtual Reality and Health and Wellness Channel in Pain and Pain Management, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 110 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-20.

Sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 110 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of VR non-opioid management vs. a control "sham" intervention for a broad and representative group of medical and surgical patients with pain. Hospitalized patients will receive specialized VR interventions, administered via portable VR headsets, to manage breakthrough pain. Control patients will view content on the in-room Health and Wellness television channel. Investigators will follow patients throughout the course of their hospitalization and monitor outcomes during and after their stays, including pain levels, medication requests, and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

The study population will consist of 120 patients - 60 patients who are exposed to VR, and 60 control patients exposed to an audiovisual "sham" intervention. Investigators will select up to 120 hospitalized patients at CSMC admitted during the study period of November 2016 to September 2017. The inpatient wards serve patients ranging in age from 18 to over 100, allowing us to assess the feasibility of using VR across diverse age groups. Appropriate inpatients will be selected at random by Dr. Rosen or other authorized co-investigators or study staff, who will obtain relevant clinical variables from the EHR. All patients admitted to the hospital will be considered for the study. The location and identity of the inpatient will be relayed by their attending physician to a member of the study team, who will deliver a randomly selected intervention (either VR or Health and Wellness Channel) to the patient the same day (at the patient's discretion). The patient will continue usage as needed for up to 20 days of the hospital stay. VR Interventions include both relaxing environment and engaging games. The Health and Wellness Channel includes some of the same types of content, but it is delivered passively through the in-room television system. Investigators will examine changes in pain level, length of stay, medication requests (amount and timing), Quality of Life, Functioning, and Patient Satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain
  • Pain Management

Keywords

  • Virtual Reality
  • Non-Opioid Pain Management
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 441 studies on the registry; 108 are open to participants now.

Of its 62 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 47 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 110 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to understand the goals of the study and provide informed consent
  • Any hospitalized patient under care of CSMC inpatient service (ISP), gastroenterology, or psychiatry, admitted between November 2016 and 30 September 2017, who is not excluded due to criteria listed below.
  • At least one pain score ≥ 3 documented in the EHR.
  • Received at least three doses of opioid medication for breakthrough pain, documented in the EHR.
  • At least 18 years of age
  • English speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to consent to study due to cognitive difficulty
  • Contact Isolation
  • Current diagnosis of epilepsy, dementia, or other neurological disease that may prevent use of VR hardware and software
  • Sensitivity to flashing light or motion
  • Pregnancy, or a medical condition where the patient is prone to frequent nausea or dizziness
  • Recent stroke
  • Post-transplant patient, or pre-transplant patient with severe illness
  • Patient on ventilator, BiPAP, or other breathing assistance equipment
  • Injury to the eyes, face, neck, or arms that prevents comfortable use of VR hardware or software, or safe use of the hardware (e.g., open sores, wounds, or skin rash on face)
  • Non-English speaking
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
140 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual Reality

    Patients will be allowed to use commercially-available VR equipment in their hospital rooms for up to 20 days, as needed to manage pain as an adjunct to opioid and non-opioid pain medication.

    Device: Virtual Reality

  • Sham comparator
    'Health and Wellness Channel'

    Patients will be allowed to watch relaxing television content in their hospital rooms for up to 20 days, as needed to manage pain as an adjunct to opioid and non-opioid pain medication.

    Device: Health and Wellness Channel

Interventions

  • DeviceVirtual Reality

    A menu of VR experiences, lasting from 3-30 minutes each. For example, patients may watch a soothing virtual campfire, or fly over a scenic landscape, or play an interactive game.

  • DeviceHealth and Wellness Channel

    Relaxing content broadcast passively on the patient in-room television channel.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity Ratings (NRS)

    The primary outcome was pain intensity collected via ecological momentary assessment in the course of usual care by hospital staff. At three-to-four hour intervals during waking hours, subjects were asked by their assigned nurse to rate their pain using a standard 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "worst imaginable pain." Data are summarized as pre/post mean and in time-series.

    Time frame: Approximately every 3-4 hours for the period 48 hours pre and post intervention

  2. Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)

    Opioid usage was defined as mean total milligrams of morphine equivalent (MME), calculated by first multiplying the quantity of each prescribed medication by the strength of that medication (milligrams of given opioid per unit dispensed), and then multiplying this quantity-strength product by conversion factors derived from published sources to estimate the milligrams of morphine equivalent to the opioids dispensed in the prescription. The mean pre-intervention MME for subjects in each arm was calculated by adding the morphine equivalents for each prescription dispensed during the 48 hours before intervention, while the post-intervention MME for subjects in each arm was calculated by adding the morphine equivalents for each prescription dispensed during the 48 hours after intervention.

    Time frame: assessed at 48 hours before intervention and 48 hours after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Stay) LOS

    defined as the number of days from the date of admission to date of hospital discharge. Hour of admission was not available in these data, so patients admitted late on Day 0 (i.e., before midnight), and discharged the following calendar day (i.e., between 00:00 and 23:59), were counted as a 1-day hospital stay. Patients who were admitted and discharged on the same calendar day were considered to have an LOS of 0.

    Time frame: Count of Days in Hospital Stay up to 20

07

Results

Posted Nov 20, 2018
Limitations and caveats
Usage data was not collected, so no conclusions regarding actual dose/response can be made.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVirtual RealityIn-Room Television
Started7070
Completed6159
Not completed911
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject811
Withdrew: Death10

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Intensity Ratings (NRS)

The primary outcome was pain intensity collected via ecological momentary assessment in the course of usual care by hospital staff. At three-to-four hour intervals during waking hours, subjects were asked by their assigned nurse to rate their pain using a standard 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "worst imaginable pain." Data are summarized as pre/post mean and in time-series.

Time frame:
Approximately every 3-4 hours for the period 48 hours pre and post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Intensity Ratings (NRS)
score on a scaleVirtual RealityIn-Room Television
Pain Intensity Ratings (NRS)4.66 ± 2.914.94 ± 3.04
PrimaryMorphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)

Opioid usage was defined as mean total milligrams of morphine equivalent (MME), calculated by first multiplying the quantity of each prescribed medication by the strength of that medication (milligrams of given opioid per unit dispensed), and then multiplying this quantity-strength product by conversion factors derived from published sources to estimate the milligrams of morphine equivalent to the opioids dispensed in the prescription. The mean pre-intervention MME for subjects in each arm was calculated by adding the morphine equivalents for each prescription dispensed during the 48 hours before intervention, while the post-intervention MME for subjects in each arm was calculated by adding the morphine equivalents for each prescription dispensed during the 48 hours after intervention.

Time frame:
assessed at 48 hours before intervention and 48 hours after intervention
Reported as:
Mean · Morphine milligram equivalents (MME)
Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)
Morphine milligram equivalents (MME)Virtual RealityIn-Room Television
pre-intervention MME75.07 ± 7.2580.83 ± 6.86
post-intervention MME77.08 ± 6.3481.04 ± 6.193888
Statistical analysis
  • Virtual Reality vs In-Room Television · t-test, 2 sided · p = .6570
SecondaryLength of Stay) LOS

defined as the number of days from the date of admission to date of hospital discharge. Hour of admission was not available in these data, so patients admitted late on Day 0 (i.e., before midnight), and discharged the following calendar day (i.e., between 00:00 and 23:59), were counted as a 1-day hospital stay. Patients who were admitted and discharged on the same calendar day were considered to have an LOS of 0.

Time frame:
Count of Days in Hospital Stay up to 20
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Stay) LOS
daysVirtual RealityIn-Room Television
Length of Stay) LOS5.11 ± .585.64 ± .95
Statistical analysis
  • Virtual Reality vs In-Room Television · t-test, 2 sided · p = .6339

Adverse events

Collected over 96 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Virtual Reality1/70 (1.4%)0/70 (0%)0/70 (0%)
In-Room Television0/70 (0%)0/70 (0%)0/70 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Virtual RealityIn-Room TelevisionTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years484593
>=65 years131427
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Virtual RealityIn-Room TelevisionTotal
Mean51.00 ± 15.0950.02 ± 15.9250.8 ± 15.48
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Virtual RealityIn-Room TelevisionTotal
Female312960
Male303060
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Virtual RealityIn-Room TelevisionTotal
Race — white383977
Race — African-American211031
Race — Other21012
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Virtual RealityIn-Room TelevisionTotal
United States6159120
Pain Type
Pain Type(Participants)Virtual RealityIn-Room TelevisionTotal
Visceral232043
Somatic383977
Last pain score pre-intervention
Last pain score pre-intervention(units on a scale)Virtual RealityIn-Room TelevisionTotal
Mean3.31 ± 2.833.97 ± 3.133.63 ± 2.99
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mosadeghi S, Reid MW, Martinez B, Rosen BT, Spiegel BM. Feasibility of an Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention for Hospitalized Patients: An Observational Cohort Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jun 27;3(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/mental.5801. PubMed 27349654 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 20, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02887989
Lead sponsor
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Responsible party
Brennan Spiegel (Director, Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 2, 2016
Start date
Nov 16, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 17, 2017
Completion
Aug 17, 2017
Results posted
Nov 20, 2018
Last update
Nov 20, 2018

Study contacts

Brennan Spiegel, MD, MSHS
principal investigator · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion