CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02879058Updated Mar 4, 2019

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic or Robotic Myomectomy Patients

An interventional study of Intraoperative contact ultrasonography in Fibroid Uterus and Quality of Life, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-04.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Due to inadequate enrollment.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study evaluates whether use of intraoperative ultrasound during laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy impacts quality of life. Half of participants will undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy with use of the intraoperative ultrasound and half will undergo traditional laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy.

Read the detailed description

In full acknowledgement of the correlation between complete leiomyoma exeresis and symptom relief, the investigators hypothesize that use of contact ultrasonography at the time of laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will enable improved identification and extraction of uterine fibroids which will, in turn, lead to a greater improvement in quality of life among those women who receive intraoperative ultrasound compared to those who do not. In this blinded randomized controlled trial, the investigators will augment traditional laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy with intraoperative ultrasound in half the symptomatic patients enrolled in the study. The other half will be randomized to undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy without use of intra-operative ultrasound. Both groups will complete Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS- QOL) questionnaires before and after surgery (6 months post procedure) to determine whether use of laparoscopic contact ultrasonography has a positive impact on patients' quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fibroid Uterus
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Leiomyoma

490 studies on the registry are indexed under Leiomyoma; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 62 across 345 interventional studies indexed under Leiomyoma.

Browse Leiomyoma studies →

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 818 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 89 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Premenopausal and nonpregnant
  2. Advised to undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy by their provider
  3. Documented imaging with transvaginal ultrasound or pelvic MRI within the past year, which accurately and within reason documents the location and number of leiomyomas present within the uterus
  4. If deemed necessary by the provider, must have a pelvic MRI prior to surgery that states there are no concerning findings for malignancy
  5. Must be eligible to undergo laparoscopic surgery and willing to present for clinic and imaging follow up during the 6 months following myomectomy
  6. Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Appearance of uterus concerning for malignancy on pelvic MRI
  2. Current pregnancy
  3. Any contraindication to laparoscopic or robotic surgery
  4. Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs in the past 36 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Without Ultrasound

    Laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will be performed without aid of intraoperative contact ultrasonography

  • Experimental
    With Ultrasound

    Laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will be performed with aid of intraoperative contact ultrasonography

    Procedure: Intraoperative contact ultrasonography

Interventions

  • ProcedureIntraoperative contact ultrasonography

    In patients randomized to myomectomy with contact ultrasonography, the laparoscopic or robotic ultrasound probe will be advanced through an existing port site into the pelvis after traditional myomectomy has been performed. The face of the ultrasound transducer will be guided over the uterus (including open hysterotomy sites) in systematic strokes, taking special care to note locations of myomas that may have been missed by the preceding excision. Additional hysterotomy sites will be made as necessary in order to remove persistent myomas. Any number of additional ultrasound passes and excisions may be performed in order to achieve the most comprehensive removal of myomas.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Quality of Life

    Symptom and health-related quality of life will be measured by The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) questionnaire administered to all study participants before myomectomy and 6 months post-myomectomy.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline (before surgery) and 6 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operating Time

    Operating time is defined as the total period of time from when the procedure starts until the procedure is deemed complete.

    Time frame: Measured at surgery

  2. Blood Loss

    Blood loss (in mL) will be estimated for all procedures by the primary surgeon and gleaned from the anesthesia operative flowsheet.

    Time frame: Measured at surgery

  3. Weight of Excised Myomas

    After extraction, all myomas will be submitted to pathology. Their cumulative weight will be measured by the Pathologist and gleaned by the research team from the final pathology report.

    Time frame: Measured at the time of Pathology evaluation.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic Florida
    Weston, Florida 33331, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shimanuki H, Takeuchi H, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Kinoshita K. Effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound in reducing recurrent fibroids during laparoscopic myomectomy. J Reprod Med. 2006 Sep;51(9):683-8. PubMed 17039695 ↗
  • Nezhat FR, Roemisch M, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat CR. Recurrence rate after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998 Aug;5(3):237-40. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80025-x. PubMed 9668143 ↗
  • Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;174(2):654-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70445-3. PubMed 8623802 ↗
  • Radosa MP, Owsianowski Z, Mothes A, Weisheit A, Vorwergk J, Asskaryar FA, Camara O, Bernardi TS, Runnebaum IB. Long-term risk of fibroid recurrence after laparoscopic myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Sep;180:35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 2. PubMed 25016181 ↗
  • Fedele L, Parazzini F, Luchini L, Mezzopane R, Tozzi L, Villa L. Recurrence of fibroids after myomectomy: a transvaginal ultrasonographic study. Hum Reprod. 1995 Jul;10(7):1795-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136176. PubMed 8582982 ↗
  • Hanafi M. Predictors of leiomyoma recurrence after myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):877-81. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000156298.74317.62. PubMed 15802421 ↗
  • Fauconnier A, Chapron C, Babaki-Fard K, Dubuisson JB. Recurrence of leiomyomata after myomectomy. Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Nov-Dec;6(6):595-602. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.6.595. PubMed 11129693 ↗
  • Doridot V, Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Babaki-Fard K. Recurrence of leiomyomata after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001 Nov;8(4):495-500. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60610-x. PubMed 11677326 ↗
  • Piccolboni P, Settembre A, Angelini P, Esposito F, Palladino S, Corcione F. Laparoscopic ultrasound: a surgical "must" for second line intra-operative evaluation of pancreatic cancer resectability. G Chir. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):5-8. PubMed 25827662 ↗
  • Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1. PubMed 11814511 ↗
  • Manyonda IT, Bratby M, Horst JS, Banu N, Gorti M, Belli AM. Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: impact on quality of life--results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus: Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Jun;35(3):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0228-5. Epub 2011 Jul 20. PubMed 21773858 ↗
  • Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C. PubMed 12719681 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Selected de-identified ultrasound images and surgical data will be shared with BK Ultrasound, the manufacturer of the ultrasound device.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02879058
Lead sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Responsible party
Katherine Smith (Clinical fellow, The Cleveland Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 25, 2016
Start date
Jun 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2018
Completion
Dec 2018
Last update
Mar 4, 2019

Study contacts

Stephen E Zimberg, MD
principal investigator · Cleveland Clinic Florida
Katherine A Smith, MD
principal investigator · Cleveland Clinic Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion