An interventional study of D700 System in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by EPD Solutions, A Philips Company. Completed at 1 site in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-18.
Sponsored by EPD Solutions, A Philips Company · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate real-time gap detection using EPD D700 dielectric sensing compared with customary electrical isolation tests and Adenosine infusion at the end of the procedure. Furthermore, safety, usability and clinical applicability of the system for guided AF ablation will be confirmed.
Prospective, single-center, non-randomized, non-blinded, open label, and single arm study.
All procedures will be performed under CARTO-3 guidance for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The EPD D700 system will be used in-tandem, to record pre-, during and immediate post-ablation tissue characteristics and compute likelihood of lesion transmurality and permanency. Additionally, D700 system safety, feasibility, usability and clinical applicability will be documented.
The entire procedure will be conducted as customary, using standard and approved off-the-shelf equipment (body surface electrodes, diagnostic and irrigated ablation catheters, RF generator and recording system), in a completely clinically independent manner from the EPD D700 system. The physician will neither use nor rely on any of the D700 system output for clinical decision making and will be blinded to the D700 lesion assessment forecasts. After 30 days following the initial procedure, a repeated procedure will be performed for gap detection and its results will be correlated with the D700 predictions.
3,872 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 926 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 144 across 2,381 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.
Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →EPD Solutions, A Philips Company is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients referred to catheter-based Atrial-Fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure therapy comprising of Pulmonary Veins Isolation (PVI).
Device: D700 System
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedure
ETA Reading at Index Procedure vs. Actual Gaps at 1-month Restudy
ETA Reading at Index Procedure vs. Actual Gaps at 1-month Restudy. All patients underwent PVI at index procedure. The physicians were blinded to the D700 (KODEX-EPD) ETA function pairwise real-time lesion assessment readings. All patients were restudied at 1-mont, and ETA reading, which is the number of gaps as predicted by the system, were compared to the actual gaps as validated in the second procedure after one month.
Time frame: 30 days
1-month Patient Analysis
ETA Reading at Index Procedure vs. Actual Gaps at 1-month Restudy
Time frame: 30 days
For DURABLE-1 22 consecutive paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients were recruited. The trial was extended (DURABLE-1.1) and altogether 39 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients were recruited.
| Milestone | D700 (KODEX-EPD) System |
|---|---|
| Started | 39 |
| Completed | 36 |
| Not completed | 3 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 2 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 1 |
ETA Reading at Index Procedure vs. Actual Gaps at 1-month Restudy. All patients underwent PVI at index procedure. The physicians were blinded to the D700 (KODEX-EPD) ETA function pairwise real-time lesion assessment readings. All patients were restudied at 1-mont, and ETA reading, which is the number of gaps as predicted by the system, were compared to the actual gaps as validated in the second procedure after one month.
| participants | D700 (KODEX-EPD) |
|---|---|
| No 1-month gaps: Positive ETA reading at index | 231 |
| No 1-month gaps: Negative ETA reading at index | 1549 |
| Actual 1-month gaps: Positive ETA reading at index | 48 |
| Actual 1-month gaps: Negative ETA reading at index | 13 |
ETA Reading at Index Procedure vs. Actual Gaps at 1-month Restudy
| Participants | D700 (KODEX-EPD) |
|---|---|
| 1-month gaps — Positive ETA reading at index procedure | 18 |
| 1-month gaps — Negative ETA reading at index procedure | 9 |
| No 1-month gaps — Positive ETA reading at index procedure | 9 |
| No 1-month gaps — Negative ETA reading at index procedure | 0 |
Collected over 1 month; Hospitalization periods - index procedure and restudy (after 1 month from the first procedure), until discharge;. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| D700 (KODEX-EPD) | 0/39 (0%) | 1/39 (2.6%) | 0/39 (0%) |
| Event | D700 (KODEX-EPD) |
|---|---|
| TIANervous system disorders | 1/39 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | D700 System |
|---|---|
| Mean | 58.5 ± 7.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | D700 System |
|---|---|
| Female | 20 |
| Male | 16 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | D700 System |
|---|
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | D700 System |
|---|---|
| Russia | 36 |
| Arterial Hypertension(participants) | D700 System |
|---|---|
| Number | 25 |
| Diabetes Mellitus(Participants) | D700 System |
|---|---|
| Count of participants | 5 |
| Valvular Heart Disease(Participants) | D700 System |
|---|---|
| Count of participants | 5 |
| Moderate Alcohol Consumption(Participants) | D700 System |
|---|---|
| Count of participants | 12 |
7 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
EPD Solutions, A Philips Company