An observational study in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-17.
Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini · Observational
Functional assessment of non-culprit lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome could improve risk stratification and shorten the duration of hospital stay by decreasing the need for additional non-invasive stress testing to detect residual myocardial ischemia. The investigators aimed to assess the reliability of the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in non-culprit coronary lesions during the acute and subacute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients who present with ST elevation myocardial infarction have multivessel coronary artery disease on angiography. Whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be limited to the culprit lesion only or applied to all angiographically critical non-culprit lesions is still debatable. The FAME 2 study has shown that Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)-guided PCI, with adenosine infusion, reduces the MACE compared to medical therapy alone. In fact, according to the recent ESC clinical guidelines, FFR guided PCI is in class I, evidence level A. Previous studies, have confirmed that FFR values of non-culprit coronary lesions in STEMI patients provided similar values in the acute phase compared to the subacute phase, 5-7 days after primary PCI. Consequently, it is possible to assess angiographically borderline non-culprit lesions during the acute phase and hence risk stratify STEMI patients, thus reducing the duration of hospital stay by decreasing the need for additional non-invasive stress testing to detect residual myocardial ischemia. However, the assessment of angiographically borderline lesions using FFR has its own limitations related to the use of adenosine, which increases the risk of bradyarrhythmias and high degree atrioventricular block, especially in the acute phase. This would make functional assessment of the non-culprit lesions not always possible during the acute phase.
Recently, a new functional algorithm, called "instantaneous wave-free ratio" (iFR) has been introduced. Similar to FFR, it gives a functional assessment of coronary lesions by measuring the trans-stenotic gradient during ventricular diastole, where intramyocardial resistance is minimal and constant. This phase has been shown to be comparable to the maximum hyperemic state of FFR assessment.
The measurement of iFR during the acute phase of STEMI has not yet been evaluated.
AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in non-culprit coronary lesions during the acute and subacute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
METHOD: Patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI and presenting with multivessel coronary disease (at least one ≥ 50% diameter stenosis in a non-infarct-related coronary artery) were enrolled in a prospective observational registry. Coronary lesions were evaluated with both iFR and FFR immediately after primary PCI (acute phase) and 7 ± 3 days later (subacute phase).
2,744 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 418 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 500 across 983 observational studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.
Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI and presenting with multivessel coronary disease (at least one ≥ 50% diameter stenosis in a non-infarct-related coronary artery).
Exclusion Criteria:
The investigators compare FFR and iFR values in the acute phase of STEMI and in the subacute phase, 5-7 days after STEMI.
Other: FFR and iFR
The investigators aimed to assess the reliability of the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in non-culprit coronary lesions during the acute and subacute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Reproducibility of iFR and FFR values in the non culprit lesion during STEMI in the acute and subacute phase.
Comparison of iFR and FFR values for evaluating the functional significance of non-culprit coronary lesions in patients with STEMI, both during primary PCI and during staged procedures,
Time frame: 5-7 days
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini