An observational study in Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by Hanyang University. Status unknown at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-15.
Sponsored by Hanyang University · Observational
In this study, we want to find out whether the recognition of cardiac arrest using a smart watch is feasible or not. If this idea is possible, the recognition of cardiac arrest using the smart watch is easy and fast to the witness, like a general person. By using the smart watch, the emergency response system for cardiac arrest and the bystander CPR or BLS is beginning earlier than using conventional cardiac arrest recognition method in field.
In Korea, an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) was occurred twenty thousand person per year, and among them sixty percent was occurred in their home. We already knew that a survivor rate and neurological outcome of OHCA patient has a close relation with initial emergency management in field, like a bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), Basic Life Support (BLS), etc. However, in Korea, a witness almost did not the bystander CPR or BLS in field until highly trained rescuers arrived there. So, total survivor rate is just 2.4 % irrespective of neurologic outcome in Korea.
Generally, in Korea, a beginning of the bystander CPR progress throughout dispatcher's instruction of emergency response system. This system for OHCA patient activate only when the witness recognize cardiac arrest and call the emergency response system. Therefore, cardiac arrest recognition by the witness is very important.
However, a conventional recognition of cardiac arrest in field is often difficult, because there are no monitoring devices, healthcare providers. The conventional recognition method of cardiac arrest is that it is firstly to check mental status, secondly check pulse on patient's carotid artery and self-respiration. This method is too difficult for the witness, especially general persons. Even, it is difficult for an emergency physicians, too.
Consequentially, the recognition of cardiac arrest by the witness is generally delayed, a golden-time is running out until highly trained rescuers arrive there. An average arrival time of highly trained rescuers is eight to ten minutes. A hypoxic brain damage is begin from four minutes after cardiac arrest. As a result, this delayed time is already passed four minutes after cardiac arrest. So, the survivor rate and the neurologic outcome are not good enough.
In this study, we want to find out whether the recognition of cardiac arrest using a smart watch is feasible or not. If this idea is possible, the recognition of cardiac arrest using the smart watch is easy and fast to the witness, like a general person. By using the smart watch, the emergency response system for cardiac arrest and the bystander CPR or BLS is beginning earlier than using conventional cardiac arrest recognition method in field.
966 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 227 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 200 across 383 observational studies indexed under Heart Arrest.
Browse Heart Arrest studies →Hanyang University is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Shock or Cardiac arrest patients in emergency room.
Exclusion Criteria:
Check pulse with smart watch on wrist, carotid artery, and eye of patients in shock or cardiac arrest state.
The minimum blood pressure on wrist
mmHg, Blood pressure in minimum checkable pulse using smart watch
Time frame: 10 seconds
The minimum blood pressure on carotid artery
mmHg, Blood pressure in minimum checkable pulse using smart watch
Time frame: 10 seconds
The minimum blood pressure on eye
mmHg, Blood pressure in minimum checkable pulse using smart watch
Time frame: 10 seconds
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hanyang University