CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02853240TOXIMUS_CPUpdated Jan 18, 2020

Effect of Botulinum Toxin on Muscles of Children With Cerebral Palsy

An interventional study of Muscle biopsy in Cerebral Palsy, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-18.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
8 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of non-progressive motor dysfunction but often changing, secondary to injury or brain abnormalities that occur in early stages of development. In children with CP, the brain injury lead to a delayed motor development in the first weeks, associated with muscular spasticity. Drug treatments include oral treatments (baclofen and tizanidine) and injectable treatments like Botox (intramuscular injection) and neurolysis with alcohol or phenol (local injection into the nerve).

Regarding botulinum toxin, there is no study questioning its effectiveness. However, no publication on the pathophysiology of human muscle of the CP child after toxin injection was found. The action of the toxin on the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) and muscle structure is unknown in children with CP.

The primary objective of this study is to describe structural abnormalities of the CP child's muscle following multiple toxin injections in terms of NMJ fragmentation and axonal sprouting.

Secondary objectives:

To evaluate the relationship between:

  • The severity of the motor impairment and muscle structural abnormalities.
  • The clinical measure of spasticity and muscle structural abnormalities.
  • To compare the structure spastic muscles with toxin injections and spastic muscle without toxin injections

For muscles with multiple toxin injections, assessing the relationship between :

  • The number of toxin injections and muscle structural abnormalities.
  • The date of the first injection and muscle structural abnormalities.
  • The total dose of injected toxin in the muscle and its structural abnormalities.
  • The nature of the product injected in the muscle and its structural abnormalities.

This innovative study will improve the knowledge on the effects of long-term botulinum toxin injections on the muscle (and therefore its safety in usual care), on the spastic muscle NMJ of CP children, on the pathophysiology of the CP child's muscle.

All the visits all acts will be performed according to usual patient follow-up. Only a biopsy will be performed in addition, taken from an injected muscle during a planned operation. A biopsy may also be performed on a muscle without toxin injection if the act is made possible by the planned surgery. No biopsy will be made on a muscle that would not require surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

  • Cerebral palsy
  • children
  • muscle spasticity
  • botulinum toxin injection
03

In context

Paralysis

750 studies on the registry are indexed under Paralysis; 133 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 30 across 537 interventional studies indexed under Paralysis.

Browse Paralysis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,826 studies on the registry; 439 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age Children > 7 years and \<18 years
  • With spastic cerebral palsy (all grades of the combined GMFCS
  • Having an orthopedic surgical indication already planned on the lower limbs
  • Receiving toxin injections
  • With social security coverage
  • Whose parents / holders of parental authority have signed the consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with an evolutive CP
  • Children with a baclofen pump
  • Children who underwent neurotomy or functional dorsal rhizotomy, or alcohol or phenol injections
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Children with spastic CP receiving toxin injections

    Children with spastic cerebral palsy receiving toxin injections

    Procedure: Muscle biopsy

Interventions

  • ProcedureMuscle biopsy

    A biopsy (specifically done for the study) of a muscle that has already been injected with botulinum toxin before inclusion of the patient in the study will be performed, taken during a planned surgery (for tendon transfer or muscle lengthening). A biopsy of a muscle that has never been injected with botulinum toxin may be performed during surgery. No biopsy will be made on a member that would not require surgery. Thus sampling will be conducted on a muscle requiring a surgery: 2 to 3 millimeters will be taken on 10 mm muscle before transfer or lengthening.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence of neuromuscular junctions fragmentation (both qualitative and quantitative).

    The biopsy is performed at the same time of a scheduled general anesthesia surgery (multisite surgery). The biopsy is 2 to 3 mm x 10 mm. It is a simple and quick gesture, usually practiced by surgeon

    Time frame: 6 months maximum (time of surgery)

  2. Presence of axonal sprouting (qualitative).

    Time frame: 6 months maximum (time of surgery)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of muscles with neuromuscular junctions fragmentation (both qualitative and quantitative) and/or axonal sprouting (qualitative) according to patient's GMFCS grade (1 to 5).

    The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) is a 5 level clinical classification system that describes the gross motor function of people with cerebral palsy on the basis of self-initiated movement abilities.

    Time frame: 6 months maximum (time of surgery)

  2. Proportion of muscles with neuromuscular junctions fragmentation (both qualitative and quantitative) and/or axonal sprouting (qualitative) according to Ashworth score.

    The Ashworth scale is bedside tool for assessing muscle spasticity in patients with neurological conditions. Ashworth grades as follows: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, 4.

    Time frame: 6 months maximum (time of surgery)

  3. Proportion of muscles with neuromuscular junctions fragmentation (both qualitative and quantitative) and/or axonal sprouting (qualitative) according to Tardieu score.

    The Tardieu Scale is bedside tool for assessing muscle spasticity in patients with neurological conditions. Tardieu scale grades from 0 to 5.

    Time frame: 6 months maximum (time of surgery)

  4. Proportion of muscles with neuromuscular junctions fragmentation (both qualitative and quantitative) and/or axonal sprouting (qualitative) according to the number of toxin injections in the muscle.

    Time frame: 6 months maximum (time of surgery)

  5. Proportion of muscles with neuromuscular junctions fragmentation (both qualitative and quantitative) and/or axonal sprouting (qualitative) according to the delay (in months) since the first toxin injection in the muscle

    Time frame: 6 months maximum (time of surgery)

  6. Proportion of muscles with neuromuscular junctions fragmentation (both qualitative and quantitative) and/or axonal sprouting (qualitative) according to the total volume (IU) of injected toxin since the first injection in the muscle.

    Time frame: 6 months maximum (time of surgery)

  7. Proportion of muscles with neuromuscular junctions fragmentation (both qualitative and quantitative) and/or axonal sprouting (qualitative) according to the brand of the injected toxin (Botox® or Dysport®).

    Time frame: 6 months maximum (time of surgery)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant
    Bron, 69500, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02853240
Lead sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 2, 2016
Start date
Oct 24, 2016
Primary completion
Jan 10, 2020
Completion
Jan 10, 2020
Last update
Jan 18, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion