CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02846467Updated Aug 10, 2016

Information Improvement for Surgical Patients Through Portable Video Media

An interventional study of Informed consent trough a portable video media and Written informed consent in Prostatic Hyperplasia and Bladder Cancer, sponsored by Hospital Universitario Puerto Real. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-10.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitario Puerto Real · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
193
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the comprehension of the Informed consent with the Standard Verbal Communication (SVC) versus Portable Video Media (PVM).

Read the detailed description

The informed consent (IC) is a fully ethical and legal consolidated requirement. IC is the voluntary authorization by a patient for surgical treatment (MeSH). The IC has to include: 1. What is and for what is it, 2. How is it made, 3. What effect will produce, 4. which patients will benefit, 5. Alternatives, 6. Risks and special situations.

The standard IC is based in written and verbal information, but the information provided is insufficient, leading to misunderstanding and even litigation.

Technology plays an important role in the improvement of IC: the portable video media, tablet, with the application (app) iURO assists the procedure through videos and illustrations.

To evaluate and measure the comprehension of the information that patients received, we elaborated and validated a "Questionnaire to evaluate the comprehension of IC" (the process was mounted as "Questionnaire for urology IC validation" in the poster session at the 17th International European Association of Urology Nurses (EAUN) Meeting, Munich-Germany).

The patients undergoing to bladder or prostate transurethral resection were selected. Afterwards they were randomized previous the interview, into two groups: patients informed by PVM with the app iUro (experimental group) versus patients with an SVC (control group). The questionnaire was used to compare the comprehension of the surgery immediately and 15 days after the surgery. The items regarding questionnaire were: information, utility of the intervention, side effects, complications, comorbidity, usefulness of information, anxiety and risks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Bladder Cancer

Keywords

  • Informed consent
  • Patient Education
  • Mobile applications
03

In context

Prostatic Hyperplasia

783 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia; 174 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 193 is above the median of 97 across 593 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Browse Prostatic Hyperplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Hospital Universitario Puerto Real as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who are going to receive transurethral resection of bladder or prostate
  • Patients, women and men, older than 18 years without any mental disability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study
  • Patients who have inability to communicate in spanish.
  • Several visual problems that limit the ability to read written material
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
193 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Portable video media

    Patients who receive informed consent trough portable video media around 10 minutes

    Other: Informed consent trough a portable video media

  • Active comparator
    Traditional IC

    Patients who receive traditional IC (written consent) during 10 to 15 minutes

    Other: Written informed consent

Interventions

  • OtherInformed consent trough a portable video media

    Information provided to patients using the mobile application (iURO app)

    Also known as: iURO Application (App)

  • OtherWritten informed consent

    Information provided to patient trough the traditional informed consent (written IC) for transurethral resection of bladder or prostate.

    Also known as: Traditional informed consent, Standard verbal communication

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comprehension of informed consent

    Time frame: Prior to surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comprehension of informed consent

    Time frame: 15 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Urology Department of the University Hospital of Puerto Real
    Puerto Real, Cadiz 11510, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The database with the demographic and results of the participant is going to be available during the next six months. The information will be send with an email request.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02846467
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitario Puerto Real
Collaborators
University of Cadiz
Responsible party
Sebastian Armijos (PhD Urologist, Hospital Universitario Puerto Real) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 27, 2016
Start date
Dec 2013
Primary completion
Oct 2015
Completion
Apr 2016
Last update
Aug 10, 2016

Study contacts

Sebastian Armijos Leon, Urologist
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario Puerto Real
Federico Rodriguez Rubio, Urologist
study director · Univesity of Cadiz
Jorge Rioja Zuazu, Urologist
study chair · Universidad de Zaragoza

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion