ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02845674Updated Nov 19, 2021Results posted

An Open-Label Extension of a Phase 3 Study of OTX-101 in the Treatment of Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

A Phase 3 interventional study of OTX-101 0.09% in Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, sponsored by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-19.

Sponsored by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
258
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a safety extension enrolling subjects participating in Study OTX-101-2016-001 (NCT02688556)

02

Conditions studied

  • Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
03

In context

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 258 is above the median of 82 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.

Browse Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca studies →

Lead sponsor

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Completion of Study OTX-101-2016-001

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
258 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OTX-101 0.09%

    0.09% cyclosporine nanomicellar solution

    Drug: OTX-101 0.09%

Interventions

  • DrugOTX-101 0.09%

    0.09% cyclosporine nanomicellar solution

    Also known as: Seciera

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events

    Number of subjects reporting any AEs

    Time frame: 40 weeks

07

Results

Posted Dec 14, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOTX-101 0.09% to OTX-101 0.09%Vehicle to OTX-101 0.09%
Started129129
Completed11179
Not completed1850

Outcome measures

PrimaryAdverse Events

Number of subjects reporting any AEs

Time frame:
40 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Count of participants
Adverse Events
Count of participantsGroup 1Group 2
Adverse Events6881

Adverse events

Collected over Day 448. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 10/129 (0%)4/129 (3.1%)55/129 (42.6%)
Group 20/129 (0%)4/129 (3.1%)69/129 (53.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGroup 1Group 2
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/1291/129
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders0/1292/129
Wound dehiscenceInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1290/129
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/1290/129
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1291/129
Femur fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1291/129
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent other events
EventGroup 1Group 2
Instillation site painGeneral disorders17/12942/129
Conjunctival hyperaemiaEye disorders12/12914/129
Punctate keratitisEye disorders12/1294/129
Vitreous detachmentEye disorders5/1292/129
Posterior capsule opacificationEye disorders5/1291/129
BlepharitisEye disorders3/1294/129
Instillation site reactionGeneral disorders1/1293/129
Instillation site lacrimationGeneral disorders1/1293/129
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders2/1290/129
Eye irritationEye disorders2/1292/129

Baseline characteristics

Intent to treat population; Group 1 and Group 2 consisted of subsets of subjects who received masked treatment with OTX-101 0.09% or with Vehicle, respectively, in OTX-101-2016-001. All subjects received open-label treatment with OTX-101 0.09% in OTX-101-2016-002

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Group 1Group 2Total
Mean58.4 ± 15.5161.5 ± 14.2160.0 ± 14.92
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1Group 2Total
Female109107216
Male202242
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group 1Group 2Total
Hispanic or Latino18826
Not Hispanic or Latino111121232
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group 1Group 2Total
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian336
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Black or African American121325
White111110221
More than one race224
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sheppard J, Bergmann M, Schechter BA, Luchs J, Ogundele A, Karpecki P. Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 12;15:129-140. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S279364. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33469259 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2016 to primary completion in Aug 2017, 12 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2018, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

Of 12 phase 3 interventional studies under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median); a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 18. This study's 12 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 24, 2016
First posted
Jul 27, 2016
StartActual
Jul 29, 2016
Primary completionActual
Aug 15, 2017
CompletionActual
Aug 15, 2017
Results first posted
Dec 14, 2018
Last update
Nov 19, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02845674
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 27, 2016
Start date
Jul 29, 2016
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2017
Completion
Aug 15, 2017
Results posted
Dec 14, 2018
Last update
Nov 19, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion