CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02840721Updated Oct 23, 2023Results posted

Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability Study of PF-06480605 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

A Phase 2 interventional study of PF-06480605 in Colitis, Ulcerative, sponsored by Telavant, Inc.. Completed at 28 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-23.

Sponsored by Telavant, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of PF-06480605 in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2a, single arm, two-stage study in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Subjects will receive 500 mg of PF-06480605 intravenously every 2 weeks for a total of 7 doses. Blood, stool, and tissue samples will be collected at various time points throughout the study to evaluate safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Duration of participation for subjects will be approximately 8 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colitis, Ulcerative
03

In context

Colitis

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 60 across 771 interventional studies indexed under Colitis.

Browse Colitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Telavant, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects between ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years of age at the time of informed consent
  • Male subjects able to father children and female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use two highly effective methods of contraception throughout the study and until the Week 26 visit
  • Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for ≥ 4 months
  • Subjects with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis as defined by screening colonoscopy with total Mayo score of ≥ 6, with rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1, and an endoscopic subscore of ≥ 2 on the Mayo
  • Active disease beyond the rectum (> 15 cm of active disease at the screening colonoscopy)
  • Must have inadequate response to, loss of response to, or intolerance to at least one conventional therapy for ulcerative colitis such as: Steroids; Immunosuppressants (AZA, 6-MP, or MTX); Anti -TNF inhibitors (eg, infliximab, adalimumab, or golimumab); Anti-integrin inhibitors (eg, vedolizumab).
  • Subjects currently receiving the following treatment are eligible provided they have been on stable doses of Oral 5-ASA or sulfasalazine for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline; oral corticosteroids stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to baseline; 6-MP or AZA stable dose for 8 weeks prior to baseline.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of indeterminate colitis, ischemic colitis, radiation colitis, diverticular disease associated with colitis, microscopic colitis or Crohn's Disease. Subjects with clinical findings suggestive of Crohn's disease (eg, fistulae, granulomas on biopsy) are also excluded.
  • Subjects with colonic dysplasia or neoplasia, toxic megacolon, primary sclerosing cholangitis, known colonic stricture, history of colonic or small bowel stoma, history of colonic or small bowel obstruction or resection
  • Presence of active enteric infections (positive stool culture and sensitivity)
  • Known history of HIV based on documented history with positive serological test, or positive HIV serologic test at screening
  • Presence of a transplanted organ
  • Cancer or history of cancer or lymphoproliferative disease within the previous 5 years (other than resected cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence);
  • Acute coronary syndrome (eg., myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris);
  • Any history of cerebrovascular disease within 24 weeks before screening;
  • Subject with current or a history of QT prolongation
  • Class III or Class IV heart failure
  • Prior evidence of liver injury or toxicity due to methotrexate
  • Abnormality in hematology and/or chemistry profiles during screening (as detailed in the protocol)
  • Subjects receiving the following therapies within the designated time period:

    • > 9 mg/day of oral budesonide or >20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent within 2 weeks prior to baseline
    • IV, IM (parenteral), or topical (rectal) treatment of 5-ASA or corticosteroid enemas/suppositories within 2 weeks prior to baseline
    • Biologics including anti-TNF inhibitors as described: Infliximab, Adalimumab, or Golimumab within 8 weeks prior to baseline
    • Anti-integrin inhibitors (eg, vedolizumab) within 12 weeks prior to baseline
    • Other investigational procedures or products, or live attenuated vaccine within 30 days prior to baseline.
  • Current or history (within 2 years) of serious psychiatric disease or alcohol or drug abuse
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PF-06480605

    PF-06480605 500 mg IV Q2W X 7 doses

    Drug: PF-06480605

Interventions

  • DrugPF-06480605

    PF-06480605 500 mg IV Q2W x 7 Doses

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Who Withdrew Due to Adverse Events

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious AE (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that (1) resulted in death; (2) was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); (3) required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4) resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); (5) resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an event that emerged during treatment having been absent pre-treatment, or worsened relative to the pre-treatment state. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to final onsite visit (Week 26)

  2. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities

    The following parameters were evaluated: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume, platelets, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time), clinical chemistry (bilirubin, direct bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, urate, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, glucose, and creatine kinase), and urinalysis (urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase, urine erythrocytes, urine leukocytes, hyaline casts, and bacteria).

    Time frame: Day 1 up to final onsite visit (Week 26)

  3. Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Pre-specified Criteria

    Vital signs evaluation included sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and pulse rate. Sitting blood pressure was measured with the participant's arm supported at the level of the heart, and recorded to the nearest millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). The same size BP cuff which had been properly sized and calibrated was used to measure BP each time. Number of participants with vital signs data meeting pre-specified criteria is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline up to final onsite visit (Week 26)

  4. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-specified Criteria

    All scheduled 12-lead ECGs were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. Number of participants with ECG data meeting pre-specified criteria is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline up to final onsite visit (Week 26)

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 14, Based on Uniformly Minimum-Variance Unbiased Estimator (UMVUE) - Per Protocol Analysis Set

    Endoscopic improvement at Week 14 was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1, and without friability. The Mayo scoring system was used to assess ulcerative colitis activity, and it ranges from 0 to 12, calculated as sum of 4 sub-scores, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The 4 sub-scores are stool frequency (0=normal number of stools; 1=1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2=3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3= 5 or more stools more than normal); rectal bleeding (0=no blood seen; 1=streaks of blood with stools less than half the time; 2=obvious blood with stool most of the time; 3=blood alone passes); findings on endoscopy (0=normal or inactive disease; 1=mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]; 2=moderate disease \[marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions\]; 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); and physician's global assessment (0=normal; 1=mild disease; 2=moderate disease; 3=severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 14

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission at Week 14 - Full Analysis Set

    Remission: total Mayo score \<=2 with no individual subscore \>1. Mayo scoring system was used to assess ulcerative colitis activity (range: 0 to 12, calculated as sum of 4 subscores, higher scores indicating more severe disease). The 4 subscores are stool frequency (0=normal number of stools; 1=1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2= 3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3= 5 or more stools more than normal); rectal bleeding (0=no blood seen; 1=streaks of blood with stools less than half the time; 2=obvious blood with stool most of the time; 3=blood alone passes); findings on modified endoscopy (0=normal or inactive disease; 1=mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, no friability\]; 2=moderate disease \[marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions\]; 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); and physician's global assessment (0=normal; 1=mild disease; 2=moderate disease; 3=severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 14

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission at Week 14 - Per Protocol Analysis Set

    Remission: total Mayo score \<=2 with no individual subscore \>1. Mayo scoring system was used to assess ulcerative colitis activity (range: 0 to 12, calculated as sum of 4 subscores, higher scores indicating more severe disease). The 4 subscores are stool frequency (0=normal number of stools; 1=1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2= 3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3= 5 or more stools more than normal); rectal bleeding (0=no blood seen; 1=streaks of blood with stools less than half the time; 2=obvious blood with stool most of the time; 3=blood alone passes); findings on modified endoscopy (0=normal or inactive disease; 1=mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, no friability\]; 2=moderate disease \[marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions\]; 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); and physician's global assessment (0=normal; 1=mild disease; 2=moderate disease; 3=severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 14

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Week 14 - Full Analysis Set

    Endoscopic remission at Week 14 was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score of 0. The Mayo scoring system was used to assess ulcerative colitis activity, and it ranges from 0 to 12, calculated as sum of 4 sub-scores, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The 4 sub-scores are stool frequency (0=normal number of stools; 1=1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2= 3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3= 5 or more stools more than normal); rectal bleeding (0=no blood seen; 1=streaks of blood with stools less than half the time; 2=obvious blood with stool most of the time; 3=blood alone passes); findings on endoscopy (0=normal or inactive disease; 1=mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]; 2=moderate disease \[marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions\]; 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); and physician's global assessment (0=normal; 1=mild disease; 2=moderate disease; 3=severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 14

  4. Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06480605

    Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of PF-06480605 was observed directly from data.

    Time frame: 30 minutes pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose on Day 85

  5. Average Serum Concentration (Cav) of PF-06480605

    Average serum concentration (Cav) of PF-06480605 was calculated as AUCtau/tau, where tau was the dosing interval (tau=14 days), and AUCtau was the area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau.

    Time frame: 30 minutes pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose on Day 85

  6. Lowest Serum Concentration (Cmin) of PF-06480605

    Lowest serum concentration (Cmin) of PF-06480605 was observed directly from data.

    Time frame: 30 minutes pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose on Day 85

  7. Area Under the Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to Time Tau (AUCtau) of PF-06480605

    AUCtau of PF-06480605 was calculated using linear/log trapezoidal method; tau was the dosing interval (=14 days).

    Time frame: 30 minutes pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose on Day 85

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)

    Serum samples were analyzed using a new ADA assay with acid pre-treatment followed by a more drug-tolerant cell-based NAb assay. For ADA assay with acid pre-treatment, the sample was deemed positive if log titer \>=1.30; for cell-based NAb assay, the sample was deemed positive if log titer \>=0.699.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to final onsite visit (Week 26)

  9. Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin

    Fecal calprotectin has been used to detect intestinal inflammation (colitis or enteritis) and can serve as a biomarker for inflammatory bowel diseases. Elevated fecal calprotectin levels indicate migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa, which occurs during intestinal inflammation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 8, 12 and 26

  10. Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HsCRP)

    HsCRP is used mainly as a marker of inflammation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, and 26

  11. Change From Baseline in Serum Total Soluable Tumor Necrosis Factor-like Ligand 1A (sTL1A)

    TL1A is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family of cytokines. The investigational product of this study PF-06480605 is a fully human neutralizing antibody against TL1A.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, and 26

07

Results

Posted Jun 19, 2019

Participant flow

Treatment Period
Participant flow — Treatment Period
MilestonePF-06480605 500 mg IV
Started50
Completed49
Not completed1
Withdrew: Adverse event1
Follow-Up
Participant flow — Follow-Up
MilestonePF-06480605 500 mg IV
Started49
Completed42
Not completed7
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4
Withdrew: Withdrawal of consent2

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Who Withdrew Due to Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious AE (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that (1) resulted in death; (2) was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); (3) required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4) resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); (5) resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an event that emerged during treatment having been absent pre-treatment, or worsened relative to the pre-treatment state. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to final onsite visit (Week 26)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Who Withdrew Due to Adverse Events
ParticipantsPF-06480605 500 mg IV
All-causality AEs33
All-causality SAEs3
Treatment-related AEs8
Treatment-related SAEs1
Withdrew due to AEs1
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities

The following parameters were evaluated: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume, platelets, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time), clinical chemistry (bilirubin, direct bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, urate, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, glucose, and creatine kinase), and urinalysis (urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase, urine erythrocytes, urine leukocytes, hyaline casts, and bacteria).

Time frame:
Day 1 up to final onsite visit (Week 26)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
ParticipantsPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities38
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Pre-specified Criteria

Vital signs evaluation included sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and pulse rate. Sitting blood pressure was measured with the participant's arm supported at the level of the heart, and recorded to the nearest millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). The same size BP cuff which had been properly sized and calibrated was used to measure BP each time. Number of participants with vital signs data meeting pre-specified criteria is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline up to final onsite visit (Week 26)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Pre-specified Criteria
ParticipantsPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg1
Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg4
Sitting pulse rate <40 beats per minute (bpm)0
Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm1
Sitting DBP increase from baseline >=20 mm Hg2
Sitting SBP increase from baseline >=30 mm Hg5
Sitting DBP decrease from baseline >=20 mm Hg7
Sitting SBP decrease from baseline >=30 mm Hg1
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-specified Criteria

All scheduled 12-lead ECGs were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. Number of participants with ECG data meeting pre-specified criteria is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline up to final onsite visit (Week 26)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-specified Criteria
ParticipantsPF-06480605 500 mg IV
PR interval >=300 milliseconds (msec)0
QRS duration >=140 msec0
QT interval >=500 msec0
QTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec5
QTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec0
QTcF interval: >=500 msec0
PR interval increase from baseline >=25%/50%0
QRS duration increase from baseline >=50%0
QTcF increase from baseline: 30 to <60 msec9
QTcF increase from baseline: >=60 msec1
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 14, Based on Uniformly Minimum-Variance Unbiased Estimator (UMVUE) - Per Protocol Analysis Set

Endoscopic improvement at Week 14 was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1, and without friability. The Mayo scoring system was used to assess ulcerative colitis activity, and it ranges from 0 to 12, calculated as sum of 4 sub-scores, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The 4 sub-scores are stool frequency (0=normal number of stools; 1=1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2=3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3= 5 or more stools more than normal); rectal bleeding (0=no blood seen; 1=streaks of blood with stools less than half the time; 2=obvious blood with stool most of the time; 3=blood alone passes); findings on endoscopy (0=normal or inactive disease; 1=mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]; 2=moderate disease \[marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions\]; 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); and physician's global assessment (0=normal; 1=mild disease; 2=moderate disease; 3=severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 14, Based on Uniformly Minimum-Variance Unbiased Estimator (UMVUE) - Per Protocol Analysis Set
percentage of participantsPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 14, Based on Uniformly Minimum-Variance Unbiased Estimator (UMVUE) - Per Protocol Analysis Set38.20 (23.82 to 53.68)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Remission at Week 14 - Full Analysis Set

Remission: total Mayo score \<=2 with no individual subscore \>1. Mayo scoring system was used to assess ulcerative colitis activity (range: 0 to 12, calculated as sum of 4 subscores, higher scores indicating more severe disease). The 4 subscores are stool frequency (0=normal number of stools; 1=1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2= 3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3= 5 or more stools more than normal); rectal bleeding (0=no blood seen; 1=streaks of blood with stools less than half the time; 2=obvious blood with stool most of the time; 3=blood alone passes); findings on modified endoscopy (0=normal or inactive disease; 1=mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, no friability\]; 2=moderate disease \[marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions\]; 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); and physician's global assessment (0=normal; 1=mild disease; 2=moderate disease; 3=severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission at Week 14 - Full Analysis Set
percentage of participantsPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission at Week 14 - Full Analysis Set24.00 (13.06 to 38.17)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Remission at Week 14 - Per Protocol Analysis Set

Remission: total Mayo score \<=2 with no individual subscore \>1. Mayo scoring system was used to assess ulcerative colitis activity (range: 0 to 12, calculated as sum of 4 subscores, higher scores indicating more severe disease). The 4 subscores are stool frequency (0=normal number of stools; 1=1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2= 3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3= 5 or more stools more than normal); rectal bleeding (0=no blood seen; 1=streaks of blood with stools less than half the time; 2=obvious blood with stool most of the time; 3=blood alone passes); findings on modified endoscopy (0=normal or inactive disease; 1=mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, no friability\]; 2=moderate disease \[marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions\]; 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); and physician's global assessment (0=normal; 1=mild disease; 2=moderate disease; 3=severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission at Week 14 - Per Protocol Analysis Set
percentage of participantsPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission at Week 14 - Per Protocol Analysis Set26.67 (14.60 to 41.94)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Week 14 - Full Analysis Set

Endoscopic remission at Week 14 was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score of 0. The Mayo scoring system was used to assess ulcerative colitis activity, and it ranges from 0 to 12, calculated as sum of 4 sub-scores, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The 4 sub-scores are stool frequency (0=normal number of stools; 1=1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2= 3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3= 5 or more stools more than normal); rectal bleeding (0=no blood seen; 1=streaks of blood with stools less than half the time; 2=obvious blood with stool most of the time; 3=blood alone passes); findings on endoscopy (0=normal or inactive disease; 1=mild disease \[erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability\]; 2=moderate disease \[marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions\]; 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); and physician's global assessment (0=normal; 1=mild disease; 2=moderate disease; 3=severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Week 14 - Full Analysis Set
percentage of participantsPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Week 14 - Full Analysis Set10.00 (3.33 to 21.81)
SecondaryMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06480605

Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of PF-06480605 was observed directly from data.

Time frame:
30 minutes pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose on Day 85
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanograms (ng)/milliliters (mL)
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06480605
nanograms (ng)/milliliters (mL)PF-06480605 500 mg IV
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06480605263400 ± 54
SecondaryAverage Serum Concentration (Cav) of PF-06480605

Average serum concentration (Cav) of PF-06480605 was calculated as AUCtau/tau, where tau was the dosing interval (tau=14 days), and AUCtau was the area under the concentration-time profile from time 0 to time tau.

Time frame:
30 minutes pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose on Day 85
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanograms (ng)/milliliters (mL)
Average Serum Concentration (Cav) of PF-06480605
nanograms (ng)/milliliters (mL)PF-06480605 500 mg IV
Average Serum Concentration (Cav) of PF-06480605171400 ± 45
SecondaryLowest Serum Concentration (Cmin) of PF-06480605

Lowest serum concentration (Cmin) of PF-06480605 was observed directly from data.

Time frame:
30 minutes pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose on Day 85
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Lowest Serum Concentration (Cmin) of PF-06480605
ng/mLPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Lowest Serum Concentration (Cmin) of PF-0648060587650 ± 50
SecondaryArea Under the Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to Time Tau (AUCtau) of PF-06480605

AUCtau of PF-06480605 was calculated using linear/log trapezoidal method; tau was the dosing interval (=14 days).

Time frame:
30 minutes pre-dose and 1 hour post-dose on Day 85
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng.hr/mL
Area Under the Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to Time Tau (AUCtau) of PF-06480605
ng.hr/mLPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Area Under the Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero to Time Tau (AUCtau) of PF-0648060557610000 ± 45
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)

Serum samples were analyzed using a new ADA assay with acid pre-treatment followed by a more drug-tolerant cell-based NAb assay. For ADA assay with acid pre-treatment, the sample was deemed positive if log titer \>=1.30; for cell-based NAb assay, the sample was deemed positive if log titer \>=0.699.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to final onsite visit (Week 26)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs)
percentage of participantsPF-06480605 500 mg IV
ADA82.0
NAb10.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin

Fecal calprotectin has been used to detect intestinal inflammation (colitis or enteritis) and can serve as a biomarker for inflammatory bowel diseases. Elevated fecal calprotectin levels indicate migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa, which occurs during intestinal inflammation.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 8, 12 and 26
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms/grams
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin
micrograms/gramsPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Baseline3662.25 ± 3556.331
Week 2 change from baseline-1861.38 ± 3565.861
Week 8 change from baseline-2509.43 ± 3751.843
Week 12 change from baseline-2844.26 ± 3623.922
Week 26 change from baseline-2726.97 ± 3673.063
SecondaryChange From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HsCRP)

HsCRP is used mainly as a marker of inflammation.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, and 26
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms/deciliter
Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HsCRP)
micrograms/deciliterPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Baseline0.9316 ± 1.15545
Week 2 change from baseline-0.2136 ± 1.43785
Week 4 change from baseline-0.4883 ± 1.10820
Week 6 change from baseline-0.3314 ± 1.39605
Week 8 change from baseline-0.4875 ± 1.00870
Week 10 change from baseline-0.5738 ± 0.97608
Week 12 change from baseline-0.4242 ± 1.18416
Week 14 change from baseline-0.3983 ± 1.21181
Week 16 change from baseline-0.5070 ± 1.37798
Week 20 change from baseline-0.4728 ± 1.11950
Week 24 change from baseline-0.5334 ± 1.03224
Week 26 change from baseline-0.3453 ± 1.37576
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Serum Total Soluable Tumor Necrosis Factor-like Ligand 1A (sTL1A)

TL1A is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family of cytokines. The investigational product of this study PF-06480605 is a fully human neutralizing antibody against TL1A.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, and 26
Reported as:
Mean · picograms/mL
Change From Baseline in Serum Total Soluable Tumor Necrosis Factor-like Ligand 1A (sTL1A)
picograms/mLPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Baseline103.9 ± 32.05
Week 2 change from baseline3390.4 ± 1349.87
Week 4 change from baseline5308.9 ± 2073.59
Week 6 change from baseline6908.7 ± 3278.23
Week 8 change from baseline7319.3 ± 3587.14
Week 10 change from baseline7175.7 ± 4095.36
Week 12 change from baseline6446.3 ± 4422.46
Week 14 change from baseline6539.1 ± 4836.21
Week 16 change from baseline5316.6 ± 4941.13
Week 20 change from baseline3903.3 ± 4092.26
Week 24 change from baseline3190.2 ± 3172.22
Week 26 change from baseline3084.3 ± 2964.75

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 up to final onsite visit (Week 26). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PF-06480605 500 mg IV0/50 (0%)3/50 (6%)20/50 (40%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPF-06480605 500 mg IV
Colitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders2/50
PeritonitisInfections and infestations1/50
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/50
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPF-06480605 500 mg IV
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders6/50
Colitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders5/50
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders3/50
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/50
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/50
PharyngitisInfections and infestations3/50
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/50

Baseline characteristics

The baseline analysis population included all participants enrolled in the study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PF-06480605 500 mg IV
Mean40.0 ± 14.52
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PF-06480605 500 mg IV
Female22
Male28
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)PF-06480605 500 mg IV
White48
Asian2
08

Study locations

28 sites
  • Surgery Center of Aventura
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Venture Ambulatory Surgical Center
    North Miami Beach, Florida 33162, United States
  • FQL Research, LLC
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33027, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, United States
  • NYU Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates
    Great Neck, New York 11021, United States
  • NYU Langone Nassau Gastroenterology Associates
    Great Neck, New York 11021, United States
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medicine
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Allegiance Research Specialists, LLC
    Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226, United States
  • UZ Leuven (University Hospital Leuven) - Pharmacy Clinical Trials
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • UZ Leuven (University Hospital Leuven) - Radiology Department
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • UZ Leuven (University Hospital Leuven), Campus Gasthuisberg
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • AOU Mater Domini - Univ."Magna Graecia" di Catanzaro - Campus Venuta - U.O Fisiopatologia Digestiva
    Catanzaro, CZ 88100, Italy
  • ISTITUTO CLINICO HUMANITAS Sezione Autonoma di Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche Intestinali
    Rozzano, Milan (MI) 20089, Italy
  • Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico
    Roma, RM 00128, Italy
  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
    Seoul, 03181, Korea, Republic of
  • Asan Medical Center
    Seoul, 05505, Korea, Republic of
  • Academic Medical Center, Apotheek-Kenniscentrum Geneesmiddelenonderzoek
    Amsterdam, North Holland 1105 AZ, Netherlands
  • Academic Medical Centre, Department of Radiology
    Amsterdam, North Holland 1105 AZ, Netherlands
  • Academic Medical Centre, Dept. of Gastroenterology
    Amsterdam, North Holland 1105 AZ, Netherlands
  • SPZOZ WSzZ im. Jedrzeja. Sniadeckiego W Bialymstoku Oddzial Chorob Wewnetrznych i Gastroenterologii
    Bialystok, 15-950, Poland
  • Centrum Endoskopii Zabiegowej, Poradnia Chorob Jelitowych Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im Jana Biziela
    Bydgoszcz, 85-168, Poland
  • Piotr Walczak Gabinet Endoskopii Przewodu Pokarmowego
    Krakow, 31-009, Poland
  • SANTA FAMILIA Centrum Badan Profilaktyki i Leczenia
    Lodz, 90-302, Poland
  • Endoskopia Sp. z.o.o.
    Sopot, 81-756, Poland
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Danese S, Klopocka M, Scherl EJ, Romatowski J, Allegretti JR, Peeva E, Vincent MS, Schoenbeck U, Ye Z, Hassan-Zahraee M, Rath N, Li G, Neelakantan S, Banfield C, Lepsy C, Chandra DE, Hung KE. Anti-TL1A Antibody PF-06480605 Safety and Efficacy for Ulcerative Colitis: A Phase 2a Single-Arm Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Nov;19(11):2324-2332.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jun 12. PubMed 34126262 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 12, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jan 30, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 23, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02840721
Lead sponsor
Telavant, Inc.
Collaborators
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 21, 2016
Start date
Oct 26, 2016
Primary completion
May 31, 2018
Completion
Aug 30, 2018
Results posted
Jun 19, 2019
Last update
Oct 23, 2023

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion