ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02838979Updated Jul 14, 2022Results posted

Trial of Oral Glutamine on Mitochondrial Function in CKD

A Phase 2 interventional study of First Intervention (14 days) and Washout (3 weeks) in Cardiovascular Disease, Sarcopenia and Endothelial Dysfunction, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 69 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-14.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2016, registered Jul 2016).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 69 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary goal of proposed investigation is to study the impact of oral glutamine supplementation on muscle mitochondrial and endothelial cell function measured mitochondrial energetics and vascular function using 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy and optical spectroscopy (MRS/OS) among persons with moderate-severe CKD. The secondary objective is to describe the impact of oral glutamine supplementation on mitochondrial metabolic profile as well as inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers among persons with chronic kidney disease.

Read the detailed description

Chronic kidney disease is associated with endothelial cell dysfunction and muscle wasting contributing to the heightened risk of cardiovascular morbidity, mortality and functional limitation. Accumulation of toxins in renal disease may adversely impact endothelial cell nitric oxide bioavailability and endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) function consequently heightening oxidative stress and suppressing mitochondrial biogenesis. To date no studies have investigated potential therapies for endothelial and muscle dysfunction in renal disease target mitochondrial metabolic and energetic processes.

Animal studies of uremia underscore mitochondrial dysfunction as a potential precursor for endothelial dysfunction. In particular, uremia has been linked to a proteomic signature indicative of metabolic blockage of TCA cycle activity and fatty acid beta-oxidation. Both of these processes are localized to the mitochondria and may suggest that decreased mitochondrial mass or function may augur endothelial dysfunction in renal disease.

Glutamine, an anaplerotic agent and precursor to the antioxidant glutathione, is a potential therapeutic agent bypassing the metabolic block associated with reduced TCA cycle and improving antioxidant reserve. The primary goal of proposed investigation is to study the impact of oral glutamine supplementation on muscle mitochondrial and endothelial cell function measured mitochondrial energetics and vascular function using 31P MRS/OS among persons with moderate-severe CKD. The secondary objective is to describe the impact of oral glutamine supplementation on mitochondrial metabolic profile as well as inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers among persons with chronic kidney disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Disease
  • Sarcopenia
  • Endothelial Dysfunction
  • Muscle Mitochondrial Function
  • Kidney Disease

Keywords

  • Glutamine
  • Chronic Kidney Disease
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

5,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 930 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 100 across 2,801 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,431 studies on the registry; 226 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 69 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults between 20 and 69 years of age
  • Diagnosis of moderate-severe CKD, defined in this study as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≤60ml/min/1.73m2 using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation
  • Ability to understand and provide informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On chronic dialysis
  • Expectation to start dialysis within 6 months or dialysis access in place.
  • Pregnant
  • Have physical immobility (defined by wheelchair use)
  • Insulin dependent diabetes
  • Have implants incompatible with MRI
  • Exercise limiting cardiopulmonary disease (e.g. angina, severe heart valve disease, severe COPD, coronary ischemia)
  • Use of anticoagulation (i.e. warfarin)
  • Baseline systolic blood pressure >160 or diastolic blood pressure >100
  • Inflammatory conditions (e.g. autoimmune disease, HIV)
  • Thyroid disease
  • Dementia or inability to consent
  • Cirrhosis, active/chronic hepatitis
  • Use medications interfering with muscle or mitochondrial function, including steroids, anti-psychotic, Coenzyme Q-10, immunosuppresssives, antivirals, and muscle relaxants
  • Weight >300 lbs
  • Personal history or family history of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism
  • Active malignancy
  • Patients hospitalized within the past 60 days for any reason.
  • Patients with a history of a major atherosclerotic event (defined as combined incidence of myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization, coronary bypass surgery, and stroke) within 3 months
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Oral L-Glutamine first, then Maltodextrin

    Subjects will receive 0.4 g/kg/day of L-glutamine (Nutrestore, EMMAUS Life Sciences, Inc Torrance, CA) in three divided daily doses OR identical appearing maltodextrin powder. Duration 2 weeks

    Dietary Supplement: First Intervention (14 days) · Other: Washout (3 weeks) · Dietary Supplement: Second Intervention (14 days)

  • Experimental
    Maltodextrin first, then L-glutamine

    Subjects will crossover to receiving the study product which they did not receive in the first period. Either 0.4 g/kg/day of L-glutamine in three divided daily doses OR identical appearing maltodextrin powder. Duration 2 weeks

    Dietary Supplement: First Intervention (14 days) · Other: Washout (3 weeks) · Dietary Supplement: Second Intervention (14 days)

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementFirst Intervention (14 days)

    Oral Glutamine or Maltodextrin for 2 weeks

  • OtherWashout (3 weeks)

    No study product is taken prior to beginning crossover

  • Dietary supplementSecond Intervention (14 days)

    Oral Glutamine or Maltodextrin for 2 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Muscle Mitochondrial Function

    31P MRS/OS was used to measure mitochondrial phosphorylation capacity (ATPmax).

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Force-time Integral Area Under the Curve in Active Agent vs. Placebo

    To test if glutamine improves objective isometric muscle fatigue by comparing the measurement of FTI from each arm. Muscle fatigability was tested by calculating FTI as the area under the force-time curve during isometric force generated at 70 % of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC),

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. Muscle Fatigue

    To test the effect of glutamine supplementation on muscle endurance, sum of the muscle force (force-time integral, FTI, N\*s) normalized to maximum voluntary contraction (MVC, N) generated during voluntary contraction.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Plasma NAD+ Levels

    To test if glutamine improves plasma NAD+ compared to placebo. Plasma NAD+ concentrations were quantified in mM using 31p MRS based in vivo assay.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 14, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOral L-Glutamine First, Then MaltodestrinMaltodextrin First, Then L-glutamine
Started65
Completed65
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMuscle Mitochondrial Function

31P MRS/OS was used to measure mitochondrial phosphorylation capacity (ATPmax).

Time frame:
2 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mM ATP/s
Muscle Mitochondrial Function
mM ATP/sL-GlutamineMaltodextrin
Muscle Mitochondrial Function0.88 ± 0.300.90 ± 0.34
Statistical analysis
  • L-Glutamine vs Maltodextrin · ANOVA · p = 0.15 (P-value for the interaction of treatment and sequence) · Mean difference (final values): -0.01Two-way ANOVA was used to assess differences between the groups
SecondaryChange in Force-time Integral Area Under the Curve in Active Agent vs. Placebo

To test if glutamine improves objective isometric muscle fatigue by comparing the measurement of FTI from each arm. Muscle fatigability was tested by calculating FTI as the area under the force-time curve during isometric force generated at 70 % of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC),

Time frame:
2 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · N*s
Change in Force-time Integral Area Under the Curve in Active Agent vs. Placebo
N*sL-GlutamineMaltodextrin
Change in Force-time Integral Area Under the Curve in Active Agent vs. Placebo58.87 ± 24.0752.36 ± 21.22
Statistical analysis
  • L-Glutamine vs Maltodextrin · ANOVA · p = 0.86 (P-value for the interaction of treatment and sequence) · Mean difference (final values): -7.39Two-way ANOVA was used to assess differences between the groups
SecondaryMuscle Fatigue

To test the effect of glutamine supplementation on muscle endurance, sum of the muscle force (force-time integral, FTI, N\*s) normalized to maximum voluntary contraction (MVC, N) generated during voluntary contraction.

Time frame:
2 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · s-1
Muscle Fatigue
s-1L-GlutamineMaltodextrin
Muscle Fatigue2.52 ± 1.092.41 ± 1.03
Statistical analysis
  • L-Glutamine vs Maltodextrin · ANOVA · p = 0.44 (P-value for the interaction of treatment and sequence) · Median difference (final values): -0.10Two-way ANOVA was used to assess differences between the groups
Other pre-specifiedPlasma NAD+ Levels

To test if glutamine improves plasma NAD+ compared to placebo. Plasma NAD+ concentrations were quantified in mM using 31p MRS based in vivo assay.

Time frame:
2 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mM
Plasma NAD+ Levels
mML-GlutamineMaltodextrin
Plasma NAD+ Levels0.95 ± 0.250.98 ± 0.19
Statistical analysis
  • L-Glutamine vs Maltodextrin · ANOVA · p = 0.36 (P-value for the interaction of treatment and sequence) · Mean difference (final values): 0.06Two-way ANOVA was used to assess differences between the groups
Post-hocMaximal Voluntary Contraction

To test if glutamine improves maximal voluntary contraction compared to placebo. Maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) was determined by the isometric force generated using first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle against a force transducer.

Time frame:
2 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · N/m
Maximal Voluntary Contraction
N/mL-GlutamineMaltodextrin
Maximal Voluntary Contraction23.6 ± 6.83423.22 ± 8.967
Statistical analysis
  • L-Glutamine vs Maltodextrin · ANOVA · p = 0.60 (P-value for the interaction of treatment and sequence) · Mean difference (final values): -0.45Two-way ANOVA was used to assess differences between the groups

Adverse events

Collected over 7 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
L-Glutamine0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
Maltodextrin0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)L-Glutamine First, Then MaltodextrinMaltodextrin First, Then L-glutamineTotal
Mean57 ± 16.658 ± 9.858 ± 13.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)L-Glutamine First, Then MaltodextrinMaltodextrin First, Then L-glutamineTotal
Female415
Male246
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)L-Glutamine First, Then MaltodextrinMaltodextrin First, Then L-glutamineTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino6511
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)L-Glutamine First, Then MaltodextrinMaltodextrin First, Then L-glutamineTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian123
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White538
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)L-Glutamine First, Then MaltodextrinMaltodextrin First, Then L-glutamineTotal
United States6511
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ziegler TR, Benfell K, Smith RJ, Young LS, Brown E, Ferrari-Baliviera E, Lowe DK, Wilmore DW. Safety and metabolic effects of L-glutamine administration in humans. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990 Jul-Aug;14(4 Suppl):137S-146S. doi: 10.1177/0148607190014004201. PubMed 2119459 ↗
  • Amara CE, Marcinek DJ, Shankland EG, Schenkman KA, Arakaki LS, Conley KE. Mitochondrial function in vivo: spectroscopy provides window on cellular energetics. Methods. 2008 Dec;46(4):312-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Oct 16. PubMed 18930151 ↗
  • Jones DP, Liang Y. Measuring the poise of thiol/disulfide couples in vivo. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009 Nov 15;47(10):1329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.08.021. Epub 2009 Aug 26. PubMed 19715755 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 7, 2015
  • Informed consent form · Mar 24, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2016 to primary completion in Oct 2017, 19 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2022, 4 years 9 months after primary completion.

Of 54 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Cardiovascular Diseases, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 73. This study's 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 76 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 57.

Cardiovascular Diseases covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 8, 2016
First posted
Jul 20, 2016
StartActual
Feb 25, 2016
Primary completionActual
Oct 1, 2017
CompletionActual
Jan 31, 2018
Results first posted
Jul 14, 2022
Last update
Jul 14, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02838979
Responsible party
Jonathan Himmelfarb (Professor, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 20, 2016
Start date
Feb 25, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2017
Completion
Jan 31, 2018
Results posted
Jul 14, 2022
Last update
Jul 14, 2022

Study contacts

Jonathan Himmelfarb, MD
principal investigator · Kidney Research Insitute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion