ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02836353MaSUpdated Apr 2, 2019

Metabolic Consequences of Gastrointestinal Surgery

An interventional study of Somatostatin and Rifaximin in Gastrectomy, Oesophagectomy and Dumping Syndrome, sponsored by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Terminated at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-02.

Sponsored by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
Reached scientific goals, further recruitment would not further advance the findings of study.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
81
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Surgery on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract results in profound changes to the metabolic profile. This is well described, including the rapid resolution of diabetes seen after bariatric surgery. The underlying pathophysiology, and incidence in lean patients undergoing surgery for cancer, is somewhat less described. The investigators plan to assess the symptomatic and glycaemic profile, as well as causative pathways, for metabolic symptoms in patients after surgery on the GI tract. The investigators will use glucose tolerance tests, physiological challenges with somatostatin analogues and antibiotics, and assess tissue transcriptomic changes.

Read the detailed description

The role of the gut hormone axis in glucose control is of significant interest due to its proven translational impact in diabetes management. It is also significantly altered by gastric surgery, a procedure that can lead to deleterious symptoms (dumping syndrome) in lean, non-diabetic patients. The investigators will study a unique cohort of young, lean patients undergoing surgery for the prevention of gastric cancer, as well as patients undergoing surgery for gastric and oesophageal cancer, to further understand the regulation and pathophysiological role of the gut hormone axis. The prophylactic patient population will be recruited from the pool of patients with a genetic mutation conferring a high lifetime risk of gastric cancer (Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer) for whom Addenbrooke's Hospital provides a national clinical service. The investigators aim to define the causative physiological pathways for dumping syndrome in this group and expand our body of knowledge of gut hormones and their role in glucose homeostasis and eating behaviour.

It has been suspected for some years that surgery has more profound physiological effects than simple anatomical rearrangement, however recent developments in bariatric surgery have brought this to the fore. The era of surgical treatment of peptic ulcer disease resulted in a large cohort of patients undergoing gastric surgery and suffering post-operative dumping symptoms. These include symptoms attributed to hypovolaemia immediately after a meal, followed by hypoglycaemia within a few hours. There was a significant hiatus in the study of dumping syndrome after the decline of surgery for ulcer disease in the 1980s. The major improvement in long-term survival after surgery for oesophageal and gastric cancer seen in the 21st Century, coupled with the identification of high risk familial cohorts who now undergo prophylactic gastrectomy, has led to a growing cohort of long-term survivors after gastrectomy. This presents the significant challenge of defining and managing the ongoing, quality of life-limiting metabolic consequences of gastrointestinal surgery. The late dumping symptoms suffered by this patient cohort include paradoxical post-prandial hypoglycaemia, likely resulting from an excessive insulin response to particular components of ingested food.

There is also a population of patients undergoing oesophagectomy for malignant or pre-malignant conditions of the oesophagus, who receive post-operative nutrition through a feeding tube sited through the abdominal wall and entering the jejunum approximately 1 metre from its origin. This group of patients suffer similar metabolic changes to those undergoing gastrectomy, and provide a unique opportunity to study the differential response to nutrients administered orally or more distally. This could elucidate the role of any proximal gut hormones in glucose homeostasis.

The recent expansion in understanding of the metabolic effects of surgery has largely been driven by the study of bariatric (better termed metabolic) surgery. It is well known that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) can result in early remission of diabetes in 85% of cases and elevated levels of gut hormones such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), but there is considerable debate around whether the gut hormones changes contribute to the reductions in plasma glucose and appetite after surgery. Whereas studies in rodent models appear to indicate that gut hormones are largely redundant after bypass surgery, data from humans strongly support the idea that increased post-prandial GLP-1 and Peptide YY (PYY) levels underlie improvements in insulin secretion and reduced appetite. Studies from bariatric cohorts are confounded by the requirement for dietary restriction before surgery and massive weight loss after surgery.

Multiple studies have measured the baseline and stimulated levels of circulating gut hormones after RYGB in obese subjects. Elevated levels of GLP-1 and PYY and reduced levels of ghrelin have been reported in most studies, and variable results have been found for glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), cholecystokinin (CCK) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP).

Fewer studies have addressed the changes in gut hormone secretion after gastrectomy in lean subjects. Limited studies have demonstrated changes in GLP-1 secretion. Literature on the experimental approach to dumping pathways is largely limited to case reports or small series but indicates a role for the glucose-insulin axis.

The role of gut microbiota in determining host metabolism is a topical area of interest, following discoveries that lean and obese phenotypes can be transferred by gut microbial transplantation in rodent models. Despite the excitement surrounding this area, it remains a highly controversial research field, and the extent to which the human microbiome influences energy metabolism is hotly debated. A variety of microbial metabolites, including short chain fatty acids and indole, however, modulate gut hormone secretion, and likely contribute to basal gut hormone release in the fasting state. An interesting question that has not previously been addressed is whether gut hormone secretion becomes more dependent on microbial metabolism after bypass surgery, either because resident colonic bacteria are supplied with an increased load of fermentable nutrients, or because of increased bacterial growth in the proximal intestine (small intestinal bacterial overgrowth). It is, however, well established that microbial metabolism is altered in some post-surgical patients, as assessed non-invasively by the appearance of raised hydrogen or methane levels in exhaled breath. It is also possible that the differing pool of bacteria between people may contribute to a varied metabolic phenotype - it is therefore important to characterise the microbiome to assess changes arising due to surgery or antibiotic treatment.

Beyond the purely physiological effects of surgery, there is an increasing understanding that removal of the stomach or oesophagus has a profound effect on a person's appetite and eating behaviour. This likely results from the central action of gut derived hormones, and is an area of significant interest in the obesity field. Anecdotally, post-gastrectomy patients frequently report minimal appetite and significant changes in their food preferences. At present, this has not been characterised in a scientifically rigorous fashion. A variety of tools exist to assess the motivation and impulsivity of a person's relationship to food in a non-invasive fashion, which can be administered from home, or as an adjunct to a gut hormone secretion test.

Previous studies from the investigators' group and beyond have demonstrated that L cells, the prime enteroendocrince cells (EECs) secreting GLP-1, directly sense glucose uptake and have receptors for bile acids and short chain free fatty acids (bacterial fermentation products of carbohydrates). Each of these pathways could theoretically contribute to the enteroendocrine detection of ingested carbohydrate, but the relative importance of the different sensory mechanisms before, as well as after, GI surgery is unknown.

Overall, this proposed study of gut hormone secretion and metabolism in the lean population will define the causative pathways of dumping syndrome and provide a model for the study of post-operative gut hormone changes without the confounding effects of massive weight loss. In turn, this will expand knowledge of the physiological pathways underlying gut hormone secretion and their role in glucose homeostasis, with the potential to offer new therapeutic and research targets in diabetes and obesity care, as well as in this patient cohort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastrectomy
  • Oesophagectomy
  • Dumping Syndrome
  • Hypoglycaemia
03

In context

Dumping Syndrome

20 studies on the registry are indexed under Dumping Syndrome; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 81 is above the median of 30 across 17 interventional studies indexed under Dumping Syndrome.

Browse Dumping Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 171 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have undergone previous oesophageal or gastric resection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<18
  • Recent history of untreated anaemia
  • Donated blood in preceding 16 weeks
  • Lack capacity to read and retain information about study
  • Have a known allergy to interventional agent
  • Have received a course of antibiotics in preceding two months
  • Be on medication that interacts with intervention
  • Have a history of C. difficile colitis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
81 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Observational only

    Oral glucose tolerance test, neurocognitive questionnaire tasks only.

  • Experimental
    Somatostatin

    Oral glucose tolerance test after 100mcg Somatostatin

    Drug: Somatostatin

  • Experimental
    Antibiotics

    Oral glucose tolerance test after treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth

    Drug: Rifaximin

Interventions

  • Single dose of short acting Somatostatin (100mcg) pre Oral glucose tolerance test

  • 1 week course of 400mg three times daily (TDS) pre Oral glucose tolerance test

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severity of hypoglycaemia during glucose tolerance test as measured by plasma glucose levels

    Time frame: Glucose tolerance test immediately after drug intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Roberts GP, Kay RG, Howard J, Hardwick RH, Reimann F, Gribble FM. Gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction as a lean model of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 May;14(5):562-568. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.039. Epub 2018 Feb 3. PubMed 29548882 ↗
  • Roberts GP, Larraufie P, Richards P, Kay RG, Galvin SG, Miedzybrodzka EL, Leiter A, Li HJ, Glass LL, Ma MKL, Lam B, Yeo GSH, Scharfmann R, Chiarugi D, Hardwick RH, Reimann F, Gribble FM. Comparison of Human and Murine Enteroendocrine Cells by Transcriptomic and Peptidomic Profiling. Diabetes. 2019 May;68(5):1062-1072. doi: 10.2337/db18-0883. Epub 2019 Feb 7. PubMed 30733330 ↗
  • Larraufie P, Roberts GP, McGavigan AK, Kay RG, Li J, Leiter A, Melvin A, Biggs EK, Ravn P, Davy K, Hornigold DC, Yeo GSH, Hardwick RH, Reimann F, Gribble FM. Important Role of the GLP-1 Axis for Glucose Homeostasis after Bariatric Surgery. Cell Rep. 2019 Feb 5;26(6):1399-1408.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.047. PubMed 30726726 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2017 to primary completion in Mar 2019, 26 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 13, 2016
First posted
Jul 19, 2016
StartActual
Jan 2017
Primary completionActual
Mar 11, 2019
CompletionActual
Mar 11, 2019
Last update
Apr 2, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02836353
Responsible party
Geoffrey Roberts (Clinical Research Associate, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 19, 2016
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Mar 11, 2019
Completion
Mar 11, 2019
Last update
Apr 2, 2019

Study contacts

Geoffrey P Roberts, MA BM BCh
principal investigator · University of Cambridge
Fiona M Gribble, PhD
principal investigator · University of Cambridge

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Somatostatin · Rifaximin

Start the discussion