CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02831166ARISE-2Updated Feb 11, 2020

Vascular Closure Device Versus Transradial Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

A Phase 4 interventional study of Transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention and Transfemoral primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Myocardial Infarction, Complications; Device, Vascular and Injury of Radial Artery, sponsored by Irmandade Santa Casa Misericórdia Marília. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-11.

Sponsored by Irmandade Santa Casa Misericórdia Marília · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered Jul 2016).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention represents the gold standard for the treatment of ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction. However, periprocedural bleedings are associated with an increased risk of mortality, re-infarction, and stroke. Although the prognostic value of access site related bleeding complications is still debated, transradial approach is associated with better short-term outcomes and reduced hospital stay as compared to transfemoral approach. The investigators aimed to compare transradial approach with transfemoral approach with systematic achievement of hemostasis by the implantation of a vascular closure device in a national multicentre randomized clinical trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Complications; Device, Vascular
  • Injury of Radial Artery
  • Injury; Blood Vessel, Femoral, Artery

Keywords

  • Vascular closure devices
  • Transradial approach
  • Transfemoral approach
03

In context

Myocardial Infarction

2,744 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 418 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 250 is above the median of 148 across 1,595 interventional studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.

Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

Irmandade Santa Casa Misericórdia Marília is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction patients during the first 12 hours of sympton onset;
  • Intention to perform primary percutaneous coronary intervention;
  • Signed informed consent;
  • Patient eligible for transradial and transfemoral primary percutaneous coronary intervention, being pre-requisites: (a) familiarity of the operator with the radial and femoral techniques using vascular closure devices, (b) agreement of the operator to use the access route determined by the randomization process.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years of age;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Chronic use of vitamin K antagonists or direct thrombin inhibitors, or oral Xa-factor antagonists;
  • Hypersensitivity to antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant drugs;
  • Active bleeding or high bleeding risk (severe liver failure, active peptic ulcer, creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min, platelets count \< 100.000 mm3);
  • Uncontrolled systemic hypertension;
  • Cardiogenic shock;
  • Previous myocardial revascularization surgery with ≥ 1 internal mammary or radial artery graft;
  • Documented chronic peripheral arterial disease preventing the use of the femoral technique;
  • Severe concomitant disease with life expectancy below 12 months;
  • Participation in drug or devices investigative clinical trials in the last 30 days;
  • Medical, geographic or social conditions impairing the participation in the study or inability to understand and sign the informed consent term.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Transradial approach

    Transradial approach primary percutaneous coronary intervention using the TR Band device to obtain hemostasis (n=125).

    Procedure: Transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention

  • Active comparator
    Transfemoral approach

    Transfemoral approach primary percutaneous coronary intervention using a vascular closure device to obtain hemostasis (n=125).

    Procedure: Transfemoral primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Interventions

  • ProcedureTransradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention

    Transradial coronary angiography will be performed by the Judkins technique using 6 French diameter sheaths and pre-molded catheters for selective catheterization of left and right coronary arteries. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent deployment will be indicated when a culprit lesion is identified, with high probability of angiographic success, being ideally performed immediately after coronary angiography Procedures will be performed according to recommendations of current guidelines. To achieve hemostasis in the transradial approach, a radial compression device will be applied, to maintain patent antegrade flow.

  • ProcedureTransfemoral primary percutaneous coronary intervention

    Transfemoral coronary angiography will be performed by the Judkins technique using 6 French diameter sheaths and pre-molded catheters for selective catheterization of left and right coronary arteries. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent deployment will be indicated when a culprit lesion is identified, with high probability of angiographic success, being ideally performed immediately after coronary angiography Procedures will be performed according to recommendations of current guidelines. A vascular closure device will be used to achieve hemostasis in the transfemoral approach, preceded by systematic performance of femoral angiography and maintaining absolute bed rest for 60 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Major vascular access site complications

    Major vascular complications related to arterial access site will be evaluated during hospitalization by physical examination and duplex ultrassonography and include major bleeding, retroperitoneal hemorrhage, compartment syndrome, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, limb ischemia or need for vascular surgery repair.

    Time frame: 48 hours post-procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Device success

    The success of the device is defined as the attainment of adequate hemostasis at the end of the procedure, without the need to apply other compression methods.

    Time frame: 48 hours post-procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pedro Beraldo de Andrade
    Marília, São Paulo 17515900, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • de Andrade PB, E Mattos LA, Tebet MA, Rinaldi FS, Esteves VC, Nogueira EF, Franca JI, de Andrade MV, Barbosa RA, Labrunie A, Abizaid AA, Sousa AG. Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients. Trials. 2013 Dec 18;14:435. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-435. PubMed 24345099 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02831166
Lead sponsor
Irmandade Santa Casa Misericórdia Marília
Responsible party
Pedro Beraldo de Andrade (MD, phD, Irmandade Santa Casa Misericórdia Marília) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 13, 2016
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Oct 2019
Completion
Nov 2019
Last update
Feb 11, 2020

Study contacts

Pedro B Andrade, phD
principal investigator · Irmandade SCMM

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion