CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02805179Updated Apr 15, 2021Results posted

A Study of High-Dose Chemoradiation Using Biologically-Based Target Volume Definition in Patients With Glioblastoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of High Dose Radiation and Temozolomide in Glioma, sponsored by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-15.

Sponsored by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a study to determine the safety and effectiveness of high-dose radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Read the detailed description

After analysis demonstrated the improved prognostic value of identifying both hypercellular tumor (TVHCV) based on high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and hyperperfused tumor (TVCBV) based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), the study was amended and later-enrolled patients boosted to both TVHCV and TVCBV.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glioma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Glioblastoma

1,920 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioblastoma; 450 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 36 across 1,618 interventional studies indexed under Glioblastoma.

Browse Glioblastoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 316 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Of its 46 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Newly diagnosed histologically-confirmed supratentorial World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV gliomas including glioblastoma multiforme and gliosarcoma
  • Age 18 or older
  • Karnofsky performance status (a measure to quantify general well being and activities of daily life; scale ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is perfect health) of greater than or equal to 70
  • Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
  • Adequate bone marrow reserve (hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10, absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 1500, platelets greater than or equal to 100,000); acceptable liver function (total bilirubin less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dl, ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase)/AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase) less than or equal to 5 times the normal range); acceptable renal function (serum creatinine less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dl). Eligibility level for hemoglobin may be reached by transfusion.
  • Maximal contiguous volume of tumor based on high b-value diffusion MRI \< 1/3 volume of brain
  • Patients must be registered within 6 weeks of most recent resection.
  • Patients must have signed a study-specific informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent glioma, or tumor involving the brainstem or cerebellum. Prior low-grade glioma without prior RT, now with malignant progression are eligible.
  • Prior use of Gliadel wafers or any other intratumoral or intracavitary treatment is not permitted. Prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable, except for Temozolomide or Bevacizumab.
  • Evidence of cerebrospinal fluid dissemination (positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology for malignancy or MRI findings consistent with CSF dissemination)
  • Evidence of severe concurrent disease requiring treatment
  • Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) unless disease-free for a minimum of 3 years (for example, carcinoma in situ of breast, oral cavity or cervix are all permissible)
  • Patients unable to undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging exams (MRI) (i.e. patients with non-compatible devices such as cardiac pacemakers, other implanted electronic devices, metallic prostheses, or ferromagnetic prostheses (e.g. pins in artificial joints and surgical pins/clips) or unable to receive gadolinium for MRI, as per the standard UM Department of Radiology MRI screening criteria)
  • Patients treated with previous cranial or head/neck radiotherapy leading to radiation field overlap
  • Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 14 days prior to registration. Patients with reproductive potential must agree to use an effective contraceptive method during treatment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High Dose Chemoradiation

    Patients will receive high dose radiation based in part on advanced imaging, and concurrent temozolomide. Four weeks after the completion of chemoradiation, patients will receive adjuvant temozolomide.

    Radiation: High Dose Radiation · Drug: Temozolomide

Interventions

  • RadiationHigh Dose Radiation

    Radiation will be delivered once daily for a total of 30 fractions, five days per week.

  • DrugTemozolomide

    Patients will receive concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m\^2 daily for 6 weeks). Adjuvant temozolomide will be given at 150-200 mg/m\^2, D1-5 every 28 days for a minimum of six cycles and will be started approximately four weeks following completion of radiotherapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival at 12 Months

    Percentage of patients alive at 12 months after completion of chemoradiation

    Time frame: 12 months after completion of chemoradiation

  2. Median Overall Survival

    Median overall survival in months

    Time frame: Median follow-up time was 26 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Median Progression-free Survival

    From start of RT until disease progression or death, or until date of last imaging follow-up, estimated using Kaplan-Meier. Progression is defined by any of the following: \>= 25% increase in sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions (compared with baseline if no decrease) on stable or increasing doses of corticosteroids; a significant increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesions on stable or increasing doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan or best response after initiation of therapy, not due to comorbid events; appearance of any new lesions; clear progression of non-measurable lesions; or definite clinical deterioration not attributable to causes other than tumor, or to decrease in corticosteroid dose. When pathologic confirmation was unavailable, progression was defined as worsening enhancement based on imaging with or without adjunctive advanced imaging including perfusion MRI or magnetic resonance spectroscopy, when clinically indicated.

    Time frame: Median follow-up time was 26 months

  2. Median Change in Tumor Volume From Baseline to Mid-radiation Treatment (Week 4)

    Tumor volume will be measured by diffusion MRI and perfusion MRI before treatment start and at mid-treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

  3. Percentage of Patients That Experienced Deterioration in Quality of Life (QOL)

    Percentage of patients that experienced deterioration in QOL per the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and other (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of physical functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 and 7 months

  4. Percentage of Patients With Failure; Central or In-field vs. Marginal or Distant

    Failures will be classified as central or in-field, marginal or distant based on previously published criteria. 1) "central," in which 95% or more of the recurrent tumor volume (Vrecur) was within D95, the region treated to high dose (95% of the prescription dose); 2) "in-field," in which 80% or more of Vrecur was within the D95 isodose surface; 3) "marginal," when between 20 and 80% of Vrecur was inside the D95 surface; 4) "outside," in which less than 20% of Vrecur was inside the D95 surface.

    Time frame: Median 26 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 15, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Participants
Started26
Eligible patients that started dose-intensified chemo-radiation23
Subset of participants, boosted to both high b-value diffusion and perfusion13
Completed23
Not completed3

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Survival at 12 Months

Percentage of patients alive at 12 months after completion of chemoradiation

Time frame:
12 months after completion of chemoradiation
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Survival at 12 Months
percentage of participantsHigh Dose Chemoradiation
all eligible patients who completed dose-intensified chemo-radiation74 (56 to 92)
only patients who were boosted to both diffusion and perfusion92 (78 to 100)
Statistical analysis
  • High Dose Chemoradiation · 1-sided binomial test · p = 0.03
PrimaryMedian Overall Survival

Median overall survival in months

Time frame:
Median follow-up time was 26 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Median Overall Survival
monthsHigh Dose Chemoradiation
all eligible patients who completed dose-intensified chemo-radiation20 (14 to 29)
only patients who were boosted to both diffusion and perfusion20 (18 to NA)
SecondaryMedian Progression-free Survival

From start of RT until disease progression or death, or until date of last imaging follow-up, estimated using Kaplan-Meier. Progression is defined by any of the following: \>= 25% increase in sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions (compared with baseline if no decrease) on stable or increasing doses of corticosteroids; a significant increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesions on stable or increasing doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan or best response after initiation of therapy, not due to comorbid events; appearance of any new lesions; clear progression of non-measurable lesions; or definite clinical deterioration not attributable to causes other than tumor, or to decrease in corticosteroid dose. When pathologic confirmation was unavailable, progression was defined as worsening enhancement based on imaging with or without adjunctive advanced imaging including perfusion MRI or magnetic resonance spectroscopy, when clinically indicated.

Time frame:
Median follow-up time was 26 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Median Progression-free Survival
monthsHigh Dose Chemoradiation
all eligible patients who completed dose-intensified chemo-radiation10 (7 to 17)
only patients who were boosted to both diffusion and perfusion12 (10 to 17)
SecondaryMedian Change in Tumor Volume From Baseline to Mid-radiation Treatment (Week 4)

Tumor volume will be measured by diffusion MRI and perfusion MRI before treatment start and at mid-treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 4
Reported as:
Median · cubic centimeters
Median Change in Tumor Volume From Baseline to Mid-radiation Treatment (Week 4)
cubic centimetersHigh Dose Chemoradiation
Median Change in Tumor Volume From Baseline to Mid-radiation Treatment (Week 4)-2.9 (-5.3 to -1.8)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients That Experienced Deterioration in Quality of Life (QOL)

Percentage of patients that experienced deterioration in QOL per the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and other (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of physical functioning.

Time frame:
Baseline to 1 and 7 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients That Experienced Deterioration in Quality of Life (QOL)
percentage of participantsHigh Dose Chemoradiation
at 1 month26
at 7 months33
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Failure; Central or In-field vs. Marginal or Distant

Failures will be classified as central or in-field, marginal or distant based on previously published criteria. 1) "central," in which 95% or more of the recurrent tumor volume (Vrecur) was within D95, the region treated to high dose (95% of the prescription dose); 2) "in-field," in which 80% or more of Vrecur was within the D95 isodose surface; 3) "marginal," when between 20 and 80% of Vrecur was inside the D95 surface; 4) "outside," in which less than 20% of Vrecur was inside the D95 surface.

Time frame:
Median 26 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Failure; Central or In-field vs. Marginal or Distant
percentage of participantsHigh Dose Chemoradiation
central or in-field31
non-central/non-in-field (marginal or distant)69

Adverse events

Collected over Time frame for toxicity was from the time of the initial intervention through 30 days following the completion of radiation therapy. Subacute and late neurologic toxicity beyond 30 days was assessed every 2 to 3 months, and all patients were monitored for late neurologic toxicity until last follow-up or death. The median follow-up time was 26 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Enrolled Patients21/26 (80.8%)8/26 (30.8%)25/26 (96.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAll Enrolled Patients
Nervous system disorders - OtherNervous system disorders2/26
ConfusionPsychiatric disorders2/26
Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders2/26
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/26
Localized edemaGeneral disorders1/26
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations1/26
Wound infectionInfections and infestations1/26
Muscle weakness left-sidedMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/26
Muscle weakness right-sidedMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/26
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/26
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 83
Most frequent other events
EventAll Enrolled Patients
FatigueGeneral disorders20/26
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders11/26
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders9/26
HeadacheNervous system disorders8/26
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations7/26
DizzinessNervous system disorders7/26
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders7/26
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders6/26
General disorders and administration site conditions - OtherGeneral disorders5/26
PainGeneral disorders5/26

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)High Dose Chemoradiation
Mean62 (50 to 77)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)High Dose Chemoradiation
Female10
Male16
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)High Dose Chemoradiation
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino26
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)High Dose Chemoradiation
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White24
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Michigan Hospital
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee SW, Fraass BA, Marsh LH, Herbort K, Gebarski SS, Martel MK, Radany EH, Lichter AS, Sandler HM. Patterns of failure following high-dose 3-D conformal radiotherapy for high-grade astrocytomas: a quantitative dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jan 1;43(1):79-88. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00266-1. PubMed 9989517 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 5, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02805179
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 17, 2016
Start date
Sep 22, 2016
Primary completion
Feb 6, 2020
Completion
Nov 18, 2020
Results posted
Apr 15, 2021
Last update
Apr 15, 2021

Study contacts

Michelle Kim, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion