CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02802579Updated Jun 17, 2016

ECG Triggered Dual Source CT for Non-invasive Pre-operative Cardiac Imaging in Morbid Obese Patients

An interventional study of standard protocol and enhanced protocol in Obesity, Morbid, sponsored by Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-17.

Sponsored by Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Coronary arterial disease is a risk factor for bariatric surgery and might be a predictor for later major adverse coronary events. Diagnosis of coronary arterial disease would thus be desirable for obese patients, however percutaneous angiography is an invasive procedure and associated with a certain morbidity in obese patients. In this study the investigators would like to assess whether dual source CT angiography can be used for diagnosis of coronary arterial disease in severely obese patients and which settings yield the best image quality.

Read the detailed description

Obesity is a major health problem in many countries and a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Extreme obesity can be treated with surgery, however these procedures are associated with a certain surgery-related morbidity which increases with comorbidities, in particular coronary diseases. Thus, preoperative cardiac risk assessment would be desirable, however percutaneous coronary angiography is an invasive procedure with problems and complications in obese patients. A non-invasive alternative would be coronary dual-.source CT angiography (CCTA), however little experience exists in the application of CCTA in morbid obese patients. This study would like to address the following issues:

  1. Comparison of image quality of coronary CT angiography using a dual source CT from obese patients using a special protocol (140 kV, 350 mAs) with images from historical controls from normal weight patients with a standard protocol (120 kV, 330 mAs).
  2. Prediction of major adverse coronary events. Patients with a coronary stenosis in CCTA will be followed for any major adverse coronary events (details see Outcomes)
  3. Is it possible to detect myocardial fat by a reduced CT density. Images from obese patients will be compared to historical controls from normal patients. Furthermore, is the myocardial CT density correlated with the BMI of obese patients?
  4. Optimisation of scan protocol. Increasing the scanning angle beyond the standard 90° will reduce the signal noise at the cost of temporal resolution. Various scanning angles with be tested for an optimal combination of signal noise and temporal resolution.
  5. Does the long QT-syndrome improve after bariatric surgery? It is assumed that the long QT-syndrome is a consequence of fattening of the myocardia. Is it possible to see a reduction of myocardial fattening and thus an improvement of the long QT-syndrome with CT during the follow-up after bariatric surgery?
02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity, Morbid

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • obesity
  • dual source CT
  • coronary CT angiography
  • prognosis
  • bariatric surgery
  • gastric bypass surgery
  • coronary arterial disease
  • major adverse coronary event
03

In context

Obesity, Morbid

922 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity, Morbid; 172 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is above the median of 60 across 590 interventional studies indexed under Obesity, Morbid.

Browse Obesity, Morbid studies →

Lead sponsor

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen is the lead sponsor of 79 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • morbid obesity (BMI >35 kg/m²)
  • intention to undergo bariatric surgery
  • increased risk for coronary artery disease (based on PROCAM score)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • kidney insufficiency (serum creatinine >100 µmol/l, creatinine clearance \<50 ml/min)
  • allergy to iodine containing contrast agents
  • hyperthyroidism
  • metformin medication
  • pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A: standard protocol

    Standard dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography protocol

    Radiation: standard protocol

  • Experimental
    B: enhanced protocol

    enhanced dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography protocol

    Radiation: enhanced protocol

  • Experimental
    C: enhanced obesity protocol

    enhanced obesity-mode dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography protocol

    Radiation: enhanced obesity protocol

Interventions

  • Radiationstandard protocol

    tube voltage: 120 kV current time product: 350 mAs/rotation rotation: 90° (with two detectors in a 90° angle)

    Also known as: dual source computed tomography coronary angiography

  • Radiationenhanced protocol

    tube voltage: 140 kV current time product: 350 mAs/rotation rotation: 90° (with two detectors in a 90° angle)

    Also known as: dual source computed tomography coronary angiography

  • Radiationenhanced obesity protocol

    tube voltage: 140 kV current time product: 350 mAs/rotation rotation: 180° (with two detectors in a 90° angle)

    Also known as: dual source computed tomography coronary angiography

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Image quality

    Coronary arteries (with at least 1 mm diameter at their origin) were segmented according to the 15-segment model of the American Heart Association (Austen 1975). Subjective image quality was judged for each coronary artery segment on a 4-point scale (Leschka 2007) : 1. = excellent; 2. = good, minor artifacts; 3. = fair, moderate artifacts but still diagnostic; 4. = non-diagnostic

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. coronary artery stenosis

    Significant coronary artery stenosis was defined as more than 50% narrowing of luminal diameter. Stenosis assessment was performed by a radiologist not involved in image quality assessment.

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Image noise

    Image noise was determined as the standard deviation of the attenuation value in a region of 1 sq cm that was placed in the ascending aorta. The average of the attenuation in the left and right coronary artery were used for further calculations.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

    SNR was determined by dividing mean attenuation by image noise

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)

    Vessel contrast was calculated as the difference in the mean attenuation (in Hounsfield units) between the contrast-enhanced vessel lumen and the mean attenuation in the adjacent perivascular tissue. Attenuations were measured in a region in the proximal segment of the right coronary artery and in the left main artery, and were defined as large as possible, whereas avoiding calcifications and plaques. CNR was calculated as vessel contrast divided by image noise (Husmann 2006, Lembcke 2004).

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)

    Any of the following events: * death * non fatal myocardial infarction * late revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention * coronary artery bypass grafting

    Time frame: 7 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cantonal Hospital St Gallen
    St. Gallen, 9007, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975 Apr;51(4 Suppl):5-40. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.4.5. No abstract available. PubMed 1116248 ↗
  • Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Plass A, Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Husmann L, Flohr TG, Genoni M, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, Alkadhi H. Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol. 2007 Aug;42(8):543-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31803b93cf. PubMed 17620936 ↗
  • Husmann L, Alkadhi H, Boehm T, Leschka S, Schepis T, Koepfli P, Desbiolles L, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, Wildermuth S. Influence of cardiac hemodynamic parameters on coronary artery opacification with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2006 May;16(5):1111-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0110-4. Epub 2006 Jan 28. PubMed 16607499 ↗
  • Lembcke A, Wiese TH, Schnorr J, Wagner S, Mews J, Kroencke TJ, Enzweiler CN, Hamm B, Taupitz M. Image quality of noninvasive coronary angiography using multislice spiral computed tomography and electron-beam computed tomography: intraindividual comparison in an animal model. Invest Radiol. 2004 Jun;39(6):357-64. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000123316.10765.6c. PubMed 15167102 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02802579
Lead sponsor
Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Responsible party
Sebastian Leschka, MD (Attending Physician, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 16, 2016
Start date
Dec 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Last update
Jun 17, 2016

Study contacts

Sebastian Leschka, MD
principal investigator · Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion