An observational study in Malnutrition, sponsored by University of Waterloo. Completed. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-05.
Sponsored by University of Waterloo · Observational
M3 is a multi-site cross sectional study. Data were collected form 640 residents in 32 homes in Canada. The primary purpose of this study was to identify food intake in residents and compare this to recommendations, as well as determine influential determinants of food intake.
This cross-sectional study has collected in-depth data at the resident, dining room, staff, and home level, focused on determinants of food intake. Dietary intake is based on three non-consecutive days of weighed and estimated food intake. Oral health and dyshphagia risk are assessed. Person directed care practices, mealtime environments and home level variables of food cost, production and delivery are ascertained.
1,587 studies on the registry are indexed under Malnutrition; 237 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 640 is above the median of 203 across 388 observational studies indexed under Malnutrition.
Browse Malnutrition studies →University of Waterloo is the lead sponsor of 90 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Participants were residents in long term care. Eligible residents were medically stable, living in the selected units from the participating homes. They had to be reside in the home for more than 1 month and not be on tube feeding or be considered at the end of life.
Exclusion Criteria:
Malnutrition
Subjective Global Assessment
Time frame: 1 month
No study locations are listed for this record.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Waterloo