ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02794987Updated Dec 21, 2016

Cholangioscopic Classification of Bile Duct Lesions

An observational study in Bile Duct Lesions, sponsored by Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas. Completed at 1 site in Ecuador. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-12-21.

Sponsored by Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
130
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure, however it has an important image limitation. The fluoroscopic cholangiography shows the biliary tree in a two-dimensional view. When an indeterminate biliary stricture is seen, the certainly diagnosis by ERCP depends on a blind biopsy sampling with the risk of missed pathology and sampling errors. SpyGlass® System (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) is a cholangioscope that enables single-operator, direct visualization of the pancreatico-biliary system and the evaluation of intraductal lesions. It has a digital sensor with 4x resolution and a 1.2 mm working channel that allows the passage of the SpyBite® Forceps biopsy. It has been demonstrated that the use of SpyGlass® System and SpyBite® Forceps changes clinical management in 64% of patients. It has a sensitivity of 76.5% for indeterminate stricture diagnosis, compared to 29.4% and 5.9% sensitivity using blind biopsy brushing catheter respectively. Although it has been described before cholangioscopic images of malignant biliary lesions like an irregular lesion surface with irregular vessels and bleeding or a smooth surface without vessels for benign lesions, there is no current validated classification that allows unify the diagnostic criteria.

Methods: Study design: The study was design to be performed in 2 stages. Stage 1: observational, retrospective study with case collection from September 2013 to September 2015. Patients included had bile duct tissular lesion detected by POCS. The images were correlated to histopathology and 6 month follows up and a classification was finally performed to differentiate benign forma malignant bile duct lesions. Stage 2: patients with bile duct tissular lesion detected by POCS, will be the evaluated in a prospective, non-randomized and double blind manner. Two groups of endoscopist will evaluate the images but only one group will do it using the classification previously performed. Second stage case collection has already started (December 2015) and will include patients until December 2016.

  • Endpoint Classification: Efficacy
  • Intervention Model: Non interventional
  • Primary Purpose: Diagnosis
Read the detailed description

Setting: Gastroenterology division of the Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases (IECED), OmniHospital Academic Tertiary Center. The study protocol and consent form has been approved by the Institutional Review Board and will be conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki. Patients will sign an informed consent.

Population selection:

Stage 1: 63 patients enrolled with bile duct tissular lesion detected by POCS. Cholangioscopic lesions images (315) were photographically recorded in order to correlate to, histopathology after targeted or surgical biopsies, and 6 months follow up with POCS. Using the histopathology results, the lesions were classified into benign or malignant. An experienced endoscopist with more than 140 POCS analyzed the images based on the morphological and vascular pattern and performed a POCS macroscopic classification of tissular bile duct lesions as follow: Benign lesions: Type 1 "Villous pattern" (micronodular or villous pattern without vascularity), Type 2 "Polypoid pattern" (adenoma or granuloma pattern without vascularity) and Type 3 "Inflammatory pattern" (regular or irregular fibrous and congestive pattern with regular vascularity). Malignant lesions: Type 1 "Flat pattern" (flat and smooth or irregular surface with irregular or spider vascularity); Type 2 "Polypoid pattern" (polypoid or mass shape with fibrosis and irregular or spider vascularity), Type 3 "Ulcerated pattern" (irregular ulcerated and infiltrative pattern with or without fibrosis and with irregular or spider vascularity) and type 4 "honey-comb pattern" (fibrous honey-comb pattern with or without irregular or spider vascularity).

Stage 2: estimated enrollment of 100 patients with bile duct tissular lesion detected by POCS. Patients included will be analyzed by two groups of endoscopists. One group (classification group) will use the previous classification to select the images as benign or malignant with the different subtypes; and the second group (no classification group or control group) will do it without using the classification.

Endoscopic technique:

Stage 1: patients included were evaluated using a standard duodenoscope (Pentax ED 3670TK, Hoya Co.), the Pentax Video Processor EPK-i5010 and both SpyGlass® cholangioscopes: First generation, SpyGlass® Direct Visualization System and Second generation, Digital SpyGlass® DS System (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) in a mother-baby manner. Procedures were performed by one experienced endoscopists with more than 300 ERCP/year (C.R.M), in the supine position and under general anesthesia. All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. Biopsies were taken in order to correlate to histopathology.

Stage 2: patients will be evaluated using a standard duodenoscope (Pentax ED 3670TK, Hoya Co.), the Pentax Video Processor EPK-i7010 and second generation, Digital SpyGlass® DS System (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) in a mother-baby manner. Procedures will be performed by two experienced endoscopists with more than 300 ERCP/year (C.R.M and M.S.A), in the supine position and under general anesthesia. Half of patients will receive antibiotic prophylaxis because an ongoing cholangioscopic antibiotic prophylaxis protocol. Biopsies will be taken in order to correlate to histopathology.

Inter and intra-observer agreement Stage 1: A data set containing 40 random photographs of the bile duct lesions were presented to 1 expert and 2 non-experts in POCS, whom analyzed the images blindly. Intra and inter-observer reproducibility was measure based on comparison of images between endoscopists.

Stage 2: Intra and inter-observer agreement will be performed in the same manner as stage1.

Statistical analysis: Baseline characteristics will be compared between groups using Chi-square o Fisher Test for categorical variable and Mann-Whitney Test for continuing variables. Accuracy, sensitive, specificity, positive and negative predicts value will be calculated. To examine inter and intra observer agreement, kappa values will be calculated. A P value of less than 0.05 is considered to be statistically significant. All the statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software suite v.22.

Limitations: the protocol will be performed in only one center.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bile Duct Lesions

Keywords

  • Bile duct
  • indeterminate stricture
  • cholangioscopy
  • Spyglass
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Stage 1: 63 patients enrolled with bile duct tissular lesion detected by POCS. Cholangioscopic lesions images (315) were compared to histopathology results and 6 months follow up with POCS, and an experienced endoscopist with more than 140 POCS performed a POCS macroscopic classification of tissular bile duct lesions, based on the morphological and vascular pattern.

Stage 2: estimated enrollment of 100 patients with bile duct tissular lesion detected by POCS. Patients included will be analyzed by two groups of endoscopists. One group (action group) will use the previous classification to select the images as benign or malignant with the different subtypes; and the second group (control group) will do it without using the classification.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Above 18 years old patients
  • Who agree to participate in the study
  • Patients with tissular biliary lesions detected by POCS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tissular lesions with no histology confirmation (either biopsy or surgical resection in case of malignancy suspicion) or 6 months follow-up by POCS (in case of benign suspicion)
  • Severe uncontrolled coagulopathy
  • Esophageal, gastric or duodenal stenosing tumors with no possibility of scope passage
  • Prior history of esophageal, gastric or surgery with no possibility of scope passage
  • Contrast allergy
  • Pregnancy and lactation
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
130 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Classification group

    Group of endoscopists that will use the previous classification to select the bile duct tissular lesion images detected by SpyGlass® choledoscopy as benign or malignant with the different subtypes

    Device: SpyGlass® choledoscopy

  • No classification group

    Group of endoscopists that will classified the bile duct tissular lesion images detected by SpyGlass® choledoscopy as benign or malignant with the different subtypes without using the classification.

    Device: SpyGlass® choledoscopy

Interventions

  • DeviceSpyGlass® choledoscopy

    Stage 1: patients included were evaluated using a standard duodenoscope and both SpyGlass® cholangioscopes: First generation, SpyGlass® Direct Visualization System and Second generation, Digital SpyGlass® DS System (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) Procedures were performed by one experienced endoscopists with more than 300 ERCP/year (C.R.M). Biopsies were taken in order to correlate to histopathology. Stage 2: patients will be evaluated using a standard duodenoscope and second generation, Digital SpyGlass® DS System (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA). Procedures will be performed by two experienced endoscopists with more than 300 ERCP/year (C.R.M and M.S.A). Biopsies will be taken in order to correlate to histopathology.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of vascular and surface features of benign and malignant lesions detected by POCS images, that could be used to perform a macroscopic classification of bile duct tissular lesions

    Vascular and surface features were analyzed using POCS images of bile duct lesions and were correlated to histopathology and 6 month follows up. Finally a classification differenciating benign from malignant bile duct lesions, was performed.

    Time frame: 24 month

  2. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the macroscopic classification will be measure in order to perform a prospective validation of the classification.

    The images of bile duct lesions will be evaluated by two groups of endoscopists but only one will do it using the previously designed classification. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value will be measure and compared between groups.

    Time frame: 12 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas, Omnihospital
    Guayaquil, Guayas 090505, Ecuador
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Seelhoff A, Schumacher B, Neuhaus H. Single operator peroral cholangioscopic guided therapy of bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011 May;18(3):346-9. doi: 10.1007/s00534-010-0360-7. PubMed 21480000 ↗
  • Tieu AH, Kumbhari V, Jakhete N, Onyimba F, Patel Y, Shin EJ, Li Z. Diagnostic and therapeutic utility of SpyGlass((R)) peroral cholangioscopy in intraductal biliary disease: single-center, retrospective, cohort study. Dig Endosc. 2015 May;27(4):479-485. doi: 10.1111/den.12405. Epub 2014 Dec 11. PubMed 25394296 ↗
  • Draganov PV, Lin T, Chauhan S, Wagh MS, Hou W, Forsmark CE. Prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of ERCP-guided cholangiopancreatoscopy with a new direct visualization system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):971-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Mar 17. PubMed 21419408 ↗
  • Chen YK, Parsi MA, Binmoeller KF, Hawes RH, Pleskow DK, Slivka A, Haluszka O, Petersen BT, Sherman S, Deviere J, Meisner S, Stevens PD, Costamagna G, Ponchon T, Peetermans JA, Neuhaus H. Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):805-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.016. Epub 2011 Jul 18. PubMed 21762903 ↗
  • Draganov PV, Chauhan S, Wagh MS, Gupte AR, Lin T, Hou W, Forsmark CE. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: a prospective, long-term follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.020. PubMed 22248602 ↗
  • Robles-Medranda C, Valero M, Soria-Alcivar M, Puga-Tejada M, Oleas R, Ospina-Arboleda J, Alvarado-Escobar H, Baquerizo-Burgos J, Robles-Jara C, Pitanga-Lukashok H. Reliability and accuracy of a novel classification system using peroral cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of bile duct lesions. Endoscopy. 2018 Nov;50(11):1059-1070. doi: 10.1055/a-0607-2534. Epub 2018 Jun 28. PubMed 29954008 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 2015, a primary completion of Dec 2016 and a completion of Dec 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 1, 2016
First posted
Jun 9, 2016
Start
Dec 2015
Primary completionActual
Dec 2016
CompletionActual
Dec 2016
Last update
Dec 21, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 21, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02794987
Lead sponsor
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 9, 2016
Start date
Dec 2015
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Last update
Dec 21, 2016

Study contacts

Carlos A Robles-Medranda, MD
principal investigator · Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion