An interventional study of Group 2a. Telemedicine program and Group 1a. Control in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, sponsored by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud. Completed. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-13.
Sponsored by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease of high socio-health relevance for their clinical and economic implications (risk of complications, disability ...) (healthcare costs). Strict glycemic control and intensive treatment and support have shown long-term patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) improved health. The intensive insulin therapy involves the administration of insulin through 3 or more injections per day (MDI), or through a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). New technologies applied to the treatment of DM1, such as telemedicine, could bring benefits to patients. The available scientific evidence to date shows that telemedicine systems have beneficial or neutral effects on glycemic control, expressed in terms of HbA1c in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with MDI or CSII. They have also shown not to worsen the quality of life and reduce the costs associated with the care of these subjects. However, studies published to date are generally short follow-up, small sample size, and have not evaluated other biological parameters such as glycemic variability, inflammatory markers and markers of oxidative stress as well as a psychological assessment including depression, anxiety, Diabetes-related distress and fear of hypoglycemia. It has been designed a randomized crossover 18 months in order to study the effect of a telemedicine program in a group of subjects with DM1 in CSII on clinical variables of metabolic control variables, including parameters of glycemic variability, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, psychological variables and quality of life, and associated costs.
Randomized crossover clinical trial about the impact of a telemedicine program (Emminens Conecta® System, Roche Diagnostics SL) vs. the conventional medical follow-face of 18 months for the care of patients with DM1 intensive treatment with CSII (Accu-Chek Spirit®, Roche SL).
Two groups: one group with interactive clinical monitoring through a telemedicine platform (TM) and other conventional medical follow-up group (SMC) during 6 months. Being a crossover trial, both groups passing through both conditions (TM and SMC) during 6 months.
10,926 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 80 across 8,368 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.
Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud is the lead sponsor of 71 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Treatment with CSII (Accu-Chek Spirit®) and follow-face doctor visits (conventional treatment -SMC-) (6 months).
Other: Group 1a. Control
CSII (Accu-Chek Spirit®) and medical monitoring via telematics application (Emminens Conecta® System, Roche Diagnostics SL) (TM) (6 months).
Other: Group 2a. Telemedicine program
After a washout period of 3 months and the crossing, Group 1 begins with medical monitoring via telematics application (Emminens Conecta® System, Roche Diagnostics SL) (TM) (6 months).
Other: Group 1b.Telemedicine program
After a washout period of 3 months and the crossing, Group 2 begins with face doctor visits (conventional treatment -SMC-) (6 months).
Other: Group 2b. Control
CSII (Accu-Chek Spirit®) and medical monitoring via telematics application (Emminens Conecta® System, Roche Diagnostics SL) (TM) (6 months).
Treatment with CSII (Accu-Chek Spirit®) and follow-face doctor visits (conventional treatment -SMC-) (6 months).
After a washout period of 3 months and the crossing, Group 1 begins with medical monitoring via telematics application (Emminens Conecta® System, Roche Diagnostics SL) (TM) (6 months).
After a washout period of 3 months and the crossing, Group 2 begins with face doctor visits (conventional treatment -SMC-) (6 months) .
Assessment of clinical and metabolic parameters (glycosylated hemoglobin-HbA1c- and glycemic variability-SD-).
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of clinical and metabolic parameters (glycosylated hemoglobin-HbA1c- and glycemic variability-SD-).
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of inflammatory markers (hs-CRP).
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of inflammatory markers (IL-6).
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of inflammatory markers (TNF-α).
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of inflammatory markers (MCP-1).
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of inflammatory markers (hs-CRP).
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of inflammatory markers (IL-6).
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of inflammatory markers (TNF-α).
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of inflammatory markers (MCP-1).
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of redox markers (CAT).
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of redox markers (TBARS).
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of redox markers (oxidized LDL).
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of redox markers (CAT).
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of redox markers (TBARS).
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of redox markers (oxidized LDL).
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of quality of life with the DQOL
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of quality of life with the DQOL
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of depression with the BDI-II
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of depression with the BDI-II
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of anxiety with the STAI
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of anxiety with the STAI
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of distress related to diabetes with the DDS
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of distress related to diabetes with the DDS
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of treatment satisfaction with the DTSQ
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of treatment satisfaction with the DTSQ
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of fear of hypoglycemia with the FH-15
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of fear of hypoglycemia with the FH-15
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of cost-effectiveness with a structured interview designed by our research group of direct and indirect costs.
Time frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2; 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of cost-effectiveness with a structured interview designed by our research group of direct and indirect costs.
Time frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud