CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02784132Updated May 4, 2026

Video Diversion Improves Success Rate of Fundoscopic Examination in Children

An interventional study of Video diversion in Fundoscopy, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 4 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-04.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
101
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year to 4 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Fundoscopy is an important component of the neurological examination as it can detect pathologies such as high intracranial pressure. However, the exam can be challenging in uncooperative children. This study looked at whether playing a video during eye examination, improves the success, duration and ease of pediatric fundoscopy.

Read the detailed description

Fundoscopy is an important component of the neurological examination as it can detect pathologies such as high intracranial pressure. However, the exam can be challenging in uncooperative children. This study looked at whether playing a video during eye examination, improves the success, duration and ease of pediatric fundoscopy. The authors plan to recruit from 4 different clinical care settings for a total of 101 subjects. Success rate is defined as visualizing the optic disc within 60 seconds from commencement of fundoscopy. The ease of examination is determined by using a 10 point likert scale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fundoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,309 studies on the registry; 253 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 4 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • patient aged 1 to 4 years of age (inclusive) with 2 examinable eyes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who were blind, younger than 1 year of age, or older than 4 years of age
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Study Arm A

    Right eye examined first with video diversion then left eye examined without video diversion

    Other: Video diversion

  • Other
    Study Arm B

    Right eye examined first without video diversion then left eye examined with video diversion

    Other: Video diversion

  • Other
    Study Arm C

    Left eye examined first with video diversion then right eye examined without video diversion

    Other: Video diversion

  • Other
    Study Arm D

    Left eye examined first without video diversion then right eye examined with video diversion

    Other: Video diversion

Interventions

  • OtherVideo diversion

    The intervention is playing a video on a computer or iPad (using www.youtube.com) while performing fundoscopy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success rate of visualizing the optic disc within 60 seconds

    Time frame: 60 second

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time required to visualize the optic disc

    Time frame: 60 seconds

  2. Ease of performing fundoscopy

    Time frame: 60 seconds

07

Study locations

1 site
  • BC Children's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3V4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yang MMH, Singhal A, Hengel AR, Kerr JM, St-Pierre GH, George S, Muir K, Thiessen P, Enarson P. Video Diversion Improves Success Rate of Fundoscopic Examination in Children: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatr Neurol. 2018 Jun;83:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 14. PubMed 29681489 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02784132
Lead sponsor
University of British Columbia
Responsible party
Ash Singhal (principal investigator, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2016
Start date
Jun 2012
Primary completion
Jun 2014
Completion
Jun 2014
Last update
May 4, 2026

Study contacts

Ash Singhal, Dr.
principal investigator · The University of British Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion