CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02783911Updated Jun 11, 2021Results posted

Comparison of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) & Ferric Sulfate (FS) Pulpotomies

An interventional study of MTA and Ferric Sulfate in Primary Teeth and Pulpotomy, sponsored by Loma Linda University. Terminated. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-11.

Sponsored by Loma Linda University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The resident graduated.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2015, registered May 2016).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Comparison of clinical and radiographic success between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Ferric Sulfate pulpotomies for primary molars. Recall appointments are completed 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.

Read the detailed description

Comparison of clinical and radiographic success between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Ferric Sulfate pulpotomies for primary molars. Recall appointments are completed 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. Regular recall and follow up will be performed for patients who has MTA or FS pulpotomies. Clinical and radiographic findings will be recorded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Teeth
  • Pulpotomy

Keywords

  • Clinical and Radiograph
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Loma Linda University is the lead sponsor of 297 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA I,II
  • Primary Molars diagnosed with normal or reversible pulpitis with vital carious pulp exposures
  • Teeth that can have hemostasis can be achieved with pressure
  • No clinical symptoms
  • No radiographic signs of internal resorption or external root resorption

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary Molars diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis or necrotic pulp
  • Teeth that can not achieve hemostasis
  • Teeth with abscess or fistula
  • Teeth that have radiographic signs of internal resorption or external resorption
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mineral Trioxide Aggregate

    Subject with pulpotomy treated with MTA MTA paste (\< 1gm) will be placed on pulp orifice once for the life of the primary teeth

    Device: MTA

  • Experimental
    Ferric Sulfate

    Subject with pulpotomy treated with FS FS paste (\<1gm) will placed on pulp orifice once for 15 secs and removed on primary teeth

    Drug: Ferric Sulfate

Interventions

  • DeviceMTA

    Mineral Trioxide Aggregate grey paste

  • DrugFerric Sulfate

    Ferric Sulfate paste

    Also known as: FS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the Clinical Success Between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) & Ferric Sulfate (FS) Pulpotomies in Primary Molars

    At recall visits 6,9,12 months, blinded clinical examination will be completed by participating faculty members who are calibrated to clinical scaring criteria. Periapical radiographs will be taken and evaluated by 2 pediatric dentists and 1 endodontist, for presence of various pathologies. Scored based on the criteria established by Zurn and Seale 2008. Scores will be transferred to Microsoft Excel. The difference between the two materials will be analyzed using the Mann-Whiteney U test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Intra- and inter-rater agreement will be measured for radiographic assessment using Cohen's kappa test

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted Jun 11, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMineral Trioxide AggregateFerric Sulfate
Started1146
Completed814
Not completed332
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up332

Outcome measures

PrimaryComparison of the Clinical Success Between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) & Ferric Sulfate (FS) Pulpotomies in Primary Molars

At recall visits 6,9,12 months, blinded clinical examination will be completed by participating faculty members who are calibrated to clinical scaring criteria. Periapical radiographs will be taken and evaluated by 2 pediatric dentists and 1 endodontist, for presence of various pathologies. Scored based on the criteria established by Zurn and Seale 2008. Scores will be transferred to Microsoft Excel. The difference between the two materials will be analyzed using the Mann-Whiteney U test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Intra- and inter-rater agreement will be measured for radiographic assessment using Cohen's kappa test

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of units · tooth
Comparison of the Clinical Success Between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) & Ferric Sulfate (FS) Pulpotomies in Primary Molars
toothMineral Trioxide AggregateFerric Sulfate
Clinical success711
Clinical fail24
Statistical analysis
  • Mineral Trioxide Aggregate vs Ferric Sulfate · Chi-squared · p = 0.808

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
Ferric Sulfate0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

some participants has more than one tooth needs pulpotomy treatment

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Mineral Trioxide AggregateFerric SulfateTotal
<=18 years114657
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Months)Mineral Trioxide AggregateFerric SulfateTotal
Mean73.9 ± 16.981.3 ± 19.978.5 ± 18.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Mineral Trioxide AggregateFerric SulfateTotal
Female81725
Male32932
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Mineral Trioxide AggregateFerric SulfateTotal
Count of participants——0
patient has deep caries
patient has deep caries(Participants)Mineral Trioxide AggregateFerric SulfateTotal
Count of participants114657
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Asgary S, Shirvani A, Fazlyab M. MTA and ferric sulfate in pulpotomy outcomes of primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Fall;39(1):1-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.39.1.b454r616m2582373. PubMed 25631717 ↗
  • Yildirim C, Basak F, Akgun OM, Polat GG, Altun C. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Formocresol, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland Cement, and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Two Year Follow-Up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Winter;40(1):14-20. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.1.14. PubMed 26696101 ↗
  • Stringhini Junior E, Vitcel ME, Oliveira LB. Evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Aug;16(4):303-12. doi: 10.1007/s40368-015-0174-z. Epub 2015 Apr 2. PubMed 25833280 ↗
  • Frenkel G, Kaufman A, Ashkenazi M. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulpotomized primary molars treated with white or gray mineral trioxide aggregate and ferric sulfate--long-term follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 Winter;37(2):137-41. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.2.j3h27p624u163868. PubMed 23534318 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 2, 2014
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 2, 2014
  • Informed consent form · Jan 9, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02783911
Lead sponsor
Loma Linda University
Responsible party
Jung-Wei Chen, DDS, MS, PhD (Pediatric Dental Director, Loma Linda University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2016
Start date
Jan 29, 2015
Primary completion
Mar 14, 2017
Completion
Mar 14, 2017
Results posted
Jun 11, 2021
Last update
Jun 11, 2021

Study contacts

Jung-Wei Chen, DDS,MS,PhD
principal investigator · Loma Linda University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion