ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02782871Updated Mar 25, 2022

RCT: Compare - Pneupac VR1 to Manual Ventilation in Intubated Patients

An interventional study of Pneupac VR1 in Cancer, sponsored by Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-25.

Sponsored by Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was withdrawn
Sponsor decision
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Following major head and neck surgery it may be necessary to keep patients intubated and ventilated for at least 12 hours to allow the swelling associated with the operation to subside. Therefore patients (participants) are transferred to the intensive care unit anaesthetised, in-tubated and ventilated. Current practice is that patients are manually ventilated, by hand, during transfer from the operating theatre to the intensive care unit.

Read the detailed description

Following major head and neck surgery it may be necessary to keep patients intubated and ventilated for at least 12 hours to allow the swelling associated with the operation to subside. Therefore patients (participants) are transferred to the intensive care unit anaesthetised, in-tubated and ventilated. Current practice is that patients are manually ventilated, by hand, during transfer from the operating theatre to the intensive care unit.

Studies show that use of manual ventilation causes variability in respiratory parameters and blood gas values due to inconsistent ventilation. A study in 2003 found that portable ventila-tor provided more consistent ventilation and patients were less likely to have a disparity in their blood gases, oxygenation and ventilation.. However, conventional ventilators are bulky, heavy, expensive and few and far between in the hospital and, in particular, the pre-hospital setting. The Pneupac VR1 ventilator is simple to use, small, portable and durable. It is easy to clean, low cost, light weight and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatible.

The study will aim to directly compare the efficiency and efficacy (ventilation rate and tidal volumes) of manual ventilation against a new device, VR-1 portable ventilator, by Smith-Medical. The device is CE approved. The RCT will compare the efficacy and efficiency during transfer of the patient from theaters to intensive care in our establishment. The endpoint will be arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU) and transfer onto the ICU ventilator. This will be measured by collecting the pCO2, taken from an already in-situ arterial blood gas (ABG), at two time points - (a) just before patient transfer from theaters to the intensive care unit and (b) upon arrival at the intensive care unit and just prior to transfer onto the ITU ventilator.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Transfer
  • Intra-hospital
  • Ventilator
  • Manual ventilation
  • Head and neck surgery
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant is willing and able to give for participation in the study.
  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
  • Elective surgery
  • ASA 1-3
  • Undergoing Head and neck surgery, where routine care includes intubation, arterial line and post-operative transfer to intensive care unit intubated .
  • Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
  • Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply:
  • Have refused consent to participate in trial
  • Emergency surgery
  • Those patients who do not require intubation, arterial line and/ or transfer to intensive care intubated as routine practice for type of surgery/ procedure being undertaken
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Manual ventilation with Mapleson C-circuit

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Pneupac VR1 portable ventilator

    Device: Pneupac VR1

Interventions

  • DevicePneupac VR1

    A portable mechanical ventilator/resuscitator for medical personnel in the hospital, ambu-lance, fire, and police services.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pre- and post transfer partial pressure carbon dioxide measurements, from blood samples, taken from in-situ arterial line

    The difference in pCO2 between patients in the control and the intervention group.

    Time frame: Average (mean) 10 minutes

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02782871
Lead sponsor
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
Collaborators
St Thomas' Hospital, London
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2016
Start date
Jun 2016 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 25, 2022

Study contacts

Jennifer Boston
study chair · Guy's & St Thomas' Foundation NHS Trust R&D Department

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion