ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02779595Updated Nov 6, 2017

Change of Regional Ventilation During Spontaneous Breathing After Lung Surgery

An observational study in Pulmonary Infection, Respiratory Insufficiency and Aspiration Pneumonitis, sponsored by Wuerzburg University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-06.

Sponsored by Wuerzburg University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
31
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Perioperative changes in regional ventilation by pulmonary electrical impedance tomography and spirometry will be investigated in patients at risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. Those patients undergo lung and flail chest surgery.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pulmonary complications (Defined as pulmonary infection, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax, bronchospasm, aspiration pneumonitis or respiratory insufficiency subsequent to surgery) increase the morbidity and mortality of surgical patients. Several independent factors determined by the patients' characteristics and the operative procedure increase the risk for those complications. The postoperative decrease of values measured by spirometry, such as the forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), were found in patients after major surgical procedures for several days. The postoperative reduction of those measurement can be the result of general functional limitations in those patients (e.g. by postoperative pain) or the result of a regional postoperative pulmonary complication (e.g. atelectasis, pleural effusion). The method of the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) enables to visualize the regional ventilation within a transversal section of the lung in real time. Studies examining the change of pulmonary EIT for several days postoperatively in spontaneously breathing patients are lacking. The aim of the present study is to examine perioperative changes in regional ventilation in spontaneously breathing patients during their recovery after lung and flail chest surgery. Moreover, the association of those changes with expected changes in spirometry is tested. Finally, in patients with evident postoperative pulmonary complications the value of pulmonary EIT to detect those changes is investigated. The study should improve the knowledge about the development of postoperative pulmonary complications and test the scientific and clinical value of pulmonary EIT in those spontaneously breathing patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Infection
  • Respiratory Insufficiency
  • Aspiration Pneumonitis
  • Bronchospasm
  • Atelectasis
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,369 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 264 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 100 across 455 observational studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Wuerzburg University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 98 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

adult inpatients undergoing elective surgery

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult
  • Inpatient
  • Lung surgery under general anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Missing
  • Outpatient
  • Emergency procedure
  • Revision surgery of hospitalized patients
  • Pneumothorax
  • Pleural effusion
  • Pleural effusion or pleural empyema with need to cannulate
  • scheduled Pneumonectomy
  • Expected hospital stay of less than three days
  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy against material of the electrode belt (silicone rubber, stainless steel, gold-plated brass)
  • Injured, inflamed or otherwise affected skin within the target region of the electrode belt
  • Unstable spine injury
  • of more than 50 kg/m2
  • Incapacity to lie quietly for the examination
  • Pacemaker, defibrillator or other active implant
  • Reoperation before the examination at the third postoperative day

Exclusion criteria during clinical course:

  • performed pneumonectomy
  • Reoperation
  • postoperative ventilation at the third day
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Lung surgery

    26 patients (up to 36) undergoing lung surgery having an elevated risk for postoperative pulmonary complications will be examined by perioperative pulmonary function tests

    Other: Perioperative pulmonary function tests

  • Flail chest

    8 patients undergoing an operative stabilization of a flail chest will be examined by perioperative pulmonary function tests

    Other: Perioperative pulmonary function tests

Interventions

  • OtherPerioperative pulmonary function tests

    Pulmonary electrical impedance tomography, spirometry, pulse oximetry and query performed preoperatively, at the the third, fifth and seventh postoperative day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lateral Change from baseline in regional ventilation

    Regional ventilation is measured by pulmonary electrical impedance tomography. The ipsi- and contralateral change in the calculated 'Center of Ventilation' is evaluated

    Time frame: baseline and 3. postoperative day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lateral Change from baseline in regional ventilation depending on side of surgery

    Regional ventilation is measured by pulmonary electrical impedance tomography. The influence of the side of surgery on the ipsi- and contralateral change in the calculated 'Center of Ventilation' is evaluated

    Time frame: baseline and 3. postoperative day

Other outcomes

  1. Association between lateral change of regional ventilation and change of forced vital capacity

    Correlation testing is done on the ipsi- and contralateral change in the calculated 'Center of Ventilation' and the forced vital capacity in % of normal (FVC%) by spirometry

    Time frame: baseline, 3., 5. and 7. postoperative day

  2. Sagittal change from baseline in regional ventilation

    Regional ventilation is measured by pulmonary electrical impedance tomography. The sagittal change in the calculated 'Center of Ventilation' is evaluated

    Time frame: baseline, 3., 5. and 7. postoperative day

  3. Association between sagittal change of regional ventilation and change of forced vital capacity

    Correlation testing is done sagittal change in the calculated 'Center of Ventilation' and the forced vital capacity in % of normal (FVC%) by spirometry

    Time frame: baseline, 3., 5. and 7. postoperative day

  4. Time shift in regional ventilation between ipsi- and contralateral lung

    Regional ventilation is measured by pulmonary electrical impedance tomography. The shift in time of occurence of ipsi- and contralateral Ventilation is evaluated

    Time frame: baseline, 3., 5. and 7. postoperative day

  5. Impact on flail chest surgery to change from baseline in regional ventilation

    Measured by EIT

    Time frame: baseline, 3., 5. and 7. postoperative day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Würzburg
    Würzburg, 97080, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J; ARISCAT Group. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1338-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a. PubMed 21045639 ↗
  • Mazo V, Sabate S, Canet J, Gallart L, de Abreu MG, Belda J, Langeron O, Hoeft A, Pelosi P. Prospective external validation of a predictive score for postoperative pulmonary complications. Anesthesiology. 2014 Aug;121(2):219-31. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000334. PubMed 24901240 ↗
  • Karayiannakis AJ, Makri GG, Mantzioka A, Karousos D, Karatzas G. Postoperative pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1996 Oct;77(4):448-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.4.448. PubMed 8942326 ↗
  • Guizilini S, Bolzan DW, Faresin SM, Alves FA, Gomes WJ. Ministernotomy in myocardial revascularization preserves postoperative pulmonary function. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010 Oct;95(5):587-93. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2010005000137. Epub 2010 Oct 15. English, Portuguese. PubMed 20963310 ↗
  • Davoudi M, Farhanchi A, Moradi A, Bakhshaei MH, Safarpour G. The Effect of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Bypass on Postoperative Pulmonary Function. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2010 Summer;5(3):128-31. Epub 2010 Aug 31. PubMed 23074580 ↗
  • Leonhardt S, Lachmann B. Electrical impedance tomography: the holy grail of ventilation and perfusion monitoring? Intensive Care Med. 2012 Dec;38(12):1917-29. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2684-z. Epub 2012 Sep 20. PubMed 22992946 ↗
  • Radke OC, Schneider T, Heller AR, Koch T. Spontaneous breathing during general anesthesia prevents the ventral redistribution of ventilation as detected by electrical impedance tomography: a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1227-34. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318256ee08. PubMed 22531334 ↗
  • Karsten J, Heinze H, Meier T. Impact of PEEP during laparoscopic surgery on early postoperative ventilation distribution visualized by electrical impedance tomography. Minerva Anestesiol. 2014 Feb;80(2):158-66. Epub 2013 Jul 23. PubMed 23877309 ↗
  • Frerichs I, Hahn G, Golisch W, Kurpitz M, Burchardi H, Hellige G. Monitoring perioperative changes in distribution of pulmonary ventilation by functional electrical impedance tomography. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Jul;42(6):721-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05308.x. PubMed 9689281 ↗
  • Reifferscheid F, Elke G, Pulletz S, Gawelczyk B, Lautenschlager I, Steinfath M, Weiler N, Frerichs I. Regional ventilation distribution determined by electrical impedance tomography: reproducibility and effects of posture and chest plane. Respirology. 2011 Apr;16(3):523-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01929.x. PubMed 21261780 ↗
  • Guerin C, Frerichs I. Getting a better picture of the correlation between lung function and structure using electrical impedance tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov 15;190(10):1186-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201405-0812IM. No abstract available. PubMed 25398109 ↗
  • Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Muders T, Varelmann D, Gunther U, von der Groeben C, Magnusson A, Hedenstierna G, Putensen C. Electrical impedance tomography compared with thoracic computed tomography during a slow inflation maneuver in experimental models of lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):903-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181652EDD. PubMed 18431279 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2016 to primary completion in Jun 2017, 12 months.

Of 232 non-industry observational studies under Respiratory Insufficiency, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 54. This study's 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 248 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 17, 2016
First posted
May 20, 2016
StartActual
Jun 2016
Primary completionActual
Jun 2017
CompletionActual
Aug 2017
Last update
Nov 6, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02779595
Lead sponsor
Wuerzburg University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 20, 2016
Start date
Jun 2016
Primary completion
Jun 2017
Completion
Aug 2017
Last update
Nov 6, 2017

Study contacts

Markus Kredel, PD.Dr.med
principal investigator · University of Würzburg, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion