ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02772653Updated May 14, 2019

Evaluation of Resuscitation Markers in Trauma Patients

An observational study in Trauma and Hypovolemic Shock, sponsored by Andrea Campos-Serra. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-14.

Sponsored by Andrea Campos-Serra · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
66
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Severe trauma patients have an elevated risk of multiple organ failure and death. In order to increase survival possibilities the initial treatment must be focused into resuscitation from shock. Traditionally the most common resuscitation markers used are vital signs and urine output. Unfortunately, many patients might present normal vital signs, but still undergo a compensated shock with persistent acidosis, hence being able to develop multiple organ failure and death. Consequently, it is important to define better resuscitation markers for these patients.

This investigation project consists in an observational prospective study, performed by a multidisciplinary team, in which different resuscitation markers are evaluated in severe trauma patients. There will be a specific timing (1st, 8th and 24th hours from arrival) evaluation of different markers: hemodynamic (vital signs, urine output, etc); analytical (lactate, base excess, natriuretic atrial peptide); tissue perfusion markers (NIRS); microcirculation markers (videomicroscopy) and coagulopathy markers (thromboelastometry). There will be a registry of total volume administration; blood cell transfusions and vasoactive drug requirements. Each marker will be evaluated in relation to mortality; multiple organ failure; massive transfusion protocol activation; blood cell transfusion requirement; surgical control of bleeding requirement and emergent arteriographic embolization. The objective of this study is to demonstrate which of these markers is better to predict hemodynamic evolution of severe trauma patients and might become a guide for resuscitation in the future.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trauma
  • Hypovolemic Shock

Keywords

  • Microcirculation
  • Videomicroscopy
  • Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared
  • B-Type Natriuretic Peptide
  • Thromboelastometry
  • Trauma
  • Resuscitation
  • Hypovolemic shock
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

5,085 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 849 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 66 is below the median of 135 across 1,603 observational studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Andrea Campos-Serra as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Severe trauma patients admitted at Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pre-hospital Priority 0 protocol activation:
  • Glasgow coma scale \< 14
  • Systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg
  • Respiratory rate \< 10 or > 29 breaths per minute
  • Absent peripheral pulses
  • Pre-hospital Priority 1 protocol activation:
  • All penetratin injuries to head, neck, torso and extremities proximal to elbow and knee
  • Flail chest
  • Two or more proximal long-bone fractures
  • Crushed, degloved or mangled extremity
  • Amputation proximal to wrist and ankle
  • Pelvic fracture
  • Open or depressed skull fracture
  • Paralysis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalization \< 24 hours ( transport of the patient to an other trauma center)
  • Patients transported from an other hospital (first hours of medical support done elsewhere)
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Severe trauma patients

    No interventions are done. It's a prospective and descriptive observational study where different markers are analyzed: * Blood Lactate levels * Blood Base Excess levels * Blood B-type Natriuretic Peptide levels * Blood Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) alterations * Near-infrared spectroscopy alterations * Sublingual videomicroscopy alterations All these markers are analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission.

    Other: Blood Lactate · Other: Blood Base Excess · Other: Blood B-type Natriuretic Peptide · Other: Blood Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) · Other: Near-infrared spectroscopy · Other: Sublingual videomicroscopy

Interventions

  • OtherBlood Lactate

    Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

  • OtherBlood Base Excess

    Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

  • OtherBlood B-type Natriuretic Peptide

    Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

  • OtherBlood Thromboelastometry (ROTEM)

    Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

  • OtherNear-infrared spectroscopy

    Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

  • OtherSublingual videomicroscopy

    Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Death of the patient

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Multiple organ dysfunction (Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score)

    Marshall's score (MODS Score) consist on the analysis of 6 systems through different descriptors, those descriptors include: a) the respiratory system (pO2/FIO2 ratio); b) the renal system (serum creatinine concentration); c) the hepatic system (serum bilirrubine concentration); d) the hematologic system (platelet count); and e) the central nervous system (Glasgow Coma Scale); and f) the cardiovascular system (pressure adjusted heart rate). The cardiovascular system descriptor is calculated as the product of the heart rate and the ratio of central venous pressure to mean arterial pressure. All these descriptors will be measured during the first 24h from hospital admission.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years

  2. Blood cell transfusion

    Need for blood cell transfusion for patients

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years

  3. Activation of the Massive blood transfusion protocol

    Need for massive transfusion protocol activation on patients with suspicion of active bleeding

    Time frame: At hospital admission

  4. Surgical intervention for bleeding control

    Need for surgical control on patients with active bleeding

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years

  5. Arteriographic embolization for bleeding control

    Need for arteriographic embolization on patients with active bleeding

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years

Other outcomes

  1. Hospital stay

    Number of days that the patient remains in hospital

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years

  2. Intensive care unit stay

    Number of days that the patient remains in the intensive care unit

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Corporacion Sanitaria Parc Tauli
    Sabadell, Barcelona 08208, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Campos-Serra A, Mesquida J, Montmany-Vioque S, Rebasa-Cladera P, Barquero-Lopez M, Cidoncha-Secilla A, Llorach-Perucho N, Morales-Codina M, Puyana JC, Navarro-Soto S. Alterations in tissue oxygen saturation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy in trauma patients after initial resuscitation are associated with occult shock. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Feb;49(1):307-315. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02068-w. Epub 2022 Sep 2. PubMed 36053289 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2016, a primary completion of Mar 2019 and a completion of Mar 2019. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 7, 2016
First posted
May 13, 2016
Start
May 2016
Primary completionActual
Mar 26, 2019
CompletionActual
Mar 26, 2019
Last update
May 14, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02772653
Lead sponsor
Andrea Campos-Serra
Responsible party
Andrea Campos-Serra (MD, Corporacion Parc Tauli) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 13, 2016
Start date
May 2016
Primary completion
Mar 26, 2019
Completion
Mar 26, 2019
Last update
May 14, 2019

Study contacts

Andrea Campos-Serra, MD
principal investigator · Corporacion Sanitaria Parc Tauli
Salvador Navarro-Soto, MD, PhD
study director · Corporacion Sanitaria Parc Tauli
Sandra Montmany-Vioque, MD, PhD
study director · Corporacion Sanitaria Parc Tauli

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion